Towards Eradication of PPR: Disease Status, Economic Cost and Perception of Veterinarians in Karnataka, India.
India
Karnataka
PPR incidence
eradication
financial viability of vaccination
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Feb 2023
21 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
30
12
2022
revised:
14
02
2023
accepted:
16
02
2023
entrez:
11
3
2023
pubmed:
12
3
2023
medline:
12
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this study, we assessed the PPR disease status, its economic cost, the financial viability of vaccination, and the perspectives of field veterinarians on the PPR vaccination programme implemented in Karnataka state, India. In addition to secondary data, cross-sectional surveys undertaken during 2016-17 (survey I) and 2018-19 (survey II) from 673 sheep and goat flocks and data collected from 62 veterinarians were analysed. The economic costs and perceptions of veterinarians were analysed using deterministic models and the Likert scale, respectively, and the financial viability of vaccination programmes under the best (15%), base (20%), and worst-case (25%) PPR incidence scenarios, considering two different vaccination plans (plan I and plan II), was assessed. The disease incidence in sheep and goats was found to be 9.8% and 4.8% in survey I and survey II, respectively. In consonance with the increased vaccination coverage, the number of reported PPR outbreaks in the state declined significantly. The estimated farm-level loss of PPR varied between the surveyed years. Even under the best-incidence scenario, under vaccination plan-I and plan-II, the estimated benefit-cost ratio (18.4:1; 19.7:1), the net present value (USD 932 million; USD 936 million) and the internal rate of return (412%) implied that the vaccination programmes were financially viable and the benefits outweighed the cost. Though the majority of veterinarians perceived that the control programme was well planned and rolled out in the state, a few of them disagreed or were neutral towards the plan per se, towards the coordination between functionaries, the availability of funding, and the programme acceptance by farmers. Despite many years of vaccination, PPR still persists in the Karnataka state for various reasons and in order to eradicate the disease, a review of the existing control programme with strong facilitation from the federal government is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36899635
pii: ani13050778
doi: 10.3390/ani13050778
pmc: PMC10000058
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Indian Council of Agricultural Research
ID : A. Extn.26/5/2106-AE-I/13
Organisme : Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying (DAHD), Government of India
ID : K-11053(5314)/11/2018-LH
Références
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jan 29;7:8
pubmed: 32083098
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0149982
pubmed: 26900944
Rev Sci Tech. 2004 Dec;23(3):807-19
pubmed: 15861876
Virusdisease. 2014 Jan;25(1):39-56
pubmed: 24426309
Virusdisease. 2019 Dec;30(4):574-578
pubmed: 31890755
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2009 Mar;76(1):115-21
pubmed: 19967936
Vet Rec. 1989 Dec 9;125(24):602
pubmed: 2609485
Viruses. 2021 Mar 15;13(3):
pubmed: 33804146
Rev Sci Tech. 2017 Apr;36(1):245-263
pubmed: 28926011
Vet Microbiol. 2015 Dec 14;181(1-2):90-106
pubmed: 26443889
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019 May;66(3):1349-1359
pubmed: 30839170
Rev Sci Tech. 2016 Dec;35(3):729-739
pubmed: 28332655
Vet Ital. 2009 Jul-Sep;45(3):449-62
pubmed: 20391409
Rev Sci Tech. 2009 Dec;28(3):1031-5
pubmed: 20462160