Implementation Evaluation of a Teledermatology Virtual Clinic at an Academic Medical Center.

barriers and facilitators implementation science teledermatology

Journal

Research square
Titre abrégé: Res Sq
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101768035

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Feb 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 14 3 2023
medline: 14 3 2023
entrez: 13 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Teledermatology (TD) is an evidence-based practice that may increase access to dermatologic care. We sought to evaluate implementation of TD at four Duke primary care practices. We implemented a hybrid TD program where trained primary care providers (PCPs) sent referrals with clinical and dermatoscopic images to dermatology. Patients were seen by dermatologists over video visit within days, and dermatologists managed the patient plan. We evaluated implementation using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework using electronic health record data. Implementation barriers and facilitators were collected through surveys (n = 24 PCPs, n = 10 dermatologists, n = 10 dermatology residents). At four PCP clinics throughout 9/1/2021-4/30/2022 there were 218 TD referrals. Video visits occurred on average 7.5 days after referral and 18/18 patients completing the post-visit survey were satisfied. Adoption varied between clinics, with one placing 22% of all dermatology referrals as TD and another placing 2%. The primary PCP barriers to TD were time burdens, lack of fit in clinic flow, and discomfort with image taking. Top-endorsed potential facilitating interventions included allowing for rash referrals without dermoscopy and assurance for clinical evaluation within 3 days. Addressing TD process fit into PCP clinic flow and reducing time burdens may increase PCP uptake of TD.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Teledermatology (TD) is an evidence-based practice that may increase access to dermatologic care. We sought to evaluate implementation of TD at four Duke primary care practices.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We implemented a hybrid TD program where trained primary care providers (PCPs) sent referrals with clinical and dermatoscopic images to dermatology. Patients were seen by dermatologists over video visit within days, and dermatologists managed the patient plan. We evaluated implementation using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework using electronic health record data. Implementation barriers and facilitators were collected through surveys (n = 24 PCPs, n = 10 dermatologists, n = 10 dermatology residents).
Results UNASSIGNED
At four PCP clinics throughout 9/1/2021-4/30/2022 there were 218 TD referrals. Video visits occurred on average 7.5 days after referral and 18/18 patients completing the post-visit survey were satisfied. Adoption varied between clinics, with one placing 22% of all dermatology referrals as TD and another placing 2%. The primary PCP barriers to TD were time burdens, lack of fit in clinic flow, and discomfort with image taking. Top-endorsed potential facilitating interventions included allowing for rash referrals without dermoscopy and assurance for clinical evaluation within 3 days.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Addressing TD process fit into PCP clinic flow and reducing time burdens may increase PCP uptake of TD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36909611
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2558425/v1
pmc: PMC10002841
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Preprint

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : F30 DC019846
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : UpdateIn

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest related to this work.

Auteurs

Meenal Kheterpal (M)

Department of Dermatology, Duke University.

Ethan D Borre (ED)

DUMC: Duke University School of Medicine.

Matilda W Nicholas (MW)

DUMC: Duke University School of Medicine.

Edward W Cooner (EW)

DUMC: Duke University School of Medicine.

Donna Phinney (D)

DUHS: Dow University of Health Sciences.

Kelly Gagnon (K)

DUHS: Dow University of Health Sciences.

Leah L Zullig (LL)

DUMC: Dongguk University Medical Center.

Heather A King (HA)

DUMC: Duke University School of Medicine.

Elizabeth J Malcolm (EJ)

DUMC: Duke University School of Medicine.

Suephy C Chen (SC)

DUMC: Duke University School of Medicine.

Classifications MeSH