Safety and Tolerability of Bilastine 0.6% Ophthalmic Solution: An 8-Weeks Phase III Study.

H1-antihistamine allergic conjunctivitis bilastine ocular allergy ophthalmic solution safety

Journal

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
ISSN: 1177-5467
Titre abrégé: Clin Ophthalmol
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101321512

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 18 11 2022
accepted: 09 02 2023
entrez: 13 3 2023
pubmed: 14 3 2023
medline: 14 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The objective of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of preservative-free bilastine 0.6% ophthalmic solution after 8 weeks of once-daily administration in patients with allergic conjunctivitis (AC). Multi-center, international, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase III study of adult patients with seasonal or perennial AC. The study was conducted in 26 centers of 5 European countries. Duration of daily treatment with bilastine 0.6% ophthalmic solution or placebo was 8 weeks. Safety was evaluated by analyzing incidence of ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); additionally, and as secondary parameters, ocular tolerability was assessed, in addition efficacy was also assessed by the average daily total eye symptoms score (TESS). A total of 333 randomized patients with AC were included (bilastine, N=218; placebo, N=115). Mean (SD) age of the patients was 39.9 (13.7) and were 63.7% female. Overall, the percentage of ocular related TEAEs was low, and the percentage of patients with ocular related TEAEs was lower in the bilastine ophthalmic solution group (2.8%) than in the placebo group (4.3%). No severe TEAEs were reported. The ocular symptoms and TESS improved during the trial in both treatment groups. Statistically significant treatment differences were observed at Week 8 for the TESS and all individual ocular symptoms, being significantly better in the bilastine ophthalmic solution group than in placebo group. Bilastine 0.6% ophthalmic solution revealed no safety concerns in patients with AC after 8 weeks of once-daily administration. Bilastine was effective in reducing ocular symptoms associated with AC in response to both seasonal and perennial allergens.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36909350
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S398168
pii: 398168
pmc: PMC9994667
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

735-746

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Kuna et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

PA, GH and NFH are employees of FAES FARMA. In addition, GH NFH have a patent EP3740191B1 issued to FAES FARMA. MJ reports personal fees from FAES PHARMA, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Allergopharma, ALK, Stallergenes, Hal, Allergy Therapeutics, Leti, GSK, Novartis, Genentech, TEVA, TAKEDA, Chiesi, Shire, Janssen, Celltrion, Sanofi, Regeneron, outside the submitted work. PK reports personal fees from Adamed, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Berlin Chemie Menarini, Celon Pharma, FAES, Novartis, Glenmark, Polpharma, GSK, Sandoz, and Teva, outside the submitted work. GP is affiliated with Centrum Medyczne All-Med. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Références

Am J Ophthalmol. 2001 Jun;131(6):691-8
pubmed: 11384563
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Nov;38(9):617-625
pubmed: 36269652
J Dermatol. 2017 Apr;44(4):375-385
pubmed: 27862227
Adv Ther. 2021 Jul;38(7):4070-4081
pubmed: 34125400
Allergy. 1998 Sep;53(9):857-62
pubmed: 9788686
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 13;12:2617-2628
pubmed: 30587908
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):121-30
pubmed: 22077106
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2000 Jul-Aug;21(4):235-9
pubmed: 10951891
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;69(2):257-261
pubmed: 33463568
Eye (Lond). 2022 Feb;36(2):361-368
pubmed: 34262161
Allergol Int. 2017 Jan;66(1):97-105
pubmed: 27421817
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 Jan 21;16:5
pubmed: 31993069
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 01;(6):CD009566
pubmed: 26028608
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Mar;36(3):445-454
pubmed: 31612732
Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Dec;36(12):1011-1021
pubmed: 27498100
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr 10;11:669-681
pubmed: 28435218
Allergy. 2019 Sep;74(9):1611-1630
pubmed: 30887530
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2022 Mar 1;:0
pubmed: 35234641
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010 Jul;29(4):312-34
pubmed: 20302969
Clin Ther. 2003 Aug;25(8):2307-35; discussion 2306
pubmed: 14512137
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Feb;124(2):118-134
pubmed: 31759180
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep 14;9:1703-13
pubmed: 26392751
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Oct;15(5):482-8
pubmed: 26258920
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2012 Sep;35(7):491-8
pubmed: 22498504
Allergy. 2018 Apr;73(4):765-798
pubmed: 28940458
Clin Ther. 2001 Aug;23(8):1296-310
pubmed: 11558866
Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Dec;136(6):1097-105
pubmed: 14644221
Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb 19;13:403-413
pubmed: 30858690

Auteurs

Piotr Kuna (P)

Department of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.

Marek Jutel (M)

Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
All-Med Medical Research Institute, Wrocław, Poland.

Grazyna Pulka (G)

Centrum Medyczne All-Med, Krakòw, Poland.

Slawomir Tokarski (S)

Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszow, Poland.

Paula Arranz (P)

Department of Research, Development and Innovation, FAES FARMA, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.

Gonzalo Hernández (G)

Department of Research, Development and Innovation, FAES FARMA, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.

Nieves Fernández Hernando (N)

Department of Research, Development and Innovation, FAES FARMA, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.

Classifications MeSH