Zilucoplan in immune-mediated necrotising myopathy: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial.
Journal
The Lancet. Rheumatology
ISSN: 2665-9913
Titre abrégé: Lancet Rheumatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101765308
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
01
02
2024
entrez:
16
3
2023
pubmed:
17
3
2023
medline:
17
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is an autoimmune myopathy characterised by proximal muscle weakness, high creatine kinase (CK) values, and autoantibodies recognizing 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) or the signal recognition particle (SRP). There are currently no approved therapies for IMNM and many patients experience active disease despite off-label treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin, glucocorticoids, and immunosuppressants. Detection of complement-activating anti-HMGCR and anti-SRP autoantibodies and the presence of complement deposition on the sarcolemma of non-necrotic myofibers led to the hypothesis that complement activation may be pathogenic in IMNM, therefore zilucoplan, a complement component 5 (C5) inhibitor, could be a potential therapy. IMNM01, a phase 2, multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT04025632) at 15 sites (four countries) evaluated efficacy, safety, and tolerability of zilucoplan in adult participants with anti-HMGCR or anti-SRP autoantibody-positive IMNM. Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive daily subcutaneous zilucoplan (0·3mg/kg) or placebo for eight weeks; with optional enrolment in the study open-label extension. Primary efficacy endpoint was percent change from baseline to Week 8 in CK levels. Secondary endpoints included safety. Between 07 November 2019 and 07 January 2021, 27 participants (13 female and 14 male) received zilucoplan (n=12) or placebo (n=15) and completed the 8-week main study. At Week 8 there were no clinically relevant or statistically significant differences, despite target engagement based on mode of action, between treatment arms in mean percent change (standard deviation) of CK levels versus baseline (-9·86% [26·06] versus -20·72% [31·22] in zilucoplan [n=10] and placebo arms [n=14], p=0·46, respectively) and no clinically relevant improvement over time within the treatment arm. There were no unexpected adverse safety or tolerability findings. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were reported in n=9 (75·0%) vs n=13 (86·7%) and n=0 (0%) and n=3 (20·0%) participants, respectively. The most frequent TEAEs were headache (n=4 in both groups [33·3% and 26·7%, respectively]) and nausea (n=3 in both groups [25·0% and 20·0%, respectively]). C5 inhibition does not appear to be an effective treatment modality for IMNM. Rather than driving myofiber necrosis, complement activation may be secondary to muscle injury. Study funded by Ra Pharmaceuticals (now part of UCB Pharma).
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is an autoimmune myopathy characterised by proximal muscle weakness, high creatine kinase (CK) values, and autoantibodies recognizing 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) or the signal recognition particle (SRP). There are currently no approved therapies for IMNM and many patients experience active disease despite off-label treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin, glucocorticoids, and immunosuppressants. Detection of complement-activating anti-HMGCR and anti-SRP autoantibodies and the presence of complement deposition on the sarcolemma of non-necrotic myofibers led to the hypothesis that complement activation may be pathogenic in IMNM, therefore zilucoplan, a complement component 5 (C5) inhibitor, could be a potential therapy.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
IMNM01, a phase 2, multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT04025632) at 15 sites (four countries) evaluated efficacy, safety, and tolerability of zilucoplan in adult participants with anti-HMGCR or anti-SRP autoantibody-positive IMNM. Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive daily subcutaneous zilucoplan (0·3mg/kg) or placebo for eight weeks; with optional enrolment in the study open-label extension. Primary efficacy endpoint was percent change from baseline to Week 8 in CK levels. Secondary endpoints included safety.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
Between 07 November 2019 and 07 January 2021, 27 participants (13 female and 14 male) received zilucoplan (n=12) or placebo (n=15) and completed the 8-week main study. At Week 8 there were no clinically relevant or statistically significant differences, despite target engagement based on mode of action, between treatment arms in mean percent change (standard deviation) of CK levels versus baseline (-9·86% [26·06] versus -20·72% [31·22] in zilucoplan [n=10] and placebo arms [n=14], p=0·46, respectively) and no clinically relevant improvement over time within the treatment arm. There were no unexpected adverse safety or tolerability findings. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were reported in n=9 (75·0%) vs n=13 (86·7%) and n=0 (0%) and n=3 (20·0%) participants, respectively. The most frequent TEAEs were headache (n=4 in both groups [33·3% and 26·7%, respectively]) and nausea (n=3 in both groups [25·0% and 20·0%, respectively]).
