Translation, adaptation, validity and reliability of Multidimensional Emotion Questionnaire for Indonesian forensic psychiatry context.
Emotion
Forensic psychiatry cases
General psychiatrists
Reliability
Validity
Journal
Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
01
04
2022
revised:
06
02
2023
accepted:
10
02
2023
entrez:
10
3
2023
pubmed:
11
3
2023
medline:
11
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Emotion is essential in psychiatrists' clinical decision-making in conducting forensic psychiatric evaluations. However, psychiatrists may not be aware of their own emotions and thus prone to the risk of bias in their evaluations. An English version questionnaire was previously developed to assess emotional response and regulation. This study aims to assess the validity and reliability of the translated and adapted Indonesian version of The Multidimensional Emotion Questionnaire (MEQ) among Indonesian general psychiatrists in forensic psychiatry settings. This is a cross-sectional study that translated and adapted The Multidimensional Emotion Questionnaire (MEQ) designed by Klonsky et al. This study was conducted between August 2020 and February 2021, involving 32 general psychiatrists across the country who represented general psychiatrists from different educational backgrounds, clinical experiences, and workplace settings. The translation process was done by a certified independent translator and tested for validity by Item-Level Content Validity Index (I-CVI), Scale-Level Level Content Validity Index (S-CVI), and corrected item-total correlation. Cronbach's alpha values measured reliability aspects. The MEQ was valid and reliable, with an I-CVI score of 0.97-1, an S-CVI score of 0.99, and Cronbach's alpha values of 0.85-0.98 for each emotion. The majority of items had a corrected item-total correlation of higher than 0.30. A proper and available tool to measure general psychiatrists' emotions in evaluating forensic psychiatric cases is essential in enhancing evaluators' awareness of their own emotions to eventually mitigate bias. The Multidimensional Emotion Questionnaire (MEQ) was valid and reliable for Indonesian forensic psychiatry contexts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36895381
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13787
pii: S2405-8440(23)00994-5
pmc: PMC9988477
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e13787Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012 Feb;37(2):152-5
pubmed: 22561427
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:799-823
pubmed: 25251484
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2019 Dec;14(1):1682911
pubmed: 31645227
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Dec 15;17(1):255
pubmed: 29246213
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2021 Jun;49(2):246-253
pubmed: 33771910
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:126
pubmed: 28270777
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Nov;25(9-10):582-600
pubmed: 30489675
J R Soc Med. 2016 Feb;109(2):52-8
pubmed: 26682568
J Caring Sci. 2015 Jun 01;4(2):165-78
pubmed: 26161370
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 05;12:691377
pubmed: 34421677
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Aug 23;16:297
pubmed: 27553955
Integr Med Res. 2016 Jun;5(2):105-109
pubmed: 28462104
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2003;31(1):18-26
pubmed: 12817839
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014;37:263-87
pubmed: 24905597
Heliyon. 2021 Sep 21;7(9):e08045
pubmed: 34622054