Attachments for the Orthodontic Aligner Treatment-State of the Art-A Comprehensive Systematic Review.
CAD
aligners
attachments
clinical effectiveness
orthodontics
position
positioning
tooth movement
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 03 2023
02 03 2023
Historique:
received:
12
01
2023
revised:
25
02
2023
accepted:
01
03
2023
entrez:
11
3
2023
pubmed:
12
3
2023
medline:
15
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In recent years the burden of aligner treatment has been growing. However, the sole use of aligners is characterized by limitations; thus attachments are bonded to the teeth to improve aligner retention and tooth movement. Nevertheless, it is often still a challenge to clinically achieve the planned movement. Thus, the aim of this study is to discuss the evidence of the shape, placement and bonding of composite attachments. A query was carried out in six databases on 10 December 2022 using the search string ("orthodontics" OR "malocclusion" OR "Tooth movement techniques AND ("aligner*" OR "thermoformed splints" OR "invisible splint*" AND ("attachment*" OR "accessor*" OR "auxill*" AND "position*"). There were 209 potential articles identified. Finally, twenty-six articles were included. Four referred to attachment bonding, and twenty-two comprised the influence of composite attachment on movement efficacy. Quality assessment tools were used according to the study type. The use of attachments significantly improves the expression of orthodontic movement and aligner retention. It is possible to indicate sites on the teeth where attachments have a better effect on tooth movement and to assess which attachments facilitate movement. The research received no external funding. The PROSPERO database number is CRD42022383276.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In recent years the burden of aligner treatment has been growing. However, the sole use of aligners is characterized by limitations; thus attachments are bonded to the teeth to improve aligner retention and tooth movement. Nevertheless, it is often still a challenge to clinically achieve the planned movement. Thus, the aim of this study is to discuss the evidence of the shape, placement and bonding of composite attachments.
METHODS
A query was carried out in six databases on 10 December 2022 using the search string ("orthodontics" OR "malocclusion" OR "Tooth movement techniques AND ("aligner*" OR "thermoformed splints" OR "invisible splint*" AND ("attachment*" OR "accessor*" OR "auxill*" AND "position*").
RESULTS
There were 209 potential articles identified. Finally, twenty-six articles were included. Four referred to attachment bonding, and twenty-two comprised the influence of composite attachment on movement efficacy. Quality assessment tools were used according to the study type.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of attachments significantly improves the expression of orthodontic movement and aligner retention. It is possible to indicate sites on the teeth where attachments have a better effect on tooth movement and to assess which attachments facilitate movement. The research received no external funding. The PROSPERO database number is CRD42022383276.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36901488
pii: ijerph20054481
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054481
pmc: PMC10001497
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Aug;160(2):250-258
pubmed: 34217574
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Aug 7;2019:9687127
pubmed: 31485303
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jan 11;15(2):
pubmed: 35057250
Angle Orthod. 2008 Jul;78(4):682-7
pubmed: 18302468
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 10;15(12):
pubmed: 35744204
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Aug 20;2021:5557483
pubmed: 34457219
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 26;10(1):39
pubmed: 33499930
Angle Orthod. 2020 Mar;90(2):247-254
pubmed: 31469592
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 11;18(6):
pubmed: 33799682
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Sep;78(5):361-370
pubmed: 28357471
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Mar 16;10:840622
pubmed: 35372304
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jun 22;:
pubmed: 35752496
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2022 Apr;31(2):193-197
pubmed: 36110079
Prog Orthod. 2018 Sep 28;19(1):37
pubmed: 30264270
Materials (Basel). 2019 Dec 02;12(23):
pubmed: 31810298
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Oct 27;22(1):474
pubmed: 36348394
J Orofac Orthop. 2012 Sep;73(5):365-76
pubmed: 22890691
Angle Orthod. 2015 May;85(3):454-60
pubmed: 25181252
Dental Press J Orthod. 2020 May;25(3):46-53
pubmed: 32844975
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Nov;24(4):520-527
pubmed: 33386697
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Jun 20;10(6):
pubmed: 35735656
J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Jan 21;:
pubmed: 35061060
Prog Orthod. 2022 Nov 7;23(1):37
pubmed: 36336726
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jul 29;13(15):
pubmed: 32751305
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142
pubmed: 31643080
Prog Orthod. 2014 Nov 22;15:64
pubmed: 25416143
Clin Ter. 2021 Mar 15;172(2):113-115
pubmed: 33763672
Dent Mater J. 2022 Jul 30;41(4):534-544
pubmed: 35321972
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Sep;158(3):400-409
pubmed: 32620476
J Clin Orthod. 1993 Jan;27(1):37-45
pubmed: 8478438
Angle Orthod. 2015 Nov;85(6):934-40
pubmed: 26516708
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Mar 3;2019:1075097
pubmed: 30944717
PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001419
pubmed: 23585737
Int J Dent. 2022 Feb 12;2022:1637594
pubmed: 35190741
J Clin Orthod. 2016 Jun;50(6):341-7
pubmed: 27475935
Int Orthod. 2022 Dec;20(4):100687
pubmed: 36153240
Angle Orthod. 2019 Sep;89(5):679-687
pubmed: 30920875
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147601
pubmed: 26808317
BMC Oral Health. 2014 Jun 11;14:68
pubmed: 24923279
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 May;24(2):268-276
pubmed: 33058419