Application of complexity theory in health and social care research: a scoping review.
International health services
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
Quality in health care
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 03 2023
15 03 2023
Historique:
entrez:
15
3
2023
pubmed:
16
3
2023
medline:
21
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Complexity theory has been chosen by many authors as a suitable lens through which to examine health and social care. Despite its potential value, many empirical investigations apply the theory in a tokenistic manner without engaging with its underlying concepts and underpinnings. The aim of this scoping review is to synthesise the literature on empirical studies that have centred on the application of complexity theory to understand health and social care provision. This scoping review considered primary research using complexity theory-informed approaches, published in English between 2012 and 2021. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, PSYCHINFO, the NHS Economic Evaluation Database, and the Health Economic Evaluations Database were searched. In addition, a manual search of the reference lists of relevant articles was conducted. Data extraction was conducted using Covidence software and a data extraction form was created to produce a descriptive summary of the results, addressing the objectives and research question. The review used the revised Arksey and O'Malley framework and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). 2021 studies were initially identified with a total of 61 articles included for extraction. Complexity theory in health and social care research is poorly defined and described and was most commonly applied as a theoretical and analytical framework. The full breadth of the health and social care continuum was not represented in the identified articles, with the majority being healthcare focused. Complexity theory is being increasingly embraced in health and care research. The heterogeneity of the literature regarding the application of complexity theory made synthesis challenging. However, this scoping review has synthesised the most recent evidence and contributes to translational systems research by providing guidance for future studies. The study of complex health and care systems necessitates methods of interpreting dynamic prcesses which requires qualitative and longitudinal studies with abductive reasoning. The authors provide guidance on conducting complexity-informed primary research that seeks to promote rigor and transparency in the area. The scoping review protocol was registered at Open Science Framework, and the review protocol was published at BMJ Open (https://bit.ly/3Ex1Inu).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Complexity theory has been chosen by many authors as a suitable lens through which to examine health and social care. Despite its potential value, many empirical investigations apply the theory in a tokenistic manner without engaging with its underlying concepts and underpinnings.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this scoping review is to synthesise the literature on empirical studies that have centred on the application of complexity theory to understand health and social care provision.
METHODS
This scoping review considered primary research using complexity theory-informed approaches, published in English between 2012 and 2021. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, PSYCHINFO, the NHS Economic Evaluation Database, and the Health Economic Evaluations Database were searched. In addition, a manual search of the reference lists of relevant articles was conducted. Data extraction was conducted using Covidence software and a data extraction form was created to produce a descriptive summary of the results, addressing the objectives and research question. The review used the revised Arksey and O'Malley framework and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
RESULTS
2021 studies were initially identified with a total of 61 articles included for extraction. Complexity theory in health and social care research is poorly defined and described and was most commonly applied as a theoretical and analytical framework. The full breadth of the health and social care continuum was not represented in the identified articles, with the majority being healthcare focused.
DISCUSSION
Complexity theory is being increasingly embraced in health and care research. The heterogeneity of the literature regarding the application of complexity theory made synthesis challenging. However, this scoping review has synthesised the most recent evidence and contributes to translational systems research by providing guidance for future studies.
CONCLUSION
The study of complex health and care systems necessitates methods of interpreting dynamic prcesses which requires qualitative and longitudinal studies with abductive reasoning. The authors provide guidance on conducting complexity-informed primary research that seeks to promote rigor and transparency in the area.
REGISTRATION
The scoping review protocol was registered at Open Science Framework, and the review protocol was published at BMJ Open (https://bit.ly/3Ex1Inu).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36921939
pii: bmjopen-2022-069180
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069180
pmc: PMC10030763
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e069180Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;93:229-37
pubmed: 22920277
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
Health Care Manage Rev. 2015 Jan-Mar;40(1):2-12
pubmed: 24589926
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;93:238-46
pubmed: 22898721
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Feb;174:104-112
pubmed: 28024239
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;24(3):600-606
pubmed: 29380477
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126
pubmed: 33038124
J Palliat Med. 2016 Jul;19(7):767-70
pubmed: 27104490
Perm J. 2016 Spring;20(2):17-24
pubmed: 26784851
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jul;75(2):377-83
pubmed: 22560799
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 28;17(1):312
pubmed: 28454548
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0235843
pubmed: 32645060
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):308-313
pubmed: 28762632
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 22;19(1):164
pubmed: 31118005
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Dec;22(5):1101-1121
pubmed: 28039588
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 7;16(7):e0254157
pubmed: 34234368
BMC Med. 2018 Jun 20;16(1):92
pubmed: 29921274
BMC Med Genomics. 2021 Feb 27;14(1):63
pubmed: 33639930
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(1):e1854153
pubmed: 33308051
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jul 22;14(1):54
pubmed: 27448393
Implement Sci. 2016 Sep 20;11(1):127
pubmed: 27647152
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 29;20(1):365
pubmed: 32349738
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 11;20(7):e218
pubmed: 29997107
Fam Syst Health. 2014 Sep;32(3):259-270
pubmed: 24911769
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143
pubmed: 30453902
Int J Integr Care. 2017 Jun 19;17(2):3
pubmed: 28970744
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 8;10(4):e033516
pubmed: 32273313
Int J Integr Care. 2012 Sep 18;12:e190
pubmed: 23593051
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):301-307
pubmed: 28714561
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jul;104(3):240-3
pubmed: 27366130
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Aug;26(15-16):2229-2243
pubmed: 27878879
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:1811-7
pubmed: 22316977
J Health Organ Manag. 2019 Dec 19;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):
pubmed: 31850690
Fam Pract. 2013 Apr;30(2):204-11
pubmed: 22990026
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 15;17(1):78
pubmed: 29903017
Qual Health Res. 2017 Oct;27(12):1856-1869
pubmed: 28936931
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 15;19(1):162
pubmed: 32933539
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):157
pubmed: 30866912
Clin Interv Aging. 2012;7:509-16
pubmed: 23204843
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Nov 1;177(11):1634-1641
pubmed: 28973516
J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Jul - Aug;53:41-51
pubmed: 32438191
Nurs Adm Q. 2014 Jan-Mar;38(1):69-77
pubmed: 24317033
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2013 May;14(2):69-78
pubmed: 24177438
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 23;22(4):e15521
pubmed: 32324143
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Oct 19;16(1):99
pubmed: 30340495
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 20;18(1):570
pubmed: 30029638
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 1;16(1):538
pubmed: 27716177
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 15;9(8):e029954
pubmed: 31420394
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e027308
pubmed: 30904877
Eval Program Plann. 2014 Aug;45:71-81
pubmed: 24755377
Health Promot Int. 2020 Aug 1;35(4):671-681
pubmed: 31257421
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2019 Dec;14(1):1633174
pubmed: 31242817
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Mar 12;16:87
pubmed: 26968157
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2016 Jul 4;29(3):251-63
pubmed: 27397748
Obes Sci Pract. 2021 May 03;7(5):591-605
pubmed: 34631137
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 28;11(7):e047633
pubmed: 34321301
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2014 Mar 31;27(1):3-7
pubmed: 25249840
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;93:220-8
pubmed: 23103350
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Feb;198:95-102
pubmed: 29310110
J Nurs Manag. 2019 Mar;27(2):311-319
pubmed: 30203460