The role of partners, parents and friends in shaping young women's reproductive choices in Peri-urban Nairobi: a qualitative study.


Journal

Reproductive health
ISSN: 1742-4755
Titre abrégé: Reprod Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101224380

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 13 12 2021
accepted: 10 02 2023
entrez: 9 3 2023
pubmed: 10 3 2023
medline: 14 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Contraceptive use among young women in Nairobi remains low despite high general knowledge of family planning (FP) methods. This paper draws on social norms theory to explore the role of key influencers (partners, parents and friends) in women's FP use and how women anticipate normative reactions or sanctions. A qualitative study with 16 women, 10 men and 14 key influencers across 7 peri-urban wards in Nairobi, Kenya. Interviews were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 by phone. A thematic analysis was conducted. Women identified parents, specifically mothers, aunts, partners, friends and healthcare workers as key influencers on FP. Their interactions with these key influencers varied based on trust, the information they needed about FP, and whether they perceived a key influencer to perpetuate or challenge existing social norms on FP. Mothers were perceived to understand the social risks of using FP and thus could advise on discreet FP use, and aunts were trusted and approachable sources to impartially describe the benefits and drawbacks of FP. Although women identified partners as key FP decision makers, they were cognisant of possible power imbalances affecting a final FP choice. FP interventions should consider the normative influence key actors have on women's FP choices. Opportunities to design and deliver network-level interventions which seek to engage with social norms surrounding FP in order to challenge misconceptions and misinformation among key influencers should be explored. Intervention design should consider dynamics of secrecy, trust and emotional closeness that mediate discussions of FP to address changing norms. Further training to change norms held by healthcare providers about why women, in particular unmarried young women, access FP should be provided to reduce barriers for FP access. Women’s decisions to use family planning (FP) are influenced by social norms, the unwritten rules of appropriate actions within social networks, and are shaped by advice and information received from key influencers—important individuals who shape what is acceptable within social networks. The aim of this study was to understand how key influencers uphold and transmit information and norms about FP, and explore who women consult as they make FP decisions and why they consult these key influencers.We interviewed 16 women, 10 partners and 14 key influencers in peri-urban Nairobi, Kenya.We found that key influencers for decisions about FP included mothers, aunts, partners, friends and healthcare providers. In making a decision about FP use, women consulted key influencers based on who they deemed trustworthy to keep their FP use secret and described less trust to speak with men about FP in their social networks. Mothers understood the social risks of using FP and so could advise on its discreet use, and aunts were approachable sources of impartial information about FP. Although women identified partners as key decision makers, they were aware that power imbalances might affect final FP choices.Our findings underscore the importance of FP interventions working with women’s social networks and to address social norms influencing women’s decisions in using FP. Interventions to change FP norms should consider dynamics of secrecy, trust and emotional closeness that affect FP discussions among women’s networks.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Contraceptive use among young women in Nairobi remains low despite high general knowledge of family planning (FP) methods. This paper draws on social norms theory to explore the role of key influencers (partners, parents and friends) in women's FP use and how women anticipate normative reactions or sanctions.
METHODS METHODS
A qualitative study with 16 women, 10 men and 14 key influencers across 7 peri-urban wards in Nairobi, Kenya. Interviews were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 by phone. A thematic analysis was conducted.
RESULTS RESULTS
Women identified parents, specifically mothers, aunts, partners, friends and healthcare workers as key influencers on FP. Their interactions with these key influencers varied based on trust, the information they needed about FP, and whether they perceived a key influencer to perpetuate or challenge existing social norms on FP. Mothers were perceived to understand the social risks of using FP and thus could advise on discreet FP use, and aunts were trusted and approachable sources to impartially describe the benefits and drawbacks of FP. Although women identified partners as key FP decision makers, they were cognisant of possible power imbalances affecting a final FP choice.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
FP interventions should consider the normative influence key actors have on women's FP choices. Opportunities to design and deliver network-level interventions which seek to engage with social norms surrounding FP in order to challenge misconceptions and misinformation among key influencers should be explored. Intervention design should consider dynamics of secrecy, trust and emotional closeness that mediate discussions of FP to address changing norms. Further training to change norms held by healthcare providers about why women, in particular unmarried young women, access FP should be provided to reduce barriers for FP access.
Women’s decisions to use family planning (FP) are influenced by social norms, the unwritten rules of appropriate actions within social networks, and are shaped by advice and information received from key influencers—important individuals who shape what is acceptable within social networks. The aim of this study was to understand how key influencers uphold and transmit information and norms about FP, and explore who women consult as they make FP decisions and why they consult these key influencers.We interviewed 16 women, 10 partners and 14 key influencers in peri-urban Nairobi, Kenya.We found that key influencers for decisions about FP included mothers, aunts, partners, friends and healthcare providers. In making a decision about FP use, women consulted key influencers based on who they deemed trustworthy to keep their FP use secret and described less trust to speak with men about FP in their social networks. Mothers understood the social risks of using FP and so could advise on its discreet use, and aunts were approachable sources of impartial information about FP. Although women identified partners as key decision makers, they were aware that power imbalances might affect final FP choices.Our findings underscore the importance of FP interventions working with women’s social networks and to address social norms influencing women’s decisions in using FP. Interventions to change FP norms should consider dynamics of secrecy, trust and emotional closeness that affect FP discussions among women’s networks.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Women’s decisions to use family planning (FP) are influenced by social norms, the unwritten rules of appropriate actions within social networks, and are shaped by advice and information received from key influencers—important individuals who shape what is acceptable within social networks. The aim of this study was to understand how key influencers uphold and transmit information and norms about FP, and explore who women consult as they make FP decisions and why they consult these key influencers.We interviewed 16 women, 10 partners and 14 key influencers in peri-urban Nairobi, Kenya.We found that key influencers for decisions about FP included mothers, aunts, partners, friends and healthcare providers. In making a decision about FP use, women consulted key influencers based on who they deemed trustworthy to keep their FP use secret and described less trust to speak with men about FP in their social networks. Mothers understood the social risks of using FP and so could advise on its discreet use, and aunts were approachable sources of impartial information about FP. Although women identified partners as key decision makers, they were aware that power imbalances might affect final FP choices.Our findings underscore the importance of FP interventions working with women’s social networks and to address social norms influencing women’s decisions in using FP. Interventions to change FP norms should consider dynamics of secrecy, trust and emotional closeness that affect FP discussions among women’s networks.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36894997
doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01581-4
pii: 10.1186/s12978-023-01581-4
pmc: PMC9997433
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

