Time Utilization Among Immunization Clinics Using an Electronic Immunization Registry (Part 2): Time and Motion Study of Modified User Workflows.
digital health intervention
electronic immunization registry
immunizations
mixed methods evaluation
time and motion
workflow
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Mar 2023
16 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
23
05
2022
accepted:
12
12
2022
revised:
28
11
2022
entrez:
17
3
2023
pubmed:
18
3
2023
medline:
18
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Digital health interventions have the potential to improve the provision of health care services through digitized data collection and management. Low- and middle-income countries are beginning to introduce electronic immunization registries (EIRs) into their routine immunization services to better capture and store childhood vaccination information. Especially in Africa, where 25% of children remain unimmunized or underimmunized, technologies that can help identify children due for a vaccination are particularly important for improving vaccination coverage. However, an improved understanding of the effectiveness of these systems is needed to develop and deploy sustainable EIRs in low- and middle-income countries. We conducted an interventional pretest-posttest design study that sought to improve time efficiency through workflow modifications in Kenyan immunization clinics. Our aim was to describe how activity times differed after introducing workflow modifications that could potentially reduce the time needed to perform routine data entry activities. Our intent was to demonstrate changes in efficiency when moving from the existing dual-data entry workflow to a future paperless workflow by health facility size and experience length of health care workers (HCWs). We tested how 3 workflow modifications would affect time utilization among HCWs using the EIR at the point of care compared with baseline immunization clinic workflows. Our outcome of interest was the time taken to complete individual activities and a patient's total time in the clinic where we compared the time spent during the baseline workflow with that during the modified workflow. We used a standardized tool to observe and document the immunization clinic workflow. To estimate differences in time utilization, we used bivariate analyses and fit multivariate linear mixed-effects models. Our study found that for HCWs using an EIR, the introduction of modified workflows decreased the amount of time needed to provide services to children seen in the immunization clinic. With a baseline mean time of 10 minutes spent per child, this decreased by about 3 minutes when the preparation modification was introduced and almost 5 minutes for the paperless and combined modifications. Results pertaining to the EIR's performance and ability to connect to the internet were particularly insightful about potential causes of delays. We were able to conduct a concise clinical simulation exercise by introducing modified workflows and estimating their impact on time utilization in immunization clinics using an EIR. We found that the paperless workflow provided the largest time savings when delivering services, although this was threatened by poor EIR performance and internet connectivity. This study demonstrated that not only should digital health interventions be built and adapted for particular use cases but existing user workflows also need to adapt to new technology.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Digital health interventions have the potential to improve the provision of health care services through digitized data collection and management. Low- and middle-income countries are beginning to introduce electronic immunization registries (EIRs) into their routine immunization services to better capture and store childhood vaccination information. Especially in Africa, where 25% of children remain unimmunized or underimmunized, technologies that can help identify children due for a vaccination are particularly important for improving vaccination coverage. However, an improved understanding of the effectiveness of these systems is needed to develop and deploy sustainable EIRs in low- and middle-income countries.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
We conducted an interventional pretest-posttest design study that sought to improve time efficiency through workflow modifications in Kenyan immunization clinics. Our aim was to describe how activity times differed after introducing workflow modifications that could potentially reduce the time needed to perform routine data entry activities. Our intent was to demonstrate changes in efficiency when moving from the existing dual-data entry workflow to a future paperless workflow by health facility size and experience length of health care workers (HCWs).
METHODS
METHODS
We tested how 3 workflow modifications would affect time utilization among HCWs using the EIR at the point of care compared with baseline immunization clinic workflows. Our outcome of interest was the time taken to complete individual activities and a patient's total time in the clinic where we compared the time spent during the baseline workflow with that during the modified workflow. We used a standardized tool to observe and document the immunization clinic workflow. To estimate differences in time utilization, we used bivariate analyses and fit multivariate linear mixed-effects models.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Our study found that for HCWs using an EIR, the introduction of modified workflows decreased the amount of time needed to provide services to children seen in the immunization clinic. With a baseline mean time of 10 minutes spent per child, this decreased by about 3 minutes when the preparation modification was introduced and almost 5 minutes for the paperless and combined modifications. Results pertaining to the EIR's performance and ability to connect to the internet were particularly insightful about potential causes of delays.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We were able to conduct a concise clinical simulation exercise by introducing modified workflows and estimating their impact on time utilization in immunization clinics using an EIR. We found that the paperless workflow provided the largest time savings when delivering services, although this was threatened by poor EIR performance and internet connectivity. This study demonstrated that not only should digital health interventions be built and adapted for particular use cases but existing user workflows also need to adapt to new technology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36927606
pii: v7i1e39777
doi: 10.2196/39777
pmc: PMC10019767
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e39777Informations de copyright
©Samantha B Dolan, Rachel Wittenauer, Anne Njoroge, Penina Onyango, George Owiso, Jessica C Shearer, William B Lober, Shan Liu, Nancy Puttkammer, Peter Rabinowitz. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 16.03.2023.
Références
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 1;12(11):e0186744
pubmed: 29091935
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Sep-Oct;12(5):505-16
pubmed: 15905487
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jan;32(1):63-8
pubmed: 23297272
Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:227-46
pubmed: 12668757
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Sep 20;1:48
pubmed: 31304327
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):704-10
pubmed: 21527407
J Stat Softw. 2013 Sep;54(10):
pubmed: 24403868
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Aug 27;3:110
pubmed: 32904379
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Dec;82 Suppl 3:S230-S243
pubmed: 31764259
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Mar;30(3):464-71
pubmed: 21383365
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Jan 09;6:3
pubmed: 16401336
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 14;7:e39775
pubmed: 36917157
Front Public Health. 2019 Aug 07;7:218
pubmed: 31440494
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Nov-Dec;20(6):1150-8
pubmed: 23715803
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 30;7:e39383
pubmed: 36995755
PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 18;8(1):e1000387
pubmed: 21267058
CMAJ. 2014 Oct 21;186(15):1134-5
pubmed: 25183722
Euro Surveill. 2012 Apr 19;17(16):
pubmed: 22551460