Task interruptions from the perspective of work functions: The development of an observational tool applied to inpatient hospital care in France The Team'IT tool.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
27
06
2022
accepted:
21
02
2023
entrez:
9
3
2023
pubmed:
10
3
2023
medline:
14
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In France, hospital units responsible for providing inpatient care have few opportunities to address the issue of task interruptions. In Australia, the Dual Perspectives Method (DMP) has been developed to assess interruptions. The method makes it possible to link teamwork and interruptions, by considering the work functions that constitute the system. To develop a tool that can characterize interruptions from the point of view of work functions that is tailored to French hospital units providing inpatient care. The aim was to adapt the items recorded using the DPM and their response categories, and to study the acceptability of observing interruptions for participating teams. The items recorded in the DPM were translated and adapted taking into account the French definition of interruptions. This step identified 19 items that targeted the interrupted professional, and 16 that targeted the interrupting professional. The characteristics of interruptions were recorded in September 2019 among 23 volunteer teams in a region in western France. Two observers simultaneously observed the same professional. Observations lasted seven consecutive hours, and targeted all professional categories within the same team. The characteristics of 1,929 interruptions were noted. The observation period was well-received by teams. The following terminology regarding the work functions of the interrupting professional was clarified: "coordination of institutional resources", in relation to "the establishment's support processes", "patient services", and "the patient's social life". We believe that our categorization of response modes is exhaustive. We have developed an observational tool, Team'IT, which is tailored to inpatient hospital care in France. Its implementation is the first step in a system to support teams in managing interruptions, and will enable them to reflect on their working methods, and whether interruptions can be avoided. Our work is part of an approach that seeks to improve and enhance the safety of professional practices, by contributing to the longstanding, complex debate about the flow and effectiveness of patient care. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03786874 (December 26, 2018).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In France, hospital units responsible for providing inpatient care have few opportunities to address the issue of task interruptions. In Australia, the Dual Perspectives Method (DMP) has been developed to assess interruptions. The method makes it possible to link teamwork and interruptions, by considering the work functions that constitute the system.
OBJECTIVE
To develop a tool that can characterize interruptions from the point of view of work functions that is tailored to French hospital units providing inpatient care. The aim was to adapt the items recorded using the DPM and their response categories, and to study the acceptability of observing interruptions for participating teams.
METHOD
The items recorded in the DPM were translated and adapted taking into account the French definition of interruptions. This step identified 19 items that targeted the interrupted professional, and 16 that targeted the interrupting professional. The characteristics of interruptions were recorded in September 2019 among 23 volunteer teams in a region in western France. Two observers simultaneously observed the same professional. Observations lasted seven consecutive hours, and targeted all professional categories within the same team.
RESULTS
The characteristics of 1,929 interruptions were noted. The observation period was well-received by teams. The following terminology regarding the work functions of the interrupting professional was clarified: "coordination of institutional resources", in relation to "the establishment's support processes", "patient services", and "the patient's social life". We believe that our categorization of response modes is exhaustive.
CONCLUSIONS
We have developed an observational tool, Team'IT, which is tailored to inpatient hospital care in France. Its implementation is the first step in a system to support teams in managing interruptions, and will enable them to reflect on their working methods, and whether interruptions can be avoided. Our work is part of an approach that seeks to improve and enhance the safety of professional practices, by contributing to the longstanding, complex debate about the flow and effectiveness of patient care.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03786874 (December 26, 2018).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36893207
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282721
pii: PONE-D-22-18220
pmc: PMC9997927
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03786874']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0282721Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Teigné et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Nov-Dec;76(11-12):801-11
pubmed: 17059892
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Mar 1;31(2):154-158
pubmed: 30476145
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2017;25(1):1-9
pubmed: 28133598
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Jun;5(2):337-9
pubmed: 24404286
AORN J. 2012 May;95(5):576-90
pubmed: 22541769
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):330-4
pubmed: 15465935
Saf Health Work. 2014 Mar;5(1):1-6
pubmed: 24932412
Res Nurs Health. 2013 Feb;36(1):38-53
pubmed: 23070978
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2009;6(2):70-86
pubmed: 19413581
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jan;58:102-109
pubmed: 27633202
Health Serv Manage Res. 2022 Jun 30;:9514848221107485
pubmed: 35771177
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 May;23(5):414-21
pubmed: 23980188
Appl Nurs Res. 2016 Nov;32:128-133
pubmed: 27969015
J Surg Res. 2014 May 1;188(1):21-9
pubmed: 24405613
Appl Ergon. 2018 Feb;67:50-60
pubmed: 29122200
Hum Factors. 2010 Apr;52(2):147-61
pubmed: 20942247
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1433-e1440
pubmed: 30113425
J Nurs Adm. 2009 May;39(5):204-10
pubmed: 19423985
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2010 Feb;16(9):22-3
pubmed: 20222227
Fam Pract. 1996 Apr;13(2):166-9
pubmed: 8732329
Nurs Outlook. 2010 Sep-Oct;58(5):233-41
pubmed: 20934078
J Surg Res. 2020 Mar;247:190-196
pubmed: 31706542
Glob J Health Sci. 2012 Feb 29;4(2):50-9
pubmed: 22980151
Int J Med Inform. 2009 May;78(5):293-307
pubmed: 19081295
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jan;66:23-36
pubmed: 27951432