Delivering clinical studies of exercise in the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges and adaptations using a feasibility trial of isometric exercise to treat hypertension as an exemplar.
Clinical trials
Hypertension
SPORTS MEDICINE
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 03 2023
17 03 2023
Historique:
entrez:
17
3
2023
pubmed:
18
3
2023
medline:
22
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted on the delivery of clinical trials in the UK, posing complicated organisational challenges and requiring adaptations, especially to exercise intervention studies based in the community. We aim to identify the challenges of public involvement, recruitment, consent, follow-up, intervention and the healthcare professional delivery aspects of a feasibility study of exercise in hypertensive primary care patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. While these challenges elicited many reactive changes which were specific to, and only relevant in the context of 'lockdown' requirements, some of the protocol developments that came about during this unprecedented period have great potential to inform more permanent practices for carrying out this type of research. To this end, we detail the necessary adaptations to many elements of the feasibility study and critically reflect on our approach to redesigning and amending this ongoing project in order to maintain its viability to date. Some of the more major protocol adaptations, such as moving the study to remote means wherever possible, had further unforeseen and undesirable outcomes (eg, additional appointments) with regards to extra resources required to deliver the study. However, other changes improved the efficiency of the study, such as the remote informed consent and the direct advertising with prescreening survey. The adaptations to the study have clear links to the UK Plan for the future of research delivery. It is intended that this specific documentation and critical evaluation will help those planning or delivering similar studies to do so in a more resource efficient and effective way. In conclusion, it is essential to reflect and respond with protocol changes in the current climate in order to deliver clinical research successfully, as in the case of this particular study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36931669
pii: bmjopen-2022-068204
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068204
pmc: PMC10030278
doi:
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN13472393']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e068204Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR200485
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: PAS has received speaker honorarium from AstraZeneca & Bayer and is a Trustee of the charities Blood Pressure UK and British and Irish Hypertension Society. No conflicts of interest/competing interests were declared by any of the other authors.
Références
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Sep;8:100217
pubmed: 34514457
Clin Trials. 2012 Apr;9(2):198-203
pubmed: 22308560
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021 Jun 02;7(2):e001050
pubmed: 34150320
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 22;22(4):1271-1278
pubmed: 34957769
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022 May;75(5):429
pubmed: 35525570
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Aug 29;14:128
pubmed: 23987804
Blood Press Monit. 2010 Feb;15(1):49-54
pubmed: 20032779
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Jan;117(1):83-93
pubmed: 27853886
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Aug 15;26(16):4198-4200
pubmed: 32503806
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 01;11(6):e0155677
pubmed: 27249056
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Oct 28;7(1):192
pubmed: 34711266