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
C5 inhibition does not appear to be an effective treatment modality for IMNM. Rather than driving myofiber necrosis, complement activation may be secondary to muscle injury.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
Study funded by Ra Pharmaceuticals (now part of UCB Pharma).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36923454
doi: 10.1016/s2665-9913(23)00003-6
pmc: PMC10009502
mid: NIHMS1872407
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e67-e76Subventions
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : ZIA AR041203
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests ALM is a patent author for the anti-HMGCR test. AAA has participated in medical advisory boards/acted as a consultant for Argenx, Ra Pharmaceuticals, Alexion, EMD Serono, OnoPharma, Horizon Therapeutics, Takeda, Johnson & Johnson (COVID-19 vaccination program) MD has served or recently served as a consultant for Amazentis, ArgenX, Catalyst, Cello, Covance/Labcorp, CSL-Behring, EcoR1, Janssen, Kezar, Medlink, Momenta, NuFactor, Octapharma, RaPharma/UCB, Roivant Sciences Inc, RMS Medical, Sanofi Genzyme, Shire Takeda, Scholar Rock, Spark Therapeutics, Abata/Third Rock, UCB Biopharma, and UpToDate. Dr. Dimachkie received research grants or contracts or educational grants from Alexion, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Amicus, Biomarin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Catalyst, Corbus, CSL-Behring, FDA/OOPD, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Grifols, Kezar, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MDA, NIH, Novartis, Octapharma, Orphazyme, Ra Pharma/UCB, Sanofi Genzyme, Sarepta Therapeutics, Shire Takeda, Spark Therapeutics, UCB Biopharma / RaPharma, Viromed/Healixmith & TMA. HC has received personal compensation for activities with Novartis, UCB, Lilly, Biogen, Orphazyme, Astra Zeneca as a speaker, advisory board member or consultancy, grants via The University of Manchester from Novartis, UCB and MedImmune, and has received travel support from Abbvie and Janssen. JBL has received speakers fees, travel support, and/or consultancy fees from Sanofi Genzyme, Roche, and Biogen. Yves Allenbach: has received personal compensation for activities with Lilly, and CSL-Berhing as a speaker or consultancy. Mark Vanderkelen: Employee and stockholder of UCB Pharma Eumorphia Delicha: Contractor of UCB Pharma Ramin Farzaneh-Far: was an employee of Ra Pharma at the time of the study BB, HK, PWD, CS* and OB are employees and stockholders of UCB Pharma IPF and YH have no competing interests to declare *Employee at the time to the study
Références
Autoimmun Rev. 2019 Mar;18(3):223-230
pubmed: 30639649
Front Immunol. 2019 Aug 08;10:1936
pubmed: 31440263
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jan;78(1):131-139
pubmed: 30309969
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2018 Mar 26;20(4):21
pubmed: 29582188
Br J Haematol. 2019 Apr;185(2):297-310
pubmed: 30768680
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Jul;63(7):1961-71
pubmed: 21400483
Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 May;93(3):150-157
pubmed: 24797170
Neuromuscul Disord. 2018 Jan;28(1):87-99
pubmed: 29221629
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Aug 30;61(9):3824-3829
pubmed: 35022671
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 May;69(5):898-910
pubmed: 28382787
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2021 May;30(5):483-493
pubmed: 33792453
Neurology. 2018 Feb 6;90(6):e507-e517
pubmed: 29330311
Biomedicines. 2022 Aug 20;10(8):
pubmed: 36009583
J Vis Exp. 2010 Mar 29;(37):
pubmed: 20351687
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2018 Nov;30(6):655-663
pubmed: 30239349
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Dec;64(12):4087-93
pubmed: 22933019
JAMA Neurol. 2020 May 1;77(5):582-592
pubmed: 32065623
Ann Neurol. 2017 Apr;81(4):538-548
pubmed: 28224701
Eur J Neurol. 2020 May;27 Suppl 1:1-1228
pubmed: 32441453
J Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Mar 1;28(2):e517-e520
pubmed: 34581697