Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa-A gender perspective.
Africa
career stage
collaboration
funding
gender difference
mobility
scientific publication output
workload
Journal
Frontiers in research metrics and analytics
ISSN: 2504-0537
Titre abrégé: Front Res Metr Anal
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101718019
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
09
09
2022
accepted:
19
01
2023
entrez:
9
3
2023
pubmed:
10
3
2023
medline:
10
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A large body of literature on gender differences in scientific publication output has clearly established that women scientists publish less that men do. Yet, no single explanation or group of explanations satisfactorily accounts for this difference, which has been called the "productivity puzzle". To provide a more refined portrait of the scientific publication output of women in relation to that of their male peers, we conducted a web-based survey in 2016 of individual researchers across all African countries, except Libya. The resulting 6,875 valid questionnaires submitted by respondents in the STEM, Health Science and SSH fields were analyzed using multivariate regressions on the self-reported number of articles published in the preceding 3 years. Controlling for a variety of variables including career stage, workload, mobility, research field, and collaboration, we measured the direct and moderating effect of gender on scientific production of African researchers. Our results show that, while women's scientific publication output is positively affected by collaboration and age (impediments to women's scientific output decrease later in their careers), it is negatively impacted by care-work and household chores, limited mobility, and teaching hours. Women are as prolific when they devote the same hours to other academic tasks and raise the same amount of research funding as their male colleagues. Our results lead us to argue that the standard academic career model, relying on continuous publications and regular promotions, assumes a masculine life cycle that reinforces the general perception that women with discontinuous careers are less productive than their male colleagues, and systematically disadvantages women. We conclude that the solution resides beyond women's empowerment, i.e., in the broader institutions of education and the family, which have an important role to play in fostering men's equal contribution to household chores and care-work.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36890922
doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1040823
pmc: PMC9986590
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1040823Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Beaudry, Prozesky, St-Pierre and Mirnezami.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Front Res Metr Anal. 2022 Apr 11;7:814600
pubmed: 35480783
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 Dec;15(3):75-141
pubmed: 26172066
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):181566
pubmed: 31312468
PLoS Biol. 2018 Apr 19;16(4):e2004956
pubmed: 29672508
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 30;17(3):e0265413
pubmed: 35353842
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 29;15(10):e0240903
pubmed: 33119671
Nature. 2013 Dec 12;504(7479):211-3
pubmed: 24350369
Sci Adv. 2021 Feb 24;7(9):
pubmed: 33627417
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 25;12(8):e0183301
pubmed: 28841666
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 3;117(9):4609-4616
pubmed: 32071248
Fam Med. 2021 Feb;53(2):92-97
pubmed: 33566342
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145931
pubmed: 26716831