41

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

BMC Public Health. 2013 May 30;13:523
pubmed: 23721196
Am J Public Health. 2007 Jul;97(7):1233-40
pubmed: 17538071
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Oct;37(19-20):NP17492-NP17516
pubmed: 34182809
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 Feb;42(2):407-422
pubmed: 31833073
Reprod Health. 2021 May 26;18(1):108
pubmed: 34039368
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020 Oct;25(5):327-333
pubmed: 32687422
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252745
pubmed: 34086806
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):357
pubmed: 34627219
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Aug 06;21:246
pubmed: 26523185
Iran J Reprod Med. 2013 Feb;11(2):101-10
pubmed: 24639734
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 May 25;2:650538
pubmed: 34816206
Int J Reprod Med. 2015;2015:190520
pubmed: 26421316
Popul Stud (Camb). 2002 Nov;56(3):311-23
pubmed: 12553329
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Jan;15(1):62-80
pubmed: 31697614
BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 22;16(1):1183
pubmed: 27876018
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Nov;25(8):792-5
pubmed: 16368587
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Aug;6(Suppl 5):
pubmed: 34404691
Afr J Reprod Health. 2010 Dec;14(4 Spec no.):98-109
pubmed: 21812203
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Feb 10;1:599774
pubmed: 34816171
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010 Sep;42(3):160-7
pubmed: 20887285
Afr J Reprod Health. 2018 Mar;22(1):38-46
pubmed: 29777641
Reprod Health Matters. 2006 May;14(27):109-18
pubmed: 16713885
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 16;14(7):e0219617
pubmed: 31310641
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 10;15:118
pubmed: 25884675
Contraception. 2013 Jul;88(1):83-90
pubmed: 23177267
Int Nurs Rev. 2009 Sep;56(3):340-5
pubmed: 19702808
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Jan 05;20:10
pubmed: 25995807
Reprod Health Matters. 2000 May;8(15):52-62
pubmed: 11424268
Reprod Health Matters. 2010 May;18(35):154-62
pubmed: 20541094
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Nov;123 Suppl 1:e7-10
pubmed: 23992625
Reprod Health. 2009 Feb 19;6:3
pubmed: 19228420
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Feb 7;13(1):58
pubmed: 32029007
Health Promot Int. 2019 Jun 1;34(3):616-623
pubmed: 29579194
Contraception. 2008 Apr;77(4):283-8
pubmed: 18342652
Afr Health Sci. 2002 Apr;2(1):33-9
pubmed: 12789113
Reprod Health. 2014 Aug 13;11(1):65
pubmed: 25117887
J Adolesc Health. 2010 Oct;47(4):374-80
pubmed: 20864007
Open Access J Contracept. 2016 Jan 28;7:1-9
pubmed: 29386932
Stud Fam Plann. 2010 Jun;41(2):109-16
pubmed: 21466110
Stud Fam Plann. 1999 Mar;30(1):54-66
pubmed: 10216896
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Aug;99(8):1400-5
pubmed: 27049877
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Aug;139:44-52
pubmed: 26151389
SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2:100031
pubmed: 34927130

Auteurs

Anja Zinke-Allmang (A)

Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. anja.zinke@lshtm.ac.uk.

Amiya Bhatia (A)

Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Krittika Gorur (K)

Busara Center for Behavioral Economics, Nairobi, Kenya.

Rahma Hassan (R)

University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.

Amy Shipow (A)

Busara Center for Behavioral Economics, Nairobi, Kenya.

Concilia Ogolla (C)

Busara Center for Behavioral Economics, Nairobi, Kenya.

Kees Keizer (K)

University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Beniamino Cislaghi (B)

Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH