Strategies to reduce low-value care - An applied behavior analysis using a single-case design.
applied behavior analysis (ABA)
de-implementation
low-value care
physicians
primary care (MeSH)
single-case design
Journal
Frontiers in health services
ISSN: 2813-0146
Titre abrégé: Front Health Serv
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9918334887706676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
15
11
2022
accepted:
10
02
2023
entrez:
17
3
2023
pubmed:
18
3
2023
medline:
18
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Implementation science has traditionally focused on the implementation of evidence-based practices, but the field has increasingly recognized the importance of addressing de-implementation (i.e., the process of reducing low-value care). Most studies on de-implementation strategies have used a combination of strategies without addressing factors that sustain the use of LVC and there is a lack of information about which strategies are most effective and what mechanisms of change might underlie these strategies. Applied behavior analysis is an approach that could be a potential method to gain insights into the mechanisms of de-implementation strategies to reduce LVC. Three research questions are addressed in this study: What contingencies (three-term contingencies or rule-governing behavior) related to the use of LVC can be found in a local context and what strategies can be developed based on an analysis of these contingencies?; Do these strategies change targeted behaviors?; How do the participants describe the strategies' contingencies and the feasibility of the applied behavior analysis approach? In this study, we used applied behavior analysis to analyze contingencies that maintain behaviors related to a chosen LVC, the unnecessary use of x-rays for knee arthrosis within a primary care center. Based on this analysis, strategies were developed and evaluated using a single-case design and a qualitative analysis of interview data. Two strategies were developed: a lecture and feedback meetings. The results from the single-case data were inconclusive but some of the findings may indicate a behavior change in the expected direction. Such a conclusion is supported by interview data showing that participants perceived an effect in response to both strategies. The findings illustrate how applied behavior analysis can be used to analyze contingencies related to the use of LVC and to design strategies for de-implementation. It also shows an effect of the targeted behaviors even though the quantitative results are inconclusive. The strategies used in this study could be further improved to target the contingencies better by structuring the feedback meetings better and including more precise feedback.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36926508
doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1099538
pmc: PMC10012739
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1099538Informations de copyright
© 2023 Ingvarsson, Sandaker, Nilsen, Hasson, Augustsson and von Thiele Schwarz.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Nov 15;19:70
pubmed: 22085585
BMC Med. 2018 Jun 13;16(1):82
pubmed: 29895295
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 27;17(1):73
pubmed: 36303219
Qual Health Res. 2020 Apr;30(5):783-792
pubmed: 31830860
Front Public Health. 2018 May 07;6:136
pubmed: 29868544
Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Oct;74(5):507-550
pubmed: 27402662
Implement Sci. 2012 May 31;7:50
pubmed: 22651257
Implement Res Pract. 2020 Sep 18;1:2633489520953762
pubmed: 37089121
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 17;10:51
pubmed: 25928695
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jun 25;3(1):69
pubmed: 35752858
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 30;10(10):e040025
pubmed: 33127636
Can J Occup Ther. 2016 Jun;83(3):184-95
pubmed: 27231387
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Aug 15;14(1):63
pubmed: 27527079
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jan 1;158(1):55-9
pubmed: 23108285
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Oct;24(10):611-4
pubmed: 26152137
Am Psychol. 2008 Apr;63(3):146-59
pubmed: 18377105
Implement Sci. 2006 Feb 23;1:4
pubmed: 16722571
Implement Sci. 2018 Oct 29;13(1):134
pubmed: 30373635
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 29;14(1):42
pubmed: 31036028
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 15;14:218
pubmed: 24885212
Healthc (Amst). 2017 Mar;5(1-2):17-22
pubmed: 28668198
Implement Sci. 2020 Oct 21;15(1):93
pubmed: 33087154
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Summer;43(2):195-213
pubmed: 21119895
Ethn Dis. 2017 Dec 7;27(4):463-468
pubmed: 29225448
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Sep;54(4):1514-1525
pubmed: 34289103
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Nov 01;30(9):736-739
pubmed: 29741672
Implement Sci. 2020 May 25;15(1):38
pubmed: 32450898
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 May 8;30(4):319-326
pubmed: 28470130
Implement Sci. 2022 Mar 12;17(1):24
pubmed: 35279182
Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12
pubmed: 14769454
Lancet. 2017 Jul 8;390(10090):156-168
pubmed: 28077234
Implement Sci. 2020 Apr 16;15(1):21
pubmed: 32299461
JBI Evid Implement. 2023 Jun 01;21(2):115-119
pubmed: 36375013
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Feb 04;2(1):13
pubmed: 33541443
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21
pubmed: 25889199