Effects of angel wings on morphological and histological characteristics of White Roman geese.

angel wing histological morphology white Roman geese

Journal

Poultry science
ISSN: 1525-3171
Titre abrégé: Poult Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401150

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2023
Historique:
received: 05 06 2022
revised: 07 11 2022
accepted: 01 12 2022
medline: 1 5 2023
pubmed: 14 3 2023
entrez: 13 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study aims to determine the effects of normal and angel wing on morphological and histological characteristics of white Roman geese. Angel wing is a torsion of a wing at the carpometacarpus all the way down to the end, stretching outward away from the body lateral. In this study, 30 geese were raised for observing the whole appearance, including stretched wings and morphologies of defeathered wings at 14 wk old. A group of 30 goslings was raised to observe the feature of conformation development of wing bones from 4 to 8 wk old by X-ray photography. The results show that normal wing on angles of the metacarpals and radioulnar bones has a trend greater than the angel wing group (P = 0.927) at the age of 10 wk. According to 64-slice images of computerized tomography scanner on a group of 10-wk-old geese, the interstice at the carpus joint of the angel wing was larger than that of the normal wing. The slight to moderate dilated space of the carpometacarpal joint was found in the angel wing group. In conclusion, the angel wing is torqued outward away from the body laterals at the carpometacarpus and has a slight to moderate dilated space in the carpometacarpal joint. The normal wing geese exhibited an angel that is 9.24% greater than those of angel wing geese at the age of 14 wk (130 vs. 118.5°).

Identifiants

pubmed: 36913753
pii: S0032-5791(22)00683-6
doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102389
pmc: PMC10024165
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102389

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Shen Chang Chang (SC)

Kaohsiung Animal Propagation Station, Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan.

Min Jung Lin (MJ)

Changhua Animal Propagation Station, Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Changhua 52149, Taiwan.

Chao Hsien Lee (CH)

Dairy Assocation of Taiwan, Taipei 106011, Taiwan.

Li Jen Lin (LJ)

School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.

Jiunn Wang Liao (JW)

Graduate Institute of Veterinary Pathobiology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 40227, Taiwan.

Tzu Tai Lee (TT)

Department of Animal Science, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 40227, Taiwan; The iEGG and Animal Biotechnology Center, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 40227, Taiwan; Smart Sustainable New Agriculture Research Center (SMARTer), Taichung, 40227, Taiwan. Electronic address: ttlee@dragon.nchu.edu.tw.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH