Oxygen impact and reactivity trials: A new perspective on emergency response precautions.

Adiabatic Asphalt Combustible materials Combustion Emergency response Ignition LOx UVU Utah valley university impact Pressure

Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 31 08 2022
revised: 07 03 2023
accepted: 07 03 2023
entrez: 17 3 2023
pubmed: 18 3 2023
medline: 18 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The objective of this research was to verify and qualify what has been traditionally taught as fact during first responder's hazardous materials training regarding response precautions to and the likely behaviors of liquid oxygen (LOx) during a release. Subject matter experts disagreed that these precautions were well-founded in precedent or science. Findings showed that impact pressure causes a reaction in LOx and asphalt under specific conditions. These conditions are not realistic during an emergency response. No reactions were observed by combining LOx with common saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons and alcohols. No reactions were observed driving fire apparatus through a LOx pool on asphalt. No reactions were observed by combining LOx and combustible materials. No reactions were observed when spark ignition was used as a source for combustion. Pilot ignition sources were introduced directly into a LOx pool on asphalt without a significant reaction. Immediate and violent reactions were observed when pilot ignition or arc ignition was used to initiate combustion when combustible materials were in an ultra-high gaseous or liquid oxygen environment. Without flaming or arc ignition sources, no reactions were observed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36925509
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14474
pii: S2405-8440(23)01681-X
pmc: PMC10011059
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e14474

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Interface Focus. 2015 Oct 6;5(5):20150048
pubmed: 26442148

Auteurs

Andrew Byrnes (A)

Utah Valley University, Emergency Services, 3131 Mike Jense Parkway, Provo, UT 84601, USA.

Clayton Rawson (C)

Utah Valley University, Chemistry, 800 W. University Parkway, Orem, UT 84058, USA.

Brian Patchett (B)

Utah Valley University, Physics, 800 W. University Parkway, Orem, UT 84058, USA.

Daniel DeMille (D)

Utah Valley University, Utah Fire and Rescue Academy, 3131 Mike Jense Parkway, Provo, UT 84601, USA.

Merrill Halling (M)

Utah Valley University, Chemistry, 800 W. University Parkway, Orem, UT 84058, USA.

Classifications MeSH