Comparison of Two Culture-Based Detection Systems for the Isolation of Arcobacter butzleri, Arcobacter cryaerophilus, and Arcobacter skirrowii in Raw Ground Poultry.
Arcobacter butzleri
Arcobacter cryaerophilus
Arcobacter skirrowii
Method comparison
Raw ground poultry
Journal
Journal of food protection
ISSN: 1944-9097
Titre abrégé: J Food Prot
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7703944
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
received:
25
10
2022
revised:
03
01
2023
accepted:
24
01
2023
entrez:
14
3
2023
pubmed:
15
3
2023
medline:
16
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Arcobacters are emerging pathogens that have been underestimated due to a lack of a standardized isolation method. The aim of this research was to evaluate the ability to isolate Arcobacter butzleri, Arcobacter cryaerophilus, and Arcobacter skirrowii using two Arcobacter-specific culture detection systems: (i) the Houf broth and modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar supplemented with cefoperazone, amphotericin B, and teicoplanin (HB/mCCDA+CAT), and (ii) the Nguyen-Restaino-Juárez Arcobacter enrichment broth and chromogenic agar (NRJ-B/M). Both detection systems were evaluated for productivity ratio, sensitivity, and specificity. As a result, the productivity ratio for both plating agars were >90%, which indicates that the selective agents used in the two plating agars did not inhibit Arcobacter growth. Moreover, sensitivity evaluations using artificially inoculated retail ground poultry (n = 780) determined that both detection systems were able to isolate A. butlzeri with >95% sensitivity at the 0.1 and 1.0-2.0 CFU/g detection level. The sensitivity in A. cryaerophilus isolation was higher for NRJ-B/M (78.0% at 0.1 CFU/g; 95.1% at 1.0-2.0 CFU/g) when compared with HB/mCCDA+CAT (34.1% at 0.1 CFU/g; 51.2% at 1.0-2.0 CFU/g). Both detection systems resulted in <50% sensitivity when isolating A. skirrowii at 0.1 and 1.0-2.0 CFU/g; however, the sensitivity for NRJ-B/M was significantly higher than HB/mCCDA+CAT. At the detection level of 5.0 CFU/g, both detection systems were able to isolate A. skirrowii with 100% sensitivity. Specificity comparisons using uninoculated ground poultry samples (n = 40) indicated the growth of background microbiota were significantly inhibited or could be easily differentiated on NRJ-B/M (90.0%, specificity) when compared with HB/mCCDA+CAT (30.0%, specificity). Overall, these results show that the NRJ-B/M detection system is a more sensitive and specific detection system when isolating Arcobacter spp. from ground chicken.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36916562
pii: S0362-028X(23)06726-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100057
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Agar
9002-18-0
Cefoperazone
7U75I1278D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100057Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.