Safety profile of a multimodal fail-safe model to minimize postoperative complications in oncologic colorectal resections-a cohort study.
Anastomotic leakage
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal resection
Laparoscopic surgery
Multimodal approach
Perioperative complication
Journal
Perioperative medicine (London, England)
ISSN: 2047-0525
Titre abrégé: Perioper Med (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101609072
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Mar 2023
11 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
23
03
2021
accepted:
07
02
2023
entrez:
11
3
2023
pubmed:
13
3
2023
medline:
13
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite innovations in surgical techniques, major complications following colorectal surgery still lead to a significant morbidity and mortality. There is no standard protocol for perioperative management of patients with colorectal cancer. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a multimodal fail-safe model in minimizing severe surgical complications following colorectal resections. We compared major complications in patients with colorectal cancers who underwent surgical resections with anastomosis during 2013-2014 (control group) with patients treated during 2015-2019 (fail-safe group). The fail-safe group had preoperative bowel preparation and a perioperative single dose of antibiotics, on-table bowel irrigation and early sigmoidoscopic assessment of anastomosis in rectal resections. A standard surgical technique for tension-free anastomosis was adapted in the fail-safe approach. The chi-square test measured relationships between categorical variables, t-test estimated the probability of differences, and the multivariate regression analysis determined the linear correlation among independent and dependent variables. A total of 924 patients underwent colorectal operations during the study period; however, 696 patients had surgical resections with primary anastomoses. There were 427 (61.4%) laparoscopic and 230 (33.0%) open operations, while 39 (5.6%) laparoscopic procedures were converted. Overall, the rate of major complications (Dindo-Clavien grade IIIb-V) significantly reduced from 22.6% for the control group to 9.8% for the fail-safe group (p < 0.0001). Major complications mainly occurred due to non-surgical reasons such as pneumonia, heart failure, or renal dysfunction. The rates of anastomotic leakage (AL) were 11.8% (22/186) and 3.7% (n = 19/510) for the control and fail-safe groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). We report an effective multimodal fail-safe protocol for colorectal cancer during the pre-, peri-, and postoperative period. The fail-safe model showed less postoperative complications even for low rectal anastomosis. This approach can be adapted as a structured protocol during the perioperative care of patients for colorectal surgery. This study was registered in the German Clinical Trial Register (Study ID: DRKS00023804 ).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite innovations in surgical techniques, major complications following colorectal surgery still lead to a significant morbidity and mortality. There is no standard protocol for perioperative management of patients with colorectal cancer. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a multimodal fail-safe model in minimizing severe surgical complications following colorectal resections.
METHODS
METHODS
We compared major complications in patients with colorectal cancers who underwent surgical resections with anastomosis during 2013-2014 (control group) with patients treated during 2015-2019 (fail-safe group). The fail-safe group had preoperative bowel preparation and a perioperative single dose of antibiotics, on-table bowel irrigation and early sigmoidoscopic assessment of anastomosis in rectal resections. A standard surgical technique for tension-free anastomosis was adapted in the fail-safe approach. The chi-square test measured relationships between categorical variables, t-test estimated the probability of differences, and the multivariate regression analysis determined the linear correlation among independent and dependent variables.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 924 patients underwent colorectal operations during the study period; however, 696 patients had surgical resections with primary anastomoses. There were 427 (61.4%) laparoscopic and 230 (33.0%) open operations, while 39 (5.6%) laparoscopic procedures were converted. Overall, the rate of major complications (Dindo-Clavien grade IIIb-V) significantly reduced from 22.6% for the control group to 9.8% for the fail-safe group (p < 0.0001). Major complications mainly occurred due to non-surgical reasons such as pneumonia, heart failure, or renal dysfunction. The rates of anastomotic leakage (AL) were 11.8% (22/186) and 3.7% (n = 19/510) for the control and fail-safe groups, respectively (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We report an effective multimodal fail-safe protocol for colorectal cancer during the pre-, peri-, and postoperative period. The fail-safe model showed less postoperative complications even for low rectal anastomosis. This approach can be adapted as a structured protocol during the perioperative care of patients for colorectal surgery.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
This study was registered in the German Clinical Trial Register (Study ID: DRKS00023804 ).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36906563
doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00291-6
pii: 10.1186/s13741-023-00291-6
pmc: PMC10007828
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
5Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Surgery. 2015 Apr;157(4):764-73
pubmed: 25724094
Br J Surg. 2013 Dec;100(13):1810-7
pubmed: 24227369
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Aug;401(5):573-80
pubmed: 27324152
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug 28;22(32):7226-35
pubmed: 27621570
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Feb;18(1):27-31
pubmed: 18266570
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Dec 27;7(12):378-83
pubmed: 26730283
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1471-4
pubmed: 20180029
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Jun;403(4):435-441
pubmed: 29671066
Ann Surg. 2015 Aug;262(2):331-7
pubmed: 26083870
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jun;18(6):562-9
pubmed: 26558741
Patient Saf Surg. 2010 Mar 25;4(1):5
pubmed: 20338045
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(8):e2890
pubmed: 26937928
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):543-550
pubmed: 26091985
Surg Endosc. 2012 Nov;26(11):3330-3
pubmed: 22580885
J Res Med Sci. 2017 Apr 26;22:51
pubmed: 28567070
JAMA Surg. 2015 Mar 1;150(3):223-8
pubmed: 25607250
Saudi Med J. 2004 Aug;25(8):1111-4
pubmed: 15322610
Saudi Med J. 2016 Jul;37(7):731-6
pubmed: 27381531
Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):177-86
pubmed: 19638919
Ann Coloproctol. 2017 Jun;33(3):106-111
pubmed: 28761871
Br J Surg. 2019 Aug;106(9):1147-1155
pubmed: 31233220
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Oct;80(4):610-622
pubmed: 24908191
World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):659-695
pubmed: 30426190
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017 Jun;16(2):e89-e103
pubmed: 28254356
Dis Colon Rectum. 1983 Apr;26(4):231-5
pubmed: 6839891
ISRN Surg. 2013 May 16;2013:625093
pubmed: 23762627
Clin Nutr. 1992 Dec;11(6):337-44
pubmed: 16840018
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 24;5(9):e008045
pubmed: 26408282
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):68-79
pubmed: 28009729
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Jan;22(1):15-23
pubmed: 29230591
Arch Surg. 2009 May;144(5):407-11; discussion 411-2
pubmed: 19451481
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun;23(6):1379-83
pubmed: 19037698
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
pubmed: 15273542
Front Surg. 2022 Apr 08;9:821827
pubmed: 35465417
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:156-165
pubmed: 31704426
Br J Surg. 2011 Mar;98(3):418-26
pubmed: 21254020
Lancet Oncol. 2005 Jul;6(7):477-84
pubmed: 15992696
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jan;208(1):48-52
pubmed: 19228502
Saudi Med J. 2005 Mar;26(3):434-7
pubmed: 15806214
Acta Chir Belg. 2018 Jun;118(3):181-187
pubmed: 29207920
Am Surg. 2004 Oct;70(10):928-31
pubmed: 15529854
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Sep;31(9):1611-7
pubmed: 27357511
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun 7;24(21):2247-2260
pubmed: 29881234
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Nov;30(11):1525-31
pubmed: 26319887
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010 Dec;76(3):208-17
pubmed: 20005123
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jul;15(7):885-91
pubmed: 23398636
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Aug;55:7-12
pubmed: 30583114
World J Surg. 2016 Jul;40(7):1741-7
pubmed: 26913728
Surg Today. 2017 Apr;47(4):525-528
pubmed: 27416774
Surgery. 2010 Mar;147(3):339-51
pubmed: 20004450
Br J Surg. 1999 Feb;86(2):227-30
pubmed: 10100792
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Mar;19(3):288-298
pubmed: 27474844