Machine learning for accurate estimation of fetal gestational age based on ultrasound images.
Journal
NPJ digital medicine
ISSN: 2398-6352
Titre abrégé: NPJ Digit Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101731738
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Mar 2023
09 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
30
08
2022
accepted:
07
02
2023
entrez:
9
3
2023
pubmed:
10
3
2023
medline:
10
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Accurate estimation of gestational age is an essential component of good obstetric care and informs clinical decision-making throughout pregnancy. As the date of the last menstrual period is often unknown or uncertain, ultrasound measurement of fetal size is currently the best method for estimating gestational age. The calculation assumes an average fetal size at each gestational age. The method is accurate in the first trimester, but less so in the second and third trimesters as growth deviates from the average and variation in fetal size increases. Consequently, fetal ultrasound late in pregnancy has a wide margin of error of at least ±2 weeks' gestation. Here, we utilise state-of-the-art machine learning methods to estimate gestational age using only image analysis of standard ultrasound planes, without any measurement information. The machine learning model is based on ultrasound images from two independent datasets: one for training and internal validation, and another for external validation. During validation, the model was blinded to the ground truth of gestational age (based on a reliable last menstrual period date and confirmatory first-trimester fetal crown rump length). We show that this approach compensates for increases in size variation and is even accurate in cases of intrauterine growth restriction. Our best machine-learning based model estimates gestational age with a mean absolute error of 3.0 (95% CI, 2.9-3.2) and 4.3 (95% CI, 4.1-4.5) days in the second and third trimesters, respectively, which outperforms current ultrasound-based clinical biometry at these gestational ages. Our method for dating the pregnancy in the second and third trimesters is, therefore, more accurate than published methods.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36894653
doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00774-2
pii: 10.1038/s41746-023-00774-2
pmc: PMC9998590
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
36Subventions
Organisme : Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation)
ID : INV-000368
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
BJOG. 2013 Sep;120 Suppl 2:33-7, v
pubmed: 23841486
Med Image Anal. 2023 Jan;83:102629
pubmed: 36308861
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S841-S854.e2
pubmed: 29273309
Epidemiology. 1995 Sep;6(5):533-7
pubmed: 8562631
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 Feb;6(2):106-115
pubmed: 34800370
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Mar;120(3):224-7
pubmed: 23228816
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;187(6):1660-6
pubmed: 12501080
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Oct;2(10):781-92
pubmed: 25009082
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Apr;43(4):786-799
pubmed: 29492605
Nat Med. 2021 Apr;27(4):647-652
pubmed: 33737749
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;48(6):719-726
pubmed: 26924421
BJOG. 2005 Feb;112(2):145-52
pubmed: 15663577
Nat Med. 2022 May;28(5):924-933
pubmed: 35585198
BJOG. 2022 Aug;129(9):1447-1458
pubmed: 35157348
Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Oct 11;2:128
pubmed: 36249461
Radiology. 1984 Aug;152(2):497-501
pubmed: 6739822
Gates Open Res. 2019 Feb 5;2:49
pubmed: 31172050
BJOG. 2013 Sep;120 Suppl 2:9-26, v
pubmed: 23678873
Lancet. 2014 Sep 6;384(9946):857-68
pubmed: 25209487
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Apr;8(4):e545-e554
pubmed: 32199122
BJOG. 2013 Sep;120 Suppl 2:27-32, v
pubmed: 23841904
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975 Sep;82(9):702-10
pubmed: 1182090
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;52(3):332-339
pubmed: 28718938
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Nov;3(6):100462
pubmed: 34403820
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;34(4):395-403
pubmed: 19790099
Lancet. 2014 Sep 6;384(9946):869-79
pubmed: 25209488