Successes and challenges in implementing specifications grading in skills-based laboratory courses: Experiences at two colleges of pharmacy.

Competency-based education Grading Mastery learning Skills laboratory Specifications grading

Journal

Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning
ISSN: 1877-1300
Titre abrégé: Curr Pharm Teach Learn
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101560815

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2023
Historique:
received: 12 10 2021
revised: 02 11 2022
accepted: 24 02 2023
medline: 1 5 2023
pubmed: 11 3 2023
entrez: 10 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Specifications grading, a grading schema focused on mastery of skills, may provide an alternative to traditional grading. Specifications grading uses three components (pass/fail grading, bundles, and tokens) to allow students to demonstrate competency in specific areas as part of competency-based education. The purpose of this article is to outline specifications grading and review its implementation at two colleges of pharmacy. Two colleges of pharmacy used specifications grading within a first-year skills-based laboratory course. Instructors identified key skills for each course and the minimum performance levels for each grade (A, B, C, etc.). Each college evaluated skills that aligned with course learning objectives. Incorporating specifications grading helped better align assignments and assessments to course learning objectives. Instructors felt specifications grading introduced more rigor into the course. Instructors identified four challenges when implementing specifications grading, including: (1) lack of integration into the learning management system, (2) initial student confusion, (3) modifications needed due to unforeseen circumstances, and (4) logistical issues when implementing token exchange. Many of these challenges can be overcome with instructor tracking of passed assignments and earned/redeemed tokens, periodic reinforcement of the grading schema with students, and creating flexibility within the course, especially the first time the schema is implemented. Specifications grading was successfully implemented in two skills-based courses. Challenges encountered with implementing specifications grading will be continually addressed. Implementation of specifications grading in other forms of course deliveries (e.g., electives, didactic) may require adjustment and further evaluation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Specifications grading, a grading schema focused on mastery of skills, may provide an alternative to traditional grading. Specifications grading uses three components (pass/fail grading, bundles, and tokens) to allow students to demonstrate competency in specific areas as part of competency-based education. The purpose of this article is to outline specifications grading and review its implementation at two colleges of pharmacy.
EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING
Two colleges of pharmacy used specifications grading within a first-year skills-based laboratory course. Instructors identified key skills for each course and the minimum performance levels for each grade (A, B, C, etc.). Each college evaluated skills that aligned with course learning objectives.
FINDINGS
Incorporating specifications grading helped better align assignments and assessments to course learning objectives. Instructors felt specifications grading introduced more rigor into the course. Instructors identified four challenges when implementing specifications grading, including: (1) lack of integration into the learning management system, (2) initial student confusion, (3) modifications needed due to unforeseen circumstances, and (4) logistical issues when implementing token exchange. Many of these challenges can be overcome with instructor tracking of passed assignments and earned/redeemed tokens, periodic reinforcement of the grading schema with students, and creating flexibility within the course, especially the first time the schema is implemented.
SUMMARY
Specifications grading was successfully implemented in two skills-based courses. Challenges encountered with implementing specifications grading will be continually addressed. Implementation of specifications grading in other forms of course deliveries (e.g., electives, didactic) may require adjustment and further evaluation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36898890
pii: S1877-1297(23)00025-4
doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2023.02.025
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

186-193

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Merlyn L Joseph (ML)

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Irma Lerma Rangel College of Pharmacy, Texas A&M University, 2121 W. Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States. Electronic address: joseph@tamu.edu.

Susan W Miller (SW)

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Mercer University College of Pharmacy, 3001 Mercer University Drive, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States. Electronic address: miller_sw@mercer.edu.

Sandy Diec (S)

Department of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, 4849 Calhoun, Houston, TX 77204-5039, United States. Electronic address: sdiec@central.uh.edu.

Jill M Augustine (JM)

Departments of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mercer University College of Pharmacy, 3001 Mercer University Drive, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States. Electronic address: augustine_jm@mercer.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH