The Traumatic Grief Inventory-Clinician Administered: A psychometric evaluation of a new interview for ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR prolonged grief disorder severity and probable caseness.
Assessment
DSM
DSM-5-TR
ICD-11
Prolonged grief
Screening
Journal
Journal of affective disorders
ISSN: 1573-2517
Titre abrégé: J Affect Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7906073
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2023
01 06 2023
Historique:
received:
10
06
2022
revised:
06
02
2023
accepted:
06
03
2023
medline:
31
3
2023
pubmed:
13
3
2023
entrez:
12
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is a need for an interview-based measure to assess Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) included in the text revision of the fifth Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorder (DSM-5-TR) and 11th edition of the International Classification of Disease (ICD-11). We evaluated the psychometric properties of the Traumatic Grief Inventory-Clinician Administered (TGI-CA); a new interview measuring DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 PGD severity and probable caseness. In 211 Dutch and 222 German bereaved adults, the: (i) factor structure, (ii) internal consistency, (iii) test-retest reliability, (iv) measurement invariance across subgroups (e.g., differing in language), (v) prevalence of probable caseness, (vi) convergent validity, and (vii) known-groups validity were examined. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) showed acceptable fit for the unidimensional model for DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 PGD. Omega values indicated good internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was high. Multi-group CFAs demonstrated configural and metric invariance for DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 PGD criteria for all group-comparisons; for some we found support for scalar invariance. Rates of probable caseness for DSM-5-TR PGD were lower than ICD-11 PGD. Optimal agreement in probable caseness was reached when increasing the number of accessory symptoms for ICD-11 PGD from 1+ to 3+. Convergent and known-groups validity was demonstrated for both criteria-sets. The TGI-CA was developed to assess PGD severity and probable caseness. Clinical diagnostic interviews for PGD are needed. The TGI-CA seems a reliable and valid interview for DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 PGD symptomatology. More research in larger and more diverse samples is needed to further test its psychometric properties.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There is a need for an interview-based measure to assess Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) included in the text revision of the fifth Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorder (DSM-5-TR) and 11th edition of the International Classification of Disease (ICD-11). We evaluated the psychometric properties of the Traumatic Grief Inventory-Clinician Administered (TGI-CA); a new interview measuring DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 PGD severity and probable caseness.
METHODS
In 211 Dutch and 222 German bereaved adults, the: (i) factor structure, (ii) internal consistency, (iii) test-retest reliability, (iv) measurement invariance across subgroups (e.g., differing in language), (v) prevalence of probable caseness, (vi) convergent validity, and (vii) known-groups validity were examined.
RESULTS
Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) showed acceptable fit for the unidimensional model for DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 PGD. Omega values indicated good internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was high. Multi-group CFAs demonstrated configural and metric invariance for DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 PGD criteria for all group-comparisons; for some we found support for scalar invariance. Rates of probable caseness for DSM-5-TR PGD were lower than ICD-11 PGD. Optimal agreement in probable caseness was reached when increasing the number of accessory symptoms for ICD-11 PGD from 1+ to 3+. Convergent and known-groups validity was demonstrated for both criteria-sets.
LIMITATIONS
The TGI-CA was developed to assess PGD severity and probable caseness. Clinical diagnostic interviews for PGD are needed.
CONCLUSIONS
The TGI-CA seems a reliable and valid interview for DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 PGD symptomatology. More research in larger and more diverse samples is needed to further test its psychometric properties.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36907465
pii: S0165-0327(23)00336-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.006
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
188-197Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest None.