Components of Professional Practice Models.
Journal
The Journal of nursing administration
ISSN: 1539-0721
Titre abrégé: J Nurs Adm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1263116
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Apr 2023
01 Apr 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
15
3
2023
medline:
28
3
2023
entrez:
14
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study describes common components of nursing professional practice models (NPPMs) of Magnet ® -designated nursing service organizations. Components of professional practice models have not been consistently analyzed, suggesting a need to identify their concepts. Evidence-based guidelines may be unavailable to assist in the creation and revision of models. A checklist was used to analyze 56 Web-based NPPMs of Magnet-designated nursing departments. Checklist items showed a match with parent organizations, an emphasis on patient- or family-centered care, a commitment to quality nursing services, and nursing's professional distinctiveness. Responses indicated engagement in shared governance and support of nursing staff's professional development. The concepts of health, care of sick and well people, and scope of nursing services were inconsistently addressed and call for further research. Nurse leaders should examine concepts in NPPMs and the extent they distinguish nursing's professional identity both within and externally to the organization.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study describes common components of nursing professional practice models (NPPMs) of Magnet ® -designated nursing service organizations.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Components of professional practice models have not been consistently analyzed, suggesting a need to identify their concepts. Evidence-based guidelines may be unavailable to assist in the creation and revision of models.
METHODS
METHODS
A checklist was used to analyze 56 Web-based NPPMs of Magnet-designated nursing departments.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Checklist items showed a match with parent organizations, an emphasis on patient- or family-centered care, a commitment to quality nursing services, and nursing's professional distinctiveness. Responses indicated engagement in shared governance and support of nursing staff's professional development. The concepts of health, care of sick and well people, and scope of nursing services were inconsistently addressed and call for further research.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Nurse leaders should examine concepts in NPPMs and the extent they distinguish nursing's professional identity both within and externally to the organization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36916793
doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001271
pii: 00005110-202304000-00006
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
204-213Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
American Nurses Association, (2021). ANCC Magnet Recognition Program ® . https://wwwnursingworldorg/organizational-programs/magnet/ . Accessed July 31, 2022.
Cordo J, Hill-Rodriguez D. The evolution of a nursing professional practice model through leadership support of clinical nurse engagement, empowerment, and shared decision making. Nurs Lead . 2017;15(5):325–330. doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2017.07.009.
doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2017.07.009
Robbins H. A process for developing a professional practice model with branding support from communication design students. Br J Nurs . 2019;28(15):993–1000. doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2019.28.15.993.
doi: doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2019.28.15.993
Slatyer S, Coventry LL, Twigg D, Davis S. Professional practice models for nursing: a review of the literature and synthesis of key components. J Nurs Manag . 2016;24:139–150. doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12309 https://doi.org/10.1177/019394590831993 .
doi: doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12309
Fawcett J. Analysis and Evaluation of Conceptual Models of Nursing . 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company; 1989.
Kim HS. Structuring the nursing knowledge system: a typology of four domains. Sch Inq Nurs Pract . 1987;1:99–110.
Parreira P, Santos-Costa P, Neri M, Marques A, Queiros P, Salgueiro-Oliveira A. Work methods for nursing care delivery. Int J Environ Res Public Health . 2021;18:2088. doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042088.
doi: doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042088
Fawcett J. More thoughts about models of nursing practice delivery. Nurs Sci Q . 2021;34(4):328–330. doi.org/1177/08943184211031584.
doi: doi.org/1177/08943184211031584
Pearson MM. Transformational leadership principles and tactics for the nurse executive to shift nursing culture. J Nurs Adm . 2020;50(1):142–152. doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000858.
doi: doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000858
Simpson MR. Predictors of work engagement among medical-surgical registered nurses. West J Nurs Res . 2009;31(1):44–65.
Fawcett J, DeSanto-Madeya S. Contemporary Nursing Knowledge: Analysis and Evaluation of Nursing Models and Theories . 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company; 2013.
Jenkins M, Fields B. Pursuing Magnet ® designation as a system or as individual entities: what is the right decision? J Nurs Adm . 2011;41(3):172–178. doi.org/10.1097/BBA.0b01.3c31821184ff.
doi: doi.org/10.1097/BBA.0b01.3c31821184ff
Turkel M. Magnet Status: Assessing, Pursuing, and Achieving Nursing Excellence . Brentwood, TN: HCPro Inc; 2004.
Turkel M, Smith MC, Tappen R, et al. Chief nursing officer perspectives on nursing theory-guided practice. J Nurs Adm . 2021;51(11):546–553. doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001062.
doi: doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001062
Spence Laschinger HK, Leiter MP. The impact of nursing work environments on patient safety outcomes: the mediating role of burnout/engagement. J Nurs Adm . 2006;36(3):259–267.
Stallings-Welden LM, Shirey MR. Predictability of a professional practice model to affect nurse and patient outcomes. Nurs Adm Q . 2015;39(3):199–210. https://doi.10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000106 .
doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000106
Hoffart N, Woods CQ. Elements of a nursing professional practice model. J Prof Nurs . 1996;12(6):354–364. doi.org/10.1016/S8755-7223(96)80083-4.
doi: doi.org/10.1016/S8755-7223(96)80083-4
Colorafi KJ, Evans B. Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. HERD . 2016;9(4):16–25. 10.1177/1937586715614171.
doi: 10.1177/1937586715614171
Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches . 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2014.
Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health . 2000;23:334–340.
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res . 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
doi: doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Polit DF, Yang FM. Measurement and the Measurement of Change . Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2016.
Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in Nursing and Health Research . New York, NY: Springer Publishing; 2017.
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice . 11th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2017, 2017.
Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res . 1986;35:382–385.
Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health . 2006;29(5):489–497. doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147.
doi: doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
American Nurses Credentialing Center. Find a Magnet organization. https://www.nursingworld.org/organizational-programs/magnet/find-a-magnet-organization/ . Accessed July 31, 2022.
Chinn P. Patient-centered nursing. Nursology Web site. https://nursology.net/nurse-theories/patient-centered-nursing/ . Published August 21, 2018. Accessed July 31, 2022.
Falco SM. Patient-centered approaches: Faye Abdellah. In: George JB, ed. Nursing Theories: The Base for Professional Nursing Practice . 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2002:171–188.
George JB, Foster PC. Other theories from the 1950s and 1960s. In: George JB, ed. Nursing Theories: The Base for Professional Nursing Practice . 6th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2011:181–212.
Jones NA, Ross H, Lynam T, Perez P, Leitsh A. Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecol Soc . 2011;16(1):46. https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/ . Accessed August 15, 2022.
Kaleekai-Brapoh N, Toresco D. Anchoring a professional practice model: success through collaboration. Nurs Lead . 2020;18(6):552–556.