Meaning and Use in the Expression of Estimative Probability.

computational model language pragmatics probability semantics

Journal

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science
ISSN: 2470-2986
Titre abrégé: Open Mind (Camb)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101723793

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 07 07 2022
accepted: 09 10 2022
entrez: 9 3 2023
pubmed: 10 3 2023
medline: 10 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Words of estimative probability (WEPs), such as 'possible' and 'a good chance', provide an efficient means for expressing probability under uncertainty. Current semantic theories assume that WEPs denote crisp thresholds on the probability scale, but experimental data indicate that their use is characterised by gradience and focality. Here, we implement and compare computational models of the use of WEPs to explain novel production data. We find that, among models incorporating cognitive limitations and assumptions about goal-directed speech, a model that implements a threshold-based semantics explains the data equally well as a model that semantically encodes patterns of gradience and focality. We further validate the model by distinguishing between participants with more or fewer autistic traits, as measured with the Autism Spectrum Quotient test. These traits include communicative difficulties. We show that these difficulties are reflected in the rationality parameter of the model, which modulates the probability that the speaker selects the pragmatically optimal message.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36891036
doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00066
pii: opmi_a_00066
pmc: PMC9987346
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

250-263

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):696-713
pubmed: 17873259
J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 Apr;39(4):607-18
pubmed: 19052858
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Apr;16(4 Pt A):458-464
pubmed: 30584042
J Autism Dev Disord. 2000 Jun;30(3):205-23
pubmed: 11055457
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Apr;16(4):231-9
pubmed: 22425667
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jul;8(7):307-14
pubmed: 15242690
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 2;118(9):
pubmed: 33619084
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):144-57
pubmed: 21735344
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2004 Mar;10(1):25-41
pubmed: 15053700
Science. 2012 May 25;336(6084):998
pubmed: 22628647
J Appl Psychol. 1989 Jun;74(3):433-42
pubmed: 2737992
Psychol Res. 2020 Nov;84(8):2325-2338
pubmed: 31250102
J Autism Dev Disord. 2001 Feb;31(1):5-17
pubmed: 11439754
Cognition. 2019 May;186:50-71
pubmed: 30743012
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Jul;45(7):1938-50
pubmed: 25577515
Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;25(12):3178-3185
pubmed: 32355335
J Autism Dev Disord. 2010 Sep;40(9):1104-17
pubmed: 20143144
Autism. 2022 May;26(4):1007-1008
pubmed: 34825582
Mem Cognit. 1989 May;17(3):249-64
pubmed: 2725262
Psychol Med. 2016 Sep;46(12):2595-604
pubmed: 27353452
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Jul;47(7):2080-2091
pubmed: 28425021
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104285
pubmed: 32535344
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Nov;20(11):818-829
pubmed: 27692852

Auteurs

Bob van Tiel (B)

Faculty of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Uli Sauerland (U)

Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, Germany.

Michael Franke (M)

Department of Linguistics, University of Tübingen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH