Estimated COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against seroconversion from SARS-CoV-2 Infection, March-October, 2021.
Adults
COVID-19
COVID-19 vaccines
SARS-CoV-2
Serology
Vaccine effectiveness
Journal
Vaccine
ISSN: 1873-2518
Titre abrégé: Vaccine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8406899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 04 2023
06 04 2023
Historique:
received:
12
12
2022
revised:
02
03
2023
accepted:
03
03
2023
medline:
4
4
2023
pubmed:
18
3
2023
entrez:
17
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Monitoring the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infections remains important to inform public health responses. Estimation of vaccine effectiveness (VE) against serological evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection might provide an alternative measure of the benefit of vaccination against infection. We estimated mRNA COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against development of SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid antibodies in March-October 2021, during which the Delta variant became predominant. Participants were enrolled from four participating healthcare systems in the United States, and completed electronic surveys that included vaccination history. Dried blood spot specimens collected on a monthly basis were analyzed for anti-spike antibodies, and, if positive, anti-nucleocapsid antibodies. We used detection of new anti-nucleocapsid antibodies to indicate SARS-CoV-2 infection, and estimated VE by comparing 154 case-participants with new detection of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies to 1,540 seronegative control-participants matched by calendar period. Using conditional logistic regression, we estimated VE ≥ 14 days after the 2nd dose of an mRNA vaccine compared with no receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine dose, adjusting for age group, healthcare worker occupation, urban/suburban/rural residence, healthcare system region, and reported contact with a person testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. Among individuals who completed a primary series, estimated VE against seroconversion from SARS-CoV-2 infection was 88.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79.6%-93.9%) after any mRNA vaccine, 87.8% (95% CI, 75.9%-93.8%) after BioNTech vaccine and 91.7% (95% CI, 75.7%-97.2%) after Moderna vaccine. VE was estimated to be lower ≥ 3 months after dose 2 compared with < 3 months after dose 2, and among participants who were older or had underlying health conditions, although confidence intervals overlapped between subgroups. VE estimates generated using infection-induced antibodies were consistent with published estimates from clinical trials and observational studies that used virologic tests to confirm infection during the same period. Our findings support recommendations for eligible adults to remain up to date with COVID-19 vaccination.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Monitoring the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infections remains important to inform public health responses. Estimation of vaccine effectiveness (VE) against serological evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection might provide an alternative measure of the benefit of vaccination against infection.
METHODS
We estimated mRNA COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against development of SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid antibodies in March-October 2021, during which the Delta variant became predominant. Participants were enrolled from four participating healthcare systems in the United States, and completed electronic surveys that included vaccination history. Dried blood spot specimens collected on a monthly basis were analyzed for anti-spike antibodies, and, if positive, anti-nucleocapsid antibodies. We used detection of new anti-nucleocapsid antibodies to indicate SARS-CoV-2 infection, and estimated VE by comparing 154 case-participants with new detection of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies to 1,540 seronegative control-participants matched by calendar period. Using conditional logistic regression, we estimated VE ≥ 14 days after the 2nd dose of an mRNA vaccine compared with no receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine dose, adjusting for age group, healthcare worker occupation, urban/suburban/rural residence, healthcare system region, and reported contact with a person testing positive for SARS-CoV-2.
RESULTS
Among individuals who completed a primary series, estimated VE against seroconversion from SARS-CoV-2 infection was 88.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79.6%-93.9%) after any mRNA vaccine, 87.8% (95% CI, 75.9%-93.8%) after BioNTech vaccine and 91.7% (95% CI, 75.7%-97.2%) after Moderna vaccine. VE was estimated to be lower ≥ 3 months after dose 2 compared with < 3 months after dose 2, and among participants who were older or had underlying health conditions, although confidence intervals overlapped between subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS
VE estimates generated using infection-induced antibodies were consistent with published estimates from clinical trials and observational studies that used virologic tests to confirm infection during the same period. Our findings support recommendations for eligible adults to remain up to date with COVID-19 vaccination.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36932031
pii: S0264-410X(23)00253-0
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.006
pmc: PMC9995303
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2596-2604Informations de copyright
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [Roberto P. Santos has received honoraria and/or travel grants from the American Board of Pediatrics (2020–2025), the American Academy of Pediatrics (2022), and the Mississippi Osteopathic Medicine Association (2022) 2022. Dr. Santos is also site principal investigator/coordinator for a contract awarded to the University of Mississippi Medical Center (UMMC) with Eli Lilly, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), and the Health Resources and Services Administration (2020–2021).].
Références
Lancet. 2021 Oct 16;398(10309):1407-1416
pubmed: 34619098
Lancet. 2022 Mar 5;399(10328):924-944
pubmed: 35202601
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jun 24;10(7):
pubmed: 35891180
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Sep 24;70(38):1344-1348
pubmed: 34555007
Nat Med. 2020 Nov;26(11):1691-1693
pubmed: 32929268
Science. 2022 Jan 07;375(6576):43-50
pubmed: 34812653
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Jul;10(7):689-699
pubmed: 35468336
JAMA. 2021 Oct 12;326(14):1400-1409
pubmed: 34473201
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Sep;175(9):1258-1265
pubmed: 35785530
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4;385(19):1774-1785
pubmed: 34551225
Epidemiology. 2021 Jul 1;32(4):508-517
pubmed: 34001753
Epidemiology. 2019 Nov;30(6):838-844
pubmed: 31430265
Sci Adv. 2021 Jul 30;7(31):
pubmed: 34330709
Biol Methods Protoc. 2022 Nov 28;7(1):bpac033
pubmed: 36589317
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Feb 18;71(7):255-263
pubmed: 35176007
J Infect Dis. 2011 May 1;203(9):1309-15
pubmed: 21378375
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 May;21(5):629-636
pubmed: 33545090
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;21(4):e75-e76
pubmed: 32763195
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0124521
pubmed: 34908472
mBio. 2022 Jan 25;13(1):e0214121
pubmed: 35073738
Nat Rev Immunol. 2021 Jun;21(6):395-404
pubmed: 33927374
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 6;17(12):e0278624
pubmed: 36473010
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4;385(19):1761-1773
pubmed: 34525277
J Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 1;226(9):1556-1561
pubmed: 35921537
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 24;191(5):800-811
pubmed: 35081612
Science. 2022 Mar 11;375(6585):1155-1159
pubmed: 35084938
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 7;385(15):1431-1433
pubmed: 34496195
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Apr 2;21(1):62
pubmed: 33810785
Emerg Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;28(3):672-683
pubmed: 35202525
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Aug;28:101857
pubmed: 35706687
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Sep 17;70(37):1284-1290
pubmed: 34529637
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 16;385(25):e90
pubmed: 34551224
Lancet. 2020 Nov 14;396(10262):1595-1606
pubmed: 33065034
Nat Med. 2021 Apr;27(4):601-615
pubmed: 33753937