Spectrum of Complications and Complication Rates After Diagnostic Catheter Angiography in Neuroradiology.
Cerebral angiography
DSA
Neurological complications
Stroke
Technical complications
Journal
Clinical neuroradiology
ISSN: 1869-1447
Titre abrégé: Clin Neuroradiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101526693
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
27
11
2022
accepted:
29
01
2023
medline:
28
8
2023
pubmed:
10
3
2023
entrez:
9
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To retrospectively evaluate the total complication rates and type of complications after diagnostic cerebral and spinal catheter angiography. Data from 2340 patients undergoing diagnostic angiography over a period of 10 years in a neuroradiologic center were retrospectively evaluated. Local, systemic, neurological, and technical complications were analyzed. A total of 75 clinically noted complications occurred. The risk for clinical complications was increased when the angiography was performed under emergency conditions (p = 0.009). The most common complication was groin hematoma (1.32%). Neurological complications occurred in 0.68% of patients, of which 0.13% were stroke with permanent disability. Technical complications without noticeable clinical symptoms of the patients occurred in 2.35% of the angiographic procedures. Deaths caused by angiography did not occur. There is a definite risk for complications after diagnostic angiography. Although a very broad spectrum of complications was considered, complications in the individual subgroups showed a low incidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36894748
doi: 10.1007/s00062-023-01273-3
pii: 10.1007/s00062-023-01273-3
pmc: PMC10449942
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
763-768Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Neuroradiology. 2007 Sep;49(9):753-9
pubmed: 17594083
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Apr;20(4):442-7
pubmed: 19246211
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 Jul;53(7):542-8
pubmed: 2118171
Interv Neuroradiol. 1998 Mar 30;4(1):27-37
pubmed: 20673388
Acta Radiol. 2000 May;41(3):204-10
pubmed: 10866072
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 May;9(5):499-501
pubmed: 27084963
Radiology. 1992 Jan;182(1):243-6
pubmed: 1727290
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Mar;21(3):541-5
pubmed: 10730648
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Feb;142(2):247-53
pubmed: 6198889
Neuroradiology. 1990;32(4):296-9
pubmed: 2234388
Lancet. 1999 Nov 6;354(9190):1594-7
pubmed: 10560674
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1998 Sep;38(9):534-9; discussion 539-40
pubmed: 9805897
Br J Radiol. 2004 Oct;77(922):831-8
pubmed: 15482994
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Feb;31(2):230-4
pubmed: 19779004
Neuroradiology. 1977 Dec 31;14(4):175-81
pubmed: 600381
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978 Nov;131(5):861-5
pubmed: 101045
Radiology. 2003 May;227(2):522-8
pubmed: 12637677
Stroke. 1987 Nov-Dec;18(6):997-1004
pubmed: 3686597
Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):812-9
pubmed: 17517935
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994 Sep;15(8):1401-7; discussion 1408-11
pubmed: 7985557