Initial adaptation of the OnTrack coordinated specialty care model in Chile: An application of the Dynamic Adaptation Process.

Chile adaptation coordinated specialty care first episode psychosis (FEP) mental health

Journal

Frontiers in health services
ISSN: 2813-0146
Titre abrégé: Front Health Serv
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9918334887706676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 01 06 2022
accepted: 10 10 2022
pubmed: 18 3 2023
medline: 18 3 2023
entrez: 17 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In 2005, Chile became the first country in Latin America to guarantee universal free access for the diagnosis and treatment of schizophrenia. A cluster randomized control trial utilizing the Dynamic Adaptation Process framework is underway to adapt and test the OnTrack coordinated specialty care model to provide recovery-oriented, person-centered care by a multidisciplinary team for individuals with first episode psychosis (FEP) in Chile. A qualitative formative research study was conducted to inform the initial adaptation of the OnTrack Chile (OTCH) program. We conducted key informant interviews ( Participants expressed enthusiasm and support for OnTrack's recovery-oriented and person-centered principles of care. While many participants lauded the emphasis on shared decision-making and family involvement, some reported reticence, citing that it is culturally normative for patients and families to adopt a passive role in treatment. Peer specialists, and the family psychoeducation and support and supported education and employment components were perceived as aspects that could encourage the promotion of personhood and autonomy development. However, implementation challenges, including the prevailing biomedical approach, professional hierarchy, and the lack of infrastructure, human, and financial resources necessitate some modifications to these aspects. Some mental health professionals further conveyed reservations regarding the perceived hierarchical structure of the supervision model. OnTrack represents a shift from a biomedical model to a valued, aspirational, person-centered and culturally responsive model that focuses on recovery, shared decision-making and psychosocial care. With the appropriate governmental and agency-level provision of resources and modifications to some of the program components, particularly regarding the shared decision-making framework, peer specialist, family engagement, and the training supervision model, OTCH could be a transformative program for a more comprehensive, evidence-based care for individuals with FEP in Chile.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
In 2005, Chile became the first country in Latin America to guarantee universal free access for the diagnosis and treatment of schizophrenia. A cluster randomized control trial utilizing the Dynamic Adaptation Process framework is underway to adapt and test the OnTrack coordinated specialty care model to provide recovery-oriented, person-centered care by a multidisciplinary team for individuals with first episode psychosis (FEP) in Chile.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A qualitative formative research study was conducted to inform the initial adaptation of the OnTrack Chile (OTCH) program. We conducted key informant interviews (
Results UNASSIGNED
Participants expressed enthusiasm and support for OnTrack's recovery-oriented and person-centered principles of care. While many participants lauded the emphasis on shared decision-making and family involvement, some reported reticence, citing that it is culturally normative for patients and families to adopt a passive role in treatment. Peer specialists, and the family psychoeducation and support and supported education and employment components were perceived as aspects that could encourage the promotion of personhood and autonomy development. However, implementation challenges, including the prevailing biomedical approach, professional hierarchy, and the lack of infrastructure, human, and financial resources necessitate some modifications to these aspects. Some mental health professionals further conveyed reservations regarding the perceived hierarchical structure of the supervision model.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
OnTrack represents a shift from a biomedical model to a valued, aspirational, person-centered and culturally responsive model that focuses on recovery, shared decision-making and psychosocial care. With the appropriate governmental and agency-level provision of resources and modifications to some of the program components, particularly regarding the shared decision-making framework, peer specialist, family engagement, and the training supervision model, OTCH could be a transformative program for a more comprehensive, evidence-based care for individuals with FEP in Chile.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36925802
doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.958743
pmc: PMC10012675
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

958743

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Le, Choe, Burrone, Bello, Velasco, Arratia, Tal, Mascayano, Jorquera, Schilling, Ramírez, Arancibia, Fader, Conover, Susser, Dixon, Alvarado, Yang and Cabassa.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

PhuongThao D Le (PD)

School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States.

Karen Choe (K)

School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States.

María Soledad Burrone (MS)

Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de O'Higgins, Rancagua, Chile.

Iruma Bello (I)

New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.

Paola Velasco (P)

Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de O'Higgins, Rancagua, Chile.

Tamara Arratia (T)

Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de O'Higgins, Rancagua, Chile.

Danielle Tal (D)

Department of Clinical Psychology, Teachers College Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Franco Mascayano (F)

New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.
Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

María José Jorquera (MJ)

Departamento de Atención Primaria y Salud Familiar, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Sara Schilling (S)

Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Jorge Ramírez (J)

Escuela de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Diego Arancibia (D)

Escuela de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Kim Fader (K)

New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.

Sarah Conover (S)

Silberman School of Social Work, Hunter College, New York, NY, United States.

Ezra Susser (E)

New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.
Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Lisa Dixon (L)

New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.
Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policy Research & Center for Practice Innovations, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States.

Rubén Alvarado (R)

Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de O'Higgins, Rancagua, Chile.
Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Lawrence H Yang (LH)

School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Leopoldo J Cabassa (LJ)

Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, MO, United States.

Classifications MeSH