The community mental health team fidelity scale: A measure of program fidelity of social networks interventions for severe mental illness.
community mental health
complex interventions
fidelity
implementation science
measure development
open dialogue
severe mental illness
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
21
10
2022
accepted:
03
02
2023
entrez:
13
3
2023
pubmed:
14
3
2023
medline:
14
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Open dialogue (OD) is a multi-component therapeutic and organizational intervention for crisis and continuing community mental health care with a therapeutic focus on clients' social networks. The development and implementation of this model of care in the United Kingdom requires considerable contextual adaptations which need to be assessed to support effective implementation. Program fidelity-the extent to which core components of an intervention are delivered as intended by an intervention protocol at all levels-is crucial for these adaptations. To develop, pilot, and implement a program fidelity measure for community mental health services providing OD and 'treatment as usual' (TAU) or standard NHS crisis and community care. Measure structure, content, and scoring were developed and refined through an iterative process of discussion between the research team and OD experts. Measure was piloted in the 6 OD and 6 TAU services participating in a large-scale research program. Initial data suggests that the Community Mental Health Team Fidelity Scale (COM-FIDE) is a potentially reliable and feasible measure of the fidelity of community mental health services and specific OD components of such services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36910782
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1076791
pmc: PMC9992884
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1076791Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Alvarez-Monjaras, Lotmore, Razzaque, Hopfenbeck and Pilling.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer TB declared a past co-authorship with the author MA-M to the handling editor.
Références
J Pers Assess. 2003 Feb;80(1):99-103
pubmed: 12584072
BMJ. 2005 Sep 17;331(7517):599
pubmed: 16103032
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 06;13:1041375
pubmed: 36687823
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;199(1):71-6
pubmed: 21292926
Implement Sci. 2007 Nov 30;2:40
pubmed: 18053122
Prev Sci. 2004 Mar;5(1):41-5
pubmed: 15058911
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Feb;31(1):79-88
pubmed: 21130938
J Interprof Care. 2014 Sep;28(5):433-9
pubmed: 24693931
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jul;66(7):674-6
pubmed: 25555176
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Jan;38(1):32-43
pubmed: 20957425
J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Aug;34(7):691-6
pubmed: 19487232
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:168-175
pubmed: 30253321
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50119
pubmed: 23185552
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Jun;30(3):811-816
pubmed: 33848029
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Feb;113:106664
pubmed: 34958932
Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012;8(1):23-34
pubmed: 22833776
Community Ment Health J. 2015 Nov;51(8):931-8
pubmed: 25686550
J Public Health Dent. 2011 Winter;71(s1):S52-S63
pubmed: 21499543
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 1;16(1):427
pubmed: 27905909
Nurs Res. 2004 Jan-Feb;53(1):63-6
pubmed: 14726779
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Feb 14;14:39
pubmed: 24528545
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Sep;93(5):959-81
pubmed: 18808219
Trials. 2013 Aug 20;14:265
pubmed: 23962220
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76
pubmed: 20957426
Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;187:68-75
pubmed: 15994574
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 08;15:74
pubmed: 25879674
Fam Process. 2003 Fall;42(3):403-18
pubmed: 14606203
JAMA. 1988 Sep 23-30;260(12):1743-8
pubmed: 3045356
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Aug;63(8):765-71
pubmed: 22854723