Compliance with Section 7 (2) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) 2003, Ban of Sale of Loose Tobacco, in Karnataka: A Cross-Sectional Study.

COTPA Single cigarette compliance loose cigarette tobacco control

Journal

Indian journal of psychological medicine
ISSN: 0253-7176
Titre abrégé: Indian J Psychol Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7910727

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Historique:
entrez: 17 3 2023
pubmed: 18 3 2023
medline: 18 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Banning smoking in public places has considerably reduced the number of smokers. However, the sale of loose tobacco encourages tobacco use. There is limited data on compliance with section 7(2) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA), 2003, concerning the ban on loose tobacco sales in India. The aim of this study is to assess the compliance of section 7(2) of COTPA concerning the ban on loose tobacco sales in four selected cities of Karnataka. This community-based study used a cross-sectional design. Two neighboring cities, that is, district headquarter from North (Bidar and Vijayapura) and South (Mandya and Chikkamagaluru) Karnataka were considered for the study. A total of 207 vendors and 204 smokers were selected using time-cluster sampling. Data was collected using observation and interview methods. Semi-structured interview schedules were administered to smokers and vendors. Percentages and frequencies were used to describe the data. Most tobacco vendors (92%) and smokers (91%) were unaware of the loose tobacco ban. Most smokers (76%) perceive that buying cigarettes in packets would increase smoking. Most smokers (96%) prefer to buy cigarettes in loose. The sale of loose tobacco was widely prevalent (94%) in the four surveyed cities. Point of sale of loose tobacco includes tea shops (38%), petty shops (31%), pan shops (25%), and bakeries (6%). There is a high degree of noncompliance with Section 7 (2) of COTPA, 2003 regarding ban on selling loose tobacco.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Banning smoking in public places has considerably reduced the number of smokers. However, the sale of loose tobacco encourages tobacco use. There is limited data on compliance with section 7(2) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA), 2003, concerning the ban on loose tobacco sales in India. The aim of this study is to assess the compliance of section 7(2) of COTPA concerning the ban on loose tobacco sales in four selected cities of Karnataka.
Methods UNASSIGNED
This community-based study used a cross-sectional design. Two neighboring cities, that is, district headquarter from North (Bidar and Vijayapura) and South (Mandya and Chikkamagaluru) Karnataka were considered for the study. A total of 207 vendors and 204 smokers were selected using time-cluster sampling. Data was collected using observation and interview methods. Semi-structured interview schedules were administered to smokers and vendors. Percentages and frequencies were used to describe the data.
Results UNASSIGNED
Most tobacco vendors (92%) and smokers (91%) were unaware of the loose tobacco ban. Most smokers (76%) perceive that buying cigarettes in packets would increase smoking. Most smokers (96%) prefer to buy cigarettes in loose. The sale of loose tobacco was widely prevalent (94%) in the four surveyed cities. Point of sale of loose tobacco includes tea shops (38%), petty shops (31%), pan shops (25%), and bakeries (6%).
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
There is a high degree of noncompliance with Section 7 (2) of COTPA, 2003 regarding ban on selling loose tobacco.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36925494
doi: 10.1177/02537176221127139
pii: 10.1177_02537176221127139
pmc: PMC10011855
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

139-145

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

Tob Control. 2009 Dec;18(6):431-7
pubmed: 19671535
Tob Control. 2015 Jul;24 Suppl 3:iii64-iii70
pubmed: 25192772
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Jan 20;17:101055
pubmed: 32021764
Health Econ. 2008 Jun;17(6):683-93
pubmed: 17948225
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23(4):291-4
pubmed: 23322311
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Jan;15(1):83-7
pubmed: 22492083
J Urban Health. 2014 Apr;91(2):355-65
pubmed: 24500025
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):4173-6
pubmed: 23098427
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Oct 1;132(3):466-70
pubmed: 23578589
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Oct 02;12:182-185
pubmed: 30306015
Public Health. 2013 May;127(5):442-8
pubmed: 23608024
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(13):5579-82
pubmed: 26225713
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Nov 01;22(S2):51-57
pubmed: 34780138
Tob Control. 2018 Jul;27(4):407-413
pubmed: 28798264
Int Health. 2014 Sep;6(3):189-95
pubmed: 24876270
Indian J Tuberc. 2021;68S:S39-S47
pubmed: 34538389

Auteurs

Sinu Ezhumalai (S)

Dept. of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and NeuroSciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Backiyaraj Shanmugam (B)

Dept. of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and NeuroSciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Prabhat Kumar Chand (PK)

Dept. of Psychiatry, Centre for Addiction Medicine, National Institute of Mental Health and NeuroSciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Pratima Murthy (P)

Dept. of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health And NeuroSciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Classifications MeSH