ICU health care workers opinion on physician-assisted-suicide and euthanasia: a French survey.

Euthanasia Intensive Care Unit Physician-assisted suicide

Journal

Annals of intensive care
ISSN: 2110-5820
Titre abrégé: Ann Intensive Care
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101562873

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 29 12 2022
accepted: 20 02 2023
entrez: 18 3 2023
pubmed: 19 3 2023
medline: 19 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In France, physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia are not legal but are still debated. French intensive care unit (ICU) health care workers (HCWs) have an insider's perspective on the global quality of the patient's end-of-life, whether it occurs in ICU or not. However, their opinion about euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide remains unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the opinion of French ICU HCWs about physician-assisted suicide/euthanasia. A total of 1149 ICU HCWs participated to a self-administered anonymous questionnaire: 411 (35.8%) physicians and 738 (64.2%) non-physicians. Among them, 76.5% indicated they were in favor of legalizing euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide. Non-physicians HCWs were significantly more in favor of the legalization of euthanasia/physician assisted suicide than physicians (87% vs 57.8% p < 0.001). Euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide of an ICU patient raised the most important difference in positive judgment between physicians and non-physicians HCWs (80.3% vs 42.2%; p < 0.001 of non-physicians and physicians, respectively). The questionnaire included three case vignettes of concrete examples which participated to the increase in the rate of response in favor of euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide legalization (76.5-82.9%; p < 0.001). Keeping in mind the unknown representation of our sample, ICU HCWs, particularly non physicians, would be in favor of a law legalizing euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In France, physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia are not legal but are still debated. French intensive care unit (ICU) health care workers (HCWs) have an insider's perspective on the global quality of the patient's end-of-life, whether it occurs in ICU or not. However, their opinion about euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide remains unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the opinion of French ICU HCWs about physician-assisted suicide/euthanasia.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 1149 ICU HCWs participated to a self-administered anonymous questionnaire: 411 (35.8%) physicians and 738 (64.2%) non-physicians. Among them, 76.5% indicated they were in favor of legalizing euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide. Non-physicians HCWs were significantly more in favor of the legalization of euthanasia/physician assisted suicide than physicians (87% vs 57.8% p < 0.001). Euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide of an ICU patient raised the most important difference in positive judgment between physicians and non-physicians HCWs (80.3% vs 42.2%; p < 0.001 of non-physicians and physicians, respectively). The questionnaire included three case vignettes of concrete examples which participated to the increase in the rate of response in favor of euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide legalization (76.5-82.9%; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Keeping in mind the unknown representation of our sample, ICU HCWs, particularly non physicians, would be in favor of a law legalizing euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36933060
doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01114-z
pii: 10.1186/s13613-023-01114-z
pmc: PMC10024783
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

19

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

BMJ. 2003 Sep 13;327(7415):595-6
pubmed: 12969926
Heart Lung. 2015 May-Jun;44(3):260-3
pubmed: 25840865
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Nov 05;14:59
pubmed: 26542685
J Crit Care. 2014 Feb;29(1):174-5
pubmed: 24210357
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Apr 27;17(1):24
pubmed: 27121374
J Med Ethics. 2007 Dec;33(12):708-11
pubmed: 18055901
Crit Care Med. 2022 May 1;50(5):742-749
pubmed: 34605780
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Dec;43(12):1793-1807
pubmed: 28936597
N Z Med J. 2017 Jun 2;130(1456):10-26
pubmed: 28571045

Auteurs

Mathieu Acquier (M)

Intensive Care Medicine, CHU de Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France.

Alexandre Boyer (A)

Intensive Care Medicine, CHU de Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France. alexandre.boyer@chu-bordeaux.fr.

Bertrand Guidet (B)

Intensive Care Medicine, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 75012, Paris, France.

Alexandre Lautrette (A)

Intensive Care Medicine, Montpied Teaching Hospital, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Jean Reignier (J)

Intensive Care Medicine, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Movement-Interactions-Performance, MIP, UR 4334, Nantes Université, 44000, Nantes, France.

Guillaume Thiery (G)

Intensive Care Medicine, CHU de Saint Etienne, Jean Monnet Université, Saint-Étienne, France.
Research on Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.

René Robert (R)

CIC Inserm 1402, CHU Poitiers, University of Poitiers, 86000, Poitiers, France.

Classifications MeSH