Ecological Momentary Assessment of Awake Bruxism Behaviors: A Scoping Review of Findings from Smartphone-Based Studies in Healthy Young Adults.
awake bruxism
bruxism
ecological momentary assessment
masticatory muscle activity
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Feb 2023
28 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
14
11
2022
revised:
29
12
2022
accepted:
21
02
2023
entrez:
11
3
2023
pubmed:
12
3
2023
medline:
12
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The recent introduction of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) smartphone-based strategies has allowed achieving some interesting data on the frequency of different awake bruxism (AB) behaviors reported by an individual in the natural environment. The present paper aims to review the literature on the reported frequency of AB based on data gathered via smartphone EMA technology. On September 2022, a systematic search in the Pubmed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases was performed to identify all peer-reviewed English-language studies assessing awake bruxism behaviors using a smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment. The selected articles were assessed independently by two authors according to a structured reading of the articles' format (PICO). A literature search, for which the search terms "Awake Bruxism" and "Ecological Momentary Assessment" were used, identified 15 articles. Of them, eight fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The results of seven studies using the same smartphone-based app reported a frequency of AB behaviors in the range between 28.3 and 40% over one week, while another investigation adopted a different smartphone-based EMA approach via WhatsApp using a web-based survey program and reported an AB frequency of 58.6%. Most included studies were based on convenience samples with limited age range, highlighting the need for more studies on other population samples. Despite the methodological limits, the results of the reviewed studies provide a standpoint for comparison for future studies on the epidemiology of awake bruxism behaviors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The recent introduction of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) smartphone-based strategies has allowed achieving some interesting data on the frequency of different awake bruxism (AB) behaviors reported by an individual in the natural environment.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The present paper aims to review the literature on the reported frequency of AB based on data gathered via smartphone EMA technology.
METHODS
METHODS
On September 2022, a systematic search in the Pubmed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases was performed to identify all peer-reviewed English-language studies assessing awake bruxism behaviors using a smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment. The selected articles were assessed independently by two authors according to a structured reading of the articles' format (PICO).
RESULTS
RESULTS
A literature search, for which the search terms "Awake Bruxism" and "Ecological Momentary Assessment" were used, identified 15 articles. Of them, eight fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The results of seven studies using the same smartphone-based app reported a frequency of AB behaviors in the range between 28.3 and 40% over one week, while another investigation adopted a different smartphone-based EMA approach via WhatsApp using a web-based survey program and reported an AB frequency of 58.6%. Most included studies were based on convenience samples with limited age range, highlighting the need for more studies on other population samples.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the methodological limits, the results of the reviewed studies provide a standpoint for comparison for future studies on the epidemiology of awake bruxism behaviors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36902690
pii: jcm12051904
doi: 10.3390/jcm12051904
pmc: PMC10003979
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
J Oral Rehabil. 2020 Sep;47(9):1110-1119
pubmed: 32613647
J Oral Rehabil. 2021 Dec;48(12):1307-1313
pubmed: 34536309
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Nov;45(11):837-844
pubmed: 29926505
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 14;8(8):e71325
pubmed: 23977016
J Oral Rehabil. 2021 Apr;48(4):422-429
pubmed: 33278836
Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 01;10:169
pubmed: 30881335
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;61(3):376-394
pubmed: 31997358
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 30;11(17):
pubmed: 36079013
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Jun;45(6):423-429
pubmed: 29574964
Quintessence Int. 2009 Nov-Dec;40(10):849-55
pubmed: 19898717
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Apr;24(4):1395-1400
pubmed: 31646395
J Orofac Pain. 2006 Fall;20(4):306-16
pubmed: 17190029
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 27;10(19):
pubmed: 34640465
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 15;10(8):
pubmed: 33920877
Cranio. 2020 Oct 14;:1-7
pubmed: 33050845
J Orofac Pain. 2013 Spring;27(2):99-110
pubmed: 23630682
J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Jul;39(7):489-501
pubmed: 22489928
Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 05;10:170
pubmed: 30890999
J Orofac Pain. 2009 Spring;23(2):153-66
pubmed: 19492540
J Oral Rehabil. 2020 May;47(5):549-556
pubmed: 31999846
J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Jan;40(1):2-4
pubmed: 23121262
J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Feb;120(1):155-67
pubmed: 21319928
J Affect Disord. 2020 Sep 1;274:602-609
pubmed: 32663993
J Orofac Pain. 2006 Winter;20(1):31-5
pubmed: 16483018
J Oral Rehabil. 2021 Sep;48(9):989-995
pubmed: 34041773
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Jun;109(6):e26-50
pubmed: 20451831
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 05;11(19):
pubmed: 36233747
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 15;11(12):
pubmed: 35743520
Cranio. 2005 Jul;23(3):188-93
pubmed: 16128353
Hear Res. 2018 Nov;369:24-28
pubmed: 29933937
Minerva Stomatol. 2016 Aug;65(4):252-5
pubmed: 27374364
J Orofac Pain. 2007 Summer;21(3):185-93
pubmed: 17717957
Front Psychol. 2015 May 06;6:481
pubmed: 25999869
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1-32
pubmed: 18509902
J Oral Rehabil. 2019 Nov;46(11):991-997
pubmed: 31264730
Braz Oral Res. 2021 Aug 06;35:e090
pubmed: 34378672
J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Jul;35(7):524-47
pubmed: 18557918
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27
pubmed: 24482784