Understanding Statistical Noise in Research: 2. Noise in Clinical Trials and Observational Studies.
Signal
confounding
noise
observational studies
postrandomization bias
randomized controlled trials
regression
Journal
Indian journal of psychological medicine
ISSN: 0253-7176
Titre abrégé: Indian J Psychol Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7910727
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
entrez:
17
3
2023
pubmed:
18
3
2023
medline:
18
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The previous article in this series explained basic concepts related to statistical signals and statistical noise in research. This article explains statistical noise in the context of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies and offers suggestions on how noise in such studies may be reduced so as to better detect and understand the signal. Postrandomization bias related to RCTs and confounding in observational studies are discussed. Examples are provided to facilitate understanding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36925488
doi: 10.1177/02537176221149162
pii: 10.1177_02537176221149162
pmc: PMC10011845
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
198-200Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Indian J Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;45(1):89-90
pubmed: 36778609
Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Oct;2(4):145-8
pubmed: 22145125
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0211404
pubmed: 30785890
JAMA. 2016 Jun 7;315(21):2273-4
pubmed: 27272576
J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;78(2):e162-e165
pubmed: 28234438
Biometrics. 2009 Sep;65(3):937-45
pubmed: 19210739
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 May;74(5):479-81
pubmed: 23759451
Psychosom Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;67(4):652-5
pubmed: 16046383