The interplay between malaria vectors and human activity accounts for high residual malaria transmission in a Burkina Faso village with universal ITN coverage.
Anopheles arabiensis
Anopheles coluzzii
Biting rhythms
Entomological inoculation rate
Human exposure
Residual malaria transmission
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Mar 2023
15 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
21
12
2022
accepted:
22
02
2023
entrez:
16
3
2023
pubmed:
17
3
2023
medline:
21
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mosquito and human behaviour interaction is a key determinant of the maximum level of protection against malaria that can be provided by insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). Nevertheless, scant literature focuses on this interaction, overlooking a fundamental factor for efficient malaria control. This study aims to estimate malaria transmission risk in a Burkina Faso village by integrating vector biting rhythms with some key information about human habits. Indoor/outdoor human landing catches were conducted for 16 h (16:00-08:00) during 8 nights (September 2020) in Goden village. A survey about net usage and sleeping patterns was submitted to half the households (October-December 2020). A subsample of collected specimens of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato was molecularly processed for species identification, Plasmodium detection from heads-thoraxes and L1014F pyrethroid-resistance allele genotyping. Hourly mosquito abundance was statistically assessed by GLM/GAM, and the entomological inoculation rate (EIR) was corrected for the actual ITN usage retrieved from the questionnaire. Malaria transmission was mainly driven by Anopheles coluzzii (68.7%) followed by A. arabiensis (26.2%). The overall sporozoite rate was 2% with L1014F estimated frequency of 0.68 (N = 1070 out of 15,201 A. gambiae s.l. collected). No major shift in mosquito biting rhythms in response to ITN or differences between indoor and outdoor catches were detected. Impressive high biting pressure (mean 30.3 mosquitoes/person/hour) was exerted from 20:00 to 06:00 with a peak at 4:00. Human survey revealed that nearly all inhabitants were awake before 20:00 and after 7:00 and at least 8.7% had no access to bednets. Adjusting for anthropological data, the EIR dropped from 6.7 to 1.2 infective bites/person/16 h. In a scenario of full net coverage and accounting only for the human sleeping patterns, the daily malaria transmission risk not targetable by ITNs was 0.69 infective bites. The high mosquito densities and interplay between human/vector activities means that an estimated 10% of residual malaria transmission cannot be prevented by ITNs in the village. Locally tailored studies, like the current one, are essential to explore the heterogeneity of human exposure to infective bites and, consequently, to instruct the adoption of new vector control tools strengthening individual and community protection.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Mosquito and human behaviour interaction is a key determinant of the maximum level of protection against malaria that can be provided by insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). Nevertheless, scant literature focuses on this interaction, overlooking a fundamental factor for efficient malaria control. This study aims to estimate malaria transmission risk in a Burkina Faso village by integrating vector biting rhythms with some key information about human habits.
