Current Trends in Antifungal Prophylaxis for High-Risk Neonates in Neonatal Intensive Care Units in India: A Nationwide Survey.
antifungals
fluconazole
neonates
nicu
preterms
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
accepted:
14
03
2023
entrez:
17
3
2023
pubmed:
18
3
2023
medline:
18
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background Prophylactic antifungals are often used in high-risk babies in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to reduce invasive fungal infections (IFIs). However, existing guidelines regarding prophylactic antifungal usage do not clearly define the high-risk population. This study aimed to assess the practices related to prophylactic antifungal use in NICUs in India. Methods For this cross-sectional study, an online structured questionnaire was completed by neonatologists who worked in level 3 NICUs in 12 states in India during the period June 2022 to August 2022. Results Data from 151 NICUs were analyzed. 71.7% of respondents were from private hospitals, and 28.3% were from government hospitals. Nearly one-fourth of the units (28.5%) used antifungal prophylaxis in all extremely low birth weight (ELBW) babies, while another one-fourth (25.8%) used a case-based approach. The remaining NICUs (45.7%) did not use prophylactic antifungals. Among the users, the preferred antifungal was fluconazole; 3 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg were the dosage regimens used. The commonly used interval for administering fluconazole was 72 hours (69.2% of units). The intravenous route was the preferred route of administration (84.1%). Factors that influenced the non-users were the low incidence of fungal infections in their NICUs and concern about the development of resistance. It was noted that the users felt strongly about the need for further recommendations from pediatric societies and more studies on the efficacy of antifungals. Conclusion There is considerable variation in the use of prophylactic antifungals across NICUs in India. Among the users, uniformity in the choice of antifungal and interval of administration was observed. Further recommendations from pediatric societies, including the definitions of neonates at-risk of fungal infections, are required to ensure consistency in practice and help clinicians decide whether or not to use prophylactic antifungals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36926274
doi: 10.7759/cureus.36136
pmc: PMC10013975
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e36136Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Arun et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int J Pediatr. 2011;2011:813871
pubmed: 22121380
Acta Paediatr. 2008 Apr;97(4):430-3
pubmed: 18363952
BMC Pediatr. 2016 May 16;16:67
pubmed: 27184665
Med Mycol. 2018 Aug 1;56(6):679-686
pubmed: 29087483
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Oct;52(4):663-7
pubmed: 12972450
Yonsei Med J. 2007 Aug 31;48(4):619-26
pubmed: 17722233
Eur J Pediatr. 2012 Mar;171(3):439-45
pubmed: 21912893
Braz J Infect Dis. 2017 May - Jun;21(3):333-338
pubmed: 28286016
J Pediatr. 2013 Oct;163(4):961-7.e3
pubmed: 23726546
J Pediatr. 2017 Jun;185:129-135.e6
pubmed: 28285752
J Pediatr. 2005 Aug;147(2):172-9
pubmed: 16126045
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Dec;18 Suppl 7:38-52
pubmed: 23137136
Pediatrics. 2006 Jan;117(1):84-92
pubmed: 16396864
Pediatr Int. 2011 Aug;53(4):475-9
pubmed: 21040197
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Feb 15;62(4):e1-50
pubmed: 26679628
Pediatrics. 2006 Oct;118(4):e1019-26
pubmed: 16982807
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 24;(10):CD003850
pubmed: 26497056