Efficacy of invisible advancement correction for mandibular retraction in adolescents based on Pancherz analysis.
Adolescent
Functional correction
Invisible appliance
Mandibular advancement
Mandibular retraction
Pancherz technology
Journal
World journal of clinical cases
ISSN: 2307-8960
Titre abrégé: World J Clin Cases
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101618806
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Feb 2023
26 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
21
10
2022
revised:
03
01
2023
accepted:
08
02
2023
entrez:
17
3
2023
pubmed:
18
3
2023
medline:
18
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mandibular retraction is the main etiological mechanism of class II malocclusion in China and the subsequent distal molar relationship can cause functional discomfort in mastication, breathing and the temporomandibular joint. The use of mandibular advancement (MA) devices has recently emerged as an adolescent mandibular retraction treatment; however, current studies regarding the effect thereof are relatively few, and there is lack of sufficient clinical support. To investigate the clinical effect of invisalign MA on the treatment of mandibular retraction in adolescents. This study included 30 adolescent patients who underwent treatment with the MA appliances from December 2017 to June 2021. The lateral cephalometric data before and after treatment were collected and imported into Dolphin Imaging software. The changes were measured by linear measurement superimposed with lateral cephalometric trajectory based on the Pancherz technology. There was no significant difference in the length and position of maxilla before and after the treatment. The position of the mandible moved 3.13 mm, the length increased 4.14 mm, the mandibular ramus length increased 4.09 mm, the body length increased 4.25 mm, and the position of the condyle moved 1.03 mm forward after treatment. Additionally, changes in the incisor sagittal position and labial inclination were observed. The position of the upper incisor point moved back 1.33 mm, without statistical difference, the inclination and tooth angle decreased by 3.44° and 4.06°, respectively; the position of the lower incisor point was moved 2.98 mm, and the inclination and tooth angle increased by 2.62° and 1.23°, respectively. Furthermore, changes in the incisor overjet and molar relationship were seen. Overjet decreased by 4.31 mm, of which 1.78 mm was due to dental factors, accounting for 41.3% of the effect as opposed to 58.7% due to skeletal factors. Molar relationship improved 3.87 mm, with 1.34 mm due to dental factors, and dental and skeletal factors were accounted for 34.6% and 65.4% of the effect, respectively. For adolescent patients with mandible retraction, invisalign MA can effectively promote the mandible growth, and it was proven to be mainly due to skeletal effects.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Mandibular retraction is the main etiological mechanism of class II malocclusion in China and the subsequent distal molar relationship can cause functional discomfort in mastication, breathing and the temporomandibular joint. The use of mandibular advancement (MA) devices has recently emerged as an adolescent mandibular retraction treatment; however, current studies regarding the effect thereof are relatively few, and there is lack of sufficient clinical support.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the clinical effect of invisalign MA on the treatment of mandibular retraction in adolescents.
METHODS
METHODS
This study included 30 adolescent patients who underwent treatment with the MA appliances from December 2017 to June 2021. The lateral cephalometric data before and after treatment were collected and imported into Dolphin Imaging software. The changes were measured by linear measurement superimposed with lateral cephalometric trajectory based on the Pancherz technology.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in the length and position of maxilla before and after the treatment. The position of the mandible moved 3.13 mm, the length increased 4.14 mm, the mandibular ramus length increased 4.09 mm, the body length increased 4.25 mm, and the position of the condyle moved 1.03 mm forward after treatment. Additionally, changes in the incisor sagittal position and labial inclination were observed. The position of the upper incisor point moved back 1.33 mm, without statistical difference, the inclination and tooth angle decreased by 3.44° and 4.06°, respectively; the position of the lower incisor point was moved 2.98 mm, and the inclination and tooth angle increased by 2.62° and 1.23°, respectively. Furthermore, changes in the incisor overjet and molar relationship were seen. Overjet decreased by 4.31 mm, of which 1.78 mm was due to dental factors, accounting for 41.3% of the effect as opposed to 58.7% due to skeletal factors. Molar relationship improved 3.87 mm, with 1.34 mm due to dental factors, and dental and skeletal factors were accounted for 34.6% and 65.4% of the effect, respectively.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
For adolescent patients with mandible retraction, invisalign MA can effectively promote the mandible growth, and it was proven to be mainly due to skeletal effects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36926124
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i6.1299
pmc: PMC10013113
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Langues
eng
Pagination
1299-1309Informations de copyright
©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Références
Dental Press J Orthod. 2020 Mar;25(2):69-85
pubmed: 32490927
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2021 Jun;22(2):119-124
pubmed: 34238001
Turk J Orthod. 2020 Jun 01;33(2):77-84
pubmed: 32637187
Angle Orthod. 2019 May;89(3):404-410
pubmed: 30605017
Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Nov 11;24(5):30-39
pubmed: 31721944
Turk J Orthod. 2019 Dec 1;32(4):241-246
pubmed: 32110470
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Jun 24;15:69
pubmed: 26104387
J Orofac Orthop. 2018 Jul;79(4):245-258
pubmed: 29663034
J Orofac Orthop. 2019 Sep;80(5):254-265
pubmed: 31444543
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 May;11(Suppl 2):S208-S215
pubmed: 31198339
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 May;20(2):111-118
pubmed: 28414870
J Orofac Orthop. 2021 May;82(3):187-197
pubmed: 33725143
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Mar-Apr;13(2):144-149
pubmed: 32742091
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Dec 01;11(12):e1093-e1098
pubmed: 31824588
Angle Orthod. 2007 Sep;77(5):907-14
pubmed: 17902235
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(1):26-30
pubmed: 33719479
Am J Orthod. 1984 Feb;85(2):125-34
pubmed: 6594053
Angle Orthod. 2015 May;85(3):480-92
pubmed: 25188504
Angle Orthod. 2015 Sep;85(5):881-9
pubmed: 25412265
Angle Orthod. 2017 May;87(3):363-370
pubmed: 28121165