METHODS
METHODS
Indoor/outdoor human landing catches were conducted for 16 h (16:00-08:00) during 8 nights (September 2020) in Goden village. A survey about net usage and sleeping patterns was submitted to half the households (October-December 2020). A subsample of collected specimens of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato was molecularly processed for species identification, Plasmodium detection from heads-thoraxes and L1014F pyrethroid-resistance allele genotyping. Hourly mosquito abundance was statistically assessed by GLM/GAM, and the entomological inoculation rate (EIR) was corrected for the actual ITN usage retrieved from the questionnaire.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Malaria transmission was mainly driven by Anopheles coluzzii (68.7%) followed by A. arabiensis (26.2%). The overall sporozoite rate was 2% with L1014F estimated frequency of 0.68 (N = 1070 out of 15,201 A. gambiae s.l. collected). No major shift in mosquito biting rhythms in response to ITN or differences between indoor and outdoor catches were detected. Impressive high biting pressure (mean 30.3 mosquitoes/person/hour) was exerted from 20:00 to 06:00 with a peak at 4:00. Human survey revealed that nearly all inhabitants were awake before 20:00 and after 7:00 and at least 8.7% had no access to bednets. Adjusting for anthropological data, the EIR dropped from 6.7 to 1.2 infective bites/person/16 h. In a scenario of full net coverage and accounting only for the human sleeping patterns, the daily malaria transmission risk not targetable by ITNs was 0.69 infective bites.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The high mosquito densities and interplay between human/vector activities means that an estimated 10% of residual malaria transmission cannot be prevented by ITNs in the village. Locally tailored studies, like the current one, are essential to explore the heterogeneity of human exposure to infective bites and, consequently, to instruct the adoption of new vector control tools strengthening individual and community protection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36922855
doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05710-7
pii: 10.1186/s13071-023-05710-7
pmc: PMC10015820
doi:
Substances chimiques
Insecticides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Med Vet Entomol. 2008 Jun;22(2):93-108
pubmed: 18498608
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 23;116(30):15086-15095
pubmed: 31285346
Malar J. 2007 Aug 13;6:111
pubmed: 17697325
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):235-47
pubmed: 23396849
PLoS Genet. 2016 Sep 15;12(9):e1006303
pubmed: 27631375
Acta Trop. 2018 Jun;182:149-157
pubmed: 29476726
Insects. 2021 Mar 24;12(4):
pubmed: 33804964
Parasit Vectors. 2010 Aug 04;3:67
pubmed: 20684757
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2020 Jun;39:42-49
pubmed: 32109860
Malar J. 2010 Jun 28;9:187
pubmed: 20579399
Med Vet Entomol. 2018 Sep;32(3):263-270
pubmed: 29479733
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Mar;82(3):415-9
pubmed: 20207866
Med Vet Entomol. 2000 Jun;14(2):171-80
pubmed: 10872861
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Jan;5(1):40-47
pubmed: 31792426
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 11;12(1):3589
pubmed: 34117240
Malar J. 2011 Dec 13;10:356
pubmed: 22165904
BMC Genomics. 2017 Sep 22;18(1):751
pubmed: 28938869
Malar J. 2017 Feb 28;16(1):91
pubmed: 28241888
Malar J. 2012 Jun 08;11:188
pubmed: 22681999
Malar J. 2014 Aug 23;13:330
pubmed: 25149656
Parasit Vectors. 2021 Sep 15;14(1):473
pubmed: 34526109
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7747):239-243
pubmed: 30814727
Nat Commun. 2018 Dec 11;9(1):5282
pubmed: 30538253
J Med Entomol. 1997 Jul;34(4):396-403
pubmed: 9220672
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009 Dec;81(6):1023-9
pubmed: 19996432
Evolution. 2013 Apr;67(4):1218-30
pubmed: 23550770
Parasit Vectors. 2010 Dec 03;3:117
pubmed: 21129198
Mol Ecol. 2021 Nov;30(21):5303-5317
pubmed: 33590926
J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 27;223(12 Suppl 2):S61-S80
pubmed: 33906221
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 2;12(11):e0187059
pubmed: 29095834
Med Vet Entomol. 2018 Sep;32(3):372-377
