Diagnostic Accuracy of Portable, Handheld Point-of-Care Tests vs Laboratory-Based Bilirubin Quantification in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.


Journal

JAMA pediatrics
ISSN: 2168-6211
Titre abrégé: JAMA Pediatr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589544

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 05 2023
Historique:
pmc-release: 13 03 2024
medline: 3 5 2023
pubmed: 14 3 2023
entrez: 13 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Quantification of bilirubin in blood is essential for early diagnosis and timely treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Handheld point-of-care (POC) devices may overcome the current issues with conventional laboratory-based bilirubin (LBB) quantification. To systematically evaluate the reported diagnostic accuracy of POC devices compared with LBB quantification. A systematic literature search was conducted in 6 electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) up to December 5, 2022. Studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis if they had a prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, or cross-sectional design and reported on the comparison between POC device(s) and LBB quantification in neonates aged 0 to 28 days. Point-of-care devices needed the following characteristics: portable, handheld, and able to provide a result within 30 minutes. This study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline. Data extraction was performed by 2 independent reviewers into a prespecified, customized form. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed of multiple Bland-Altman studies using the Tipton and Shuster method for the main outcome. The main outcome was mean difference and limits of agreement in bilirubin levels between POC device and LBB quantification. Secondary outcomes were (1) turnaround time (TAT), (2) blood volumes, and (3) percentage of failed quantifications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria (9 cross-sectional studies and 1 prospective cohort study), representing 3122 neonates. Three studies were considered to have a high risk of bias. The Bilistick was evaluated as the index test in 8 studies and the BiliSpec in 2. A total of 3122 paired measurements showed a pooled mean difference in total bilirubin levels of -14 μmol/L, with pooled 95% CBs of -106 to 78 μmol/L. For the Bilistick, the pooled mean difference was -17 μmol/L (95% CBs, -114 to 80 μmol/L). Point-of-care devices were faster in returning results compared with LBB quantification, whereas blood volume needed was less. The Bilistick was more likely to have a failed quantification compared with LBB. Despite the advantages that handheld POC devices offer, these findings suggest that the imprecision for measurement of neonatal bilirubin needs improvement to tailor neonatal jaundice management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36912856
pii: 2802016
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.0059
pmc: PMC10012043
doi:

Substances chimiques

Bilirubin RFM9X3LJ49

Types de publication

Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

479-488

Auteurs

Lauren E H Westenberg (LEH)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Jasper V Been (JV)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Sten P Willemsen (SP)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Jolande Y Vis (JY)

Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Andrei N Tintu (AN)

Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Wichor M Bramer (WM)

Medical Library, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Peter H Dijk (PH)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Eric A P Steegers (EAP)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Irwin K M Reiss (IKM)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Christian V Hulzebos (CV)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH