Perceived barriers and facilitators for adhering to COVID-19 preventive measures in Chile: a qualitative study in three large cities.
Adherence to treatments
COVID-19
Chile
Latin America
Prevention
Qualitative
Social Determinants of Health
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Mar 2023
14 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
18
10
2022
accepted:
24
02
2023
entrez:
15
3
2023
pubmed:
16
3
2023
medline:
17
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Globally, it has been reported that different social determinants of health -structural, sociodemographic, economic, living conditions and cultural factors- may affect opportunities to adhere to prevention measures against SARS-CoV-2. The objective of this study was to explore the perceptions around barriers and facilitators for adherence to COVID-19 prevention measures among the adult population residing in three large cities in Chile from a social determinants of health perspective. Qualitative paradigm, multiple case-study design. Online semi-structured interviews were conducted with men and women aged 18 and over from different socioeconomic groups residing in three large cities. For participant recruitment and selection, purposive contacts were made based on community and social media networks, followed by snowball sampling. Saturation was reached at 61 participants, after which a thematic analysis was carried out with the support of AtlasTi software. The Ethics Committee of the Universidad del Desarrollo in Chile approved this study. The main perceived barriers to adherence to COVID-19 preventive measures are linked to structural social determinants of health such as income, occupation, gender, access to basic supplies, and housing. Perceived facilitators are the fear of contagion and the incorporation of measures into daily habits. The social communication of preventive measures by health authorities is perceived as punitive, affecting adherence once the fear of contagion decreased in the country. It is also perceived that the recommended preventive measures are disconnected from communities' cultural practices and people´s identity, as well as affected by gender inequities and socioeconomic conditions that stakeholders in the country do not sufficiently address. Study findings suggest that adherence to preventive measures, such as social distancing, mask use, and hand washing, could be promoted through their incorporation into the daily life habits of people and communities. These measures should consider the structural social determinants that generate multiple barriers to adherence, like poverty, occupational risks, and overcrowding. Socio-cultural dimensions of health and everyday risks need further understanding among the different communities in the country, allowing for differences in viewpoints and practices based on gender, age, place, and social identity.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Globally, it has been reported that different social determinants of health -structural, sociodemographic, economic, living conditions and cultural factors- may affect opportunities to adhere to prevention measures against SARS-CoV-2. The objective of this study was to explore the perceptions around barriers and facilitators for adherence to COVID-19 prevention measures among the adult population residing in three large cities in Chile from a social determinants of health perspective.
METHODS
METHODS
Qualitative paradigm, multiple case-study design. Online semi-structured interviews were conducted with men and women aged 18 and over from different socioeconomic groups residing in three large cities. For participant recruitment and selection, purposive contacts were made based on community and social media networks, followed by snowball sampling. Saturation was reached at 61 participants, after which a thematic analysis was carried out with the support of AtlasTi software. The Ethics Committee of the Universidad del Desarrollo in Chile approved this study.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The main perceived barriers to adherence to COVID-19 preventive measures are linked to structural social determinants of health such as income, occupation, gender, access to basic supplies, and housing. Perceived facilitators are the fear of contagion and the incorporation of measures into daily habits. The social communication of preventive measures by health authorities is perceived as punitive, affecting adherence once the fear of contagion decreased in the country. It is also perceived that the recommended preventive measures are disconnected from communities' cultural practices and people´s identity, as well as affected by gender inequities and socioeconomic conditions that stakeholders in the country do not sufficiently address.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Study findings suggest that adherence to preventive measures, such as social distancing, mask use, and hand washing, could be promoted through their incorporation into the daily life habits of people and communities. These measures should consider the structural social determinants that generate multiple barriers to adherence, like poverty, occupational risks, and overcrowding. Socio-cultural dimensions of health and everyday risks need further understanding among the different communities in the country, allowing for differences in viewpoints and practices based on gender, age, place, and social identity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36918829
doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08118-x
pii: 10.1186/s12879-023-08118-x
pmc: PMC10013282
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
158Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Community Health. 2020 Dec;45(6):1158-1167
pubmed: 32915380
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 May;106:199-207
pubmed: 33771668
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 26;18(3):
pubmed: 33530538
SN Compr Clin Med. 2020;2(12):2568-2575
pubmed: 33195996
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 28;16(10):e0258781
pubmed: 34710125
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 10;17(16):
pubmed: 32785004
Can J Public Health. 2021 Feb;112(1):17-28
pubmed: 33464556
Int J Behav Med. 2021 Dec;28(6):779-787
pubmed: 33569759
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 15;16(3):e0248495
pubmed: 33720979
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 7;15(12):e0243523
pubmed: 33284865
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 21;11:559288
pubmed: 33192820
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239795
pubmed: 33027281
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 13;18(4):
pubmed: 33668540
Science. 2021 May 28;372(6545):
pubmed: 33906968
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 29;17(17):
pubmed: 32872439
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Sep;24(18):9765-9767
pubmed: 33015824
Pathogens. 2020 Sep 06;9(9):
pubmed: 32899931
Public Health. 2020 Oct;187:67-73
pubmed: 32927291
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2020 Nov 06;29(5):e2020432
pubmed: 33175010
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jan 26;14:293-302
pubmed: 33542664
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 08;17(18):
pubmed: 32911779
Zdr Varst. 2020 Dec 31;60(1):17-24
pubmed: 33488818
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 21;15(12):e0244350
pubmed: 33347488
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Apr;9(2):390-398
pubmed: 33543447
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Feb 03;15:237-249
pubmed: 33568900
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2021 Mar-Apr;62(2):201-210
pubmed: 33183846