pubmed: 29344968
Malar J. 2013 Jan 08;12:13
pubmed: 23297732
Malar J. 2018 Oct 11;17(1):355
pubmed: 30305127
Malar J. 2021 Jan 18;20(1):44
pubmed: 33461560
Malar J. 2012 Dec 28;11:435
pubmed: 23273022
PLoS Genet. 2021 Jul 6;17(7):e1009556
pubmed: 34228718
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 24;8(1):12806
pubmed: 30143698
Parasit Vectors. 2016 Sep 30;9(1):527
pubmed: 27716416
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009 Nov;103(11):1139-45
pubmed: 18829056
Malar J. 2015 Jan 21;14:17
pubmed: 25604150
J Infect Dis. 2012 Nov 15;206(10):1622-9
pubmed: 22966127
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 28;21(1):882
pubmed: 34454443
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44607
pubmed: 22970263
Malar J. 2019 Jan 11;18(1):6
pubmed: 30634963
Med Vet Entomol. 1997 Jan;11(1):71-8
pubmed: 9061680
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Apr 26;2(2):e000198
pubmed: 28589015
J Med Entomol. 2020 May 4;57(3):908-914
pubmed: 31785095
Nature. 2020 Jan;577(7790):376-380
pubmed: 31875852
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 14;10(7):e0132778
pubmed: 26171962
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1997 Nov-Dec;91(6):647-52
pubmed: 9509170
Acta Trop. 2021 Apr;216:105837
pubmed: 33485868
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 3;10(1):14527
pubmed: 32883976
Med Vet Entomol. 1996 Jul;10(3):251-9
pubmed: 8887336
Anthropol Med. 2021 Dec;28(4):508-525
pubmed: 33970705
Annu Rev Entomol. 2005;50:53-70
pubmed: 15355233
PLoS Med. 2007 Jul;4(7):e229
pubmed: 17608562
Malar J. 2019 Apr 2;18(1):113
pubmed: 30940141
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Oct;19(10):902-7
pubmed: 23910459
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2019 Aug;34:48-54
pubmed: 31247417
Malar J. 2014 Sep 19;13:374
pubmed: 25238721
J Med Entomol. 2006 Mar;43(2):428-32
pubmed: 16619629
Malar J. 2014 Mar 28;13:125
pubmed: 24678587
Acta Trop. 2015 Oct;150:136-42
pubmed: 26209103
J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 27;223(12 Suppl 2):S143-S154
pubmed: 33906218
Nature. 2015 Oct 8;526(7572):207-211
pubmed: 26375008
Malar J. 2011 Jul 07;10:184
pubmed: 21736750
Pest Manag Sci. 2022 Mar;78(3):1155-1163
pubmed: 34821465
Trop Med Int Health. 2003 Jul;8(7):643-9
pubmed: 12828548
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Jun 1;13(1):277
pubmed: 32487147
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Sep;101(9):867-80
pubmed: 17631372
Malar J. 2015 Apr 09;14:148
pubmed: 25879539
BMC Res Notes. 2021 May 22;14(1):200
pubmed: 34022919
Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2013 Apr;43(4):407-16
pubmed: 23123179
Trends Parasitol. 2011 Feb;27(2):91-8
pubmed: 20843745
Malar J. 2010 Feb 26;9:62
pubmed: 20187956
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Apr;68(4 Suppl):121-7
pubmed: 12749495
Malar J. 2012 Jun 10;11:193
pubmed: 22682161
Med Vet Entomol. 2012 Mar;26(1):103-5
pubmed: 21410494
Malar J. 2008 Sep 15;7:177
pubmed: 18793416
Malar J. 2011 Apr 09;10:80
pubmed: 21477321
J Med Entomol. 2001 Nov;38(6):822-8
pubmed: 11761380
Malar J. 2015 Aug 14;14:314
pubmed: 26268225
Parasit Vectors. 2014 Aug 20;7:380
pubmed: 25141761
Malar J. 2015 Jun 25;14:259
pubmed: 26109384
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e31481
pubmed: 22438864
Med Vet Entomol. 1998 Jan;12(1):52-9
pubmed: 9513939
Med Vet Entomol. 2006 Dec;20(4):425-37
pubmed: 17199754
Malar J. 2016 Feb 09;15:76
pubmed: 26857915
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 30;21(1):251
pubmed: 33516197
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Jul;61(1):109-13
pubmed: 10432066
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 May 24;119(21):e2104282119
pubmed: 35576470
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 16;113(33):9268-73
pubmed: 27439866
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e50036
pubmed: 23320064
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Jun 10;13(1):295
pubmed: 32522290
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Jun;68(6):734-42
pubmed: 12887036
Malar J. 2008 Aug 25;7:163
pubmed: 18724871
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 May;6(5):
pubmed: 33947708
Trop Med Int Health. 2005 Dec;10(12):1274-85
pubmed: 16359409