Relationships reduce risks for child maltreatment: Results of an experimental trial of Infant Mental Health Home Visiting.

Brief Child Abuse Potential Inventory child abuse – prevention and control child maltreatment risk home visiting infant mental health mother-infant dyads parenting

Journal

Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 27 06 2022
accepted: 06 02 2023
entrez: 17 3 2023
pubmed: 18 3 2023
medline: 18 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Research examining the effectiveness of home visiting programs that reduce child maltreatment or associated risks yield mixed findings; some find positive significant impacts on maltreatment, whereas others find small to no effects. The Michigan Model of Infant Mental Health Home Visiting (IMH-HV) is a manualized, needs-driven, relationship-focused, home-based intervention service that significantly impacts maternal and child outcomes; the effect of this intervention on child maltreatment has not been sufficiently evaluated. The current study examined associations between treatment and dosage of IMH-HV and child abuse potential in a longitudinal, randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants included 66 mother-infant dyads (Mother Mothers completed a battery of assessments including the Brief Child Abuse Potential Inventory (BCAP) at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up assessment. Regression analyses indicated that after controlling for baseline BCAP scores, those who received any IMH-HV treatment had lower 12-month BCAP scores compared to those who received no treatment. Additionally, participation in more visits was associated with lower child abuse potential at 12 months, and a reduced likelihood of scoring in the risk range. Findings suggest that greater participation in IMH-HV is associated with decreased risk for child maltreatment 1 year after initiating treatment. IMH-HV promotes parent-clinician therapeutic alliance and provides infant-parent psychotherapy which differentiate it from traditional home visiting programs.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Research examining the effectiveness of home visiting programs that reduce child maltreatment or associated risks yield mixed findings; some find positive significant impacts on maltreatment, whereas others find small to no effects. The Michigan Model of Infant Mental Health Home Visiting (IMH-HV) is a manualized, needs-driven, relationship-focused, home-based intervention service that significantly impacts maternal and child outcomes; the effect of this intervention on child maltreatment has not been sufficiently evaluated.
Objective UNASSIGNED
The current study examined associations between treatment and dosage of IMH-HV and child abuse potential in a longitudinal, randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Participants and setting UNASSIGNED
Participants included 66 mother-infant dyads (Mother
Methods UNASSIGNED
Mothers completed a battery of assessments including the Brief Child Abuse Potential Inventory (BCAP) at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up assessment.
Results UNASSIGNED
Regression analyses indicated that after controlling for baseline BCAP scores, those who received any IMH-HV treatment had lower 12-month BCAP scores compared to those who received no treatment. Additionally, participation in more visits was associated with lower child abuse potential at 12 months, and a reduced likelihood of scoring in the risk range.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Findings suggest that greater participation in IMH-HV is associated with decreased risk for child maltreatment 1 year after initiating treatment. IMH-HV promotes parent-clinician therapeutic alliance and provides infant-parent psychotherapy which differentiate it from traditional home visiting programs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36926461
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.979740
pmc: PMC10012869
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

979740

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Julian, Riggs, Wong, Lawler, Brophy-Herb, Ribaudo, Stacks, Jester, Pitzen, Rosenblum and Muzik.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Mar;32(3):295-315
pubmed: 18377991
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Feb;64:47-60
pubmed: 28027464
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Mar;101:104332
pubmed: 31926458
J Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 1975 Summer;14(3):387-421
pubmed: 1141566
Attach Hum Dev. 2022 Feb;24(1):53-75
pubmed: 33427582
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):295
pubmed: 35241062
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Jun 1;68(6):535-538
pubmed: 28412898
Child Abuse Negl. 2007 Aug;31(8):801-27
pubmed: 17822764
Child Abuse Negl. 2016 Mar;53:64-80
pubmed: 26724823
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016 Oct;17(4):366-86
pubmed: 27580663
PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001349
pubmed: 23209385
Infant Ment Health J. 2019 Jul;40(4):523-540
pubmed: 31095763
Infant Behav Dev. 2017 Feb;46:14-32
pubmed: 27870988
Child Maltreat. 2018 Nov;23(4):365-375
pubmed: 30037281
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1986 Dec;54(6):865-6
pubmed: 3794036
Infant Ment Health J. 2020 Mar;41(2):166-177
pubmed: 32242955
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2005 Jun;34(2):301-11
pubmed: 15901230
Psychol Med. 2016 Mar;46(4):717-30
pubmed: 26708271
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 16;22(1):1361
pubmed: 36384551
Infant Ment Health J. 2020 Mar;41(2):178-190
pubmed: 32242953
Infant Ment Health J. 2005 Nov;26(6):504-520
pubmed: 28682485
Infant Ment Health J. 2015 Jul-Aug;36(4):353-65
pubmed: 26118949
Infant Ment Health J. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):200-12
pubmed: 25694333
Science. 2015 Mar 27;347(6229):1480-5
pubmed: 25814584
Am J Prev Med. 1998 May;14(4):245-58
pubmed: 9635069
Dev Psychopathol. 2019 Feb;31(1):173-187
pubmed: 30757987
Infant Ment Health J. 2020 Mar;41(2):206-219
pubmed: 32242965

Auteurs

Megan M Julian (MM)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Jessica Riggs (J)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Kristyn Wong (K)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Jamie M Lawler (JM)

Department of Psychology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, United States.

Holly E Brophy-Herb (HE)

Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.

Julie Ribaudo (J)

School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.

Ann Stacks (A)

Merrill Palmer Skillman Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.

Jennifer M Jester (JM)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Jerrica Pitzen (J)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Katherine L Rosenblum (KL)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Maria Muzik (M)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Classifications MeSH