The influence of different storage media on Vickers hardness and surface roughness of CAD/CAM resin composites.
Journal
Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine
ISSN: 1573-4838
Titre abrégé: J Mater Sci Mater Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9013087
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Mar 2023
18 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
16
08
2022
accepted:
17
02
2023
entrez:
19
3
2023
pubmed:
20
3
2023
medline:
22
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study examined Vickers hardness as well as surface characteristics of different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) resin composites prior to and after storage in various media. CAD/CAM resin composite blocks (Grandio Blocs (GB), Lava Ultimate (LU), Brilliant Crios (BC), Cerasmart (GC), Shofu Block HC (SB), Tetric CAD (TC), Luxacam Composite (LC); incl. different translucency variants) were prepared, polished and surface free energy was determined. The specimens were divided into four groups: dry conditions for 24 h (25 °C), demineralized water (37 °C), Pepsi Cola (37 °C) and 75% ethanol (37 °C). After seven and 28 days of storage, Vickers hardness was determined. Surface roughness was measured after the entire storage period. Vickers hardness was in the range of about 150 HV for GB, around 115 HV for LU, and 80-100 HV for BC, GC, SB, TC and LC. Only minor differences (total: 50.2 (6.4)-56.2 (3.2) mN/m) in surface free energy could be detected. No relationship was observed between surface free energy and filler content. However, a correlation between filler content and Vickers hardness was evident. Artificial aging caused a decrease of Vickers hardness (up to -40 HV or 35%) depending on storage media, duration and material. The changes in surface texture after immersion in different media were below a value of ΔSa = 0.015 µm. Artificial aging of CAD/CAM resin composites leads to a significant decrease of Vickers hardness for most materials, while only small changes in surface roughness were identified.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36934208
doi: 10.1007/s10856-023-06713-7
pii: 10.1007/s10856-023-06713-7
pmc: PMC10024666
doi:
Substances chimiques
Composite Resins
0
Dental Materials
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC, Dewael TY, Sadoun MJ. From artisanal to CAD-CAM blocks: state of the art of indirect composites. J Dent Res. 2016;95:487–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516634286
doi: 10.1177/0022034516634286
Lambert H, Durand J-C, Jacquot B, Fages M. Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: State of the art. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9:486–95. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.486
doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.486
Nguyen J-F, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater. 2012;28:529–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.003
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.003
Ionescu AC, Hahnel S, König A, Brambilla E. Resin composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications reduce biofilm formation in vitro. Dent Mater. 2020;36:603–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.03.016
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.03.016
Azeem RA, Sureshbabu NM. Clinical performance of direct versus indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21:2–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_213_16
doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_213_16
Koenig A, Schmidtke J, Schmohl L, Schneider-Feyrer S, Rosentritt M, Hoelzig H, et al. Characterisation of the Filler Fraction in CAD/CAM resin-based composites. Materials (Basel). 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14081986
Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020
Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO. Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2016;32:e275–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.222
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.222
Hampe R, Lümkemann N, Sener B, Stawarczyk B. The effect of artificial aging on Martens hardness and indentation modulus of different dental CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;86:191–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.06.028
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.06.028
Alamoush RA, Silikas N, Salim NA, Al-Nasrawi S, Satterthwaite JD. Effect of the composition of CAD/CAM composite blocks on mechanical properties. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:4893143 https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4893143
doi: 10.1155/2018/4893143
Stawarczyk B, Özcan M, Trottmann A, Schmutz F, Roos M, Hämmerle C. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109:325–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60309-1
doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60309-1
Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Oki M, Arksornnukit M, Kanehira M, Finger WJ. In vitro evaluation of the wear resistance of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J. 2015;34:495–502. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-293
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2014-293
Hensel F, Koenig A, Doerfler H-M, Fuchs F, Rosentritt M, Hahnel S. CAD/CAM resin-based composites for use in long-term temporary fixed dental prostheses. Polym (Basel). 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13203469
doi: 10.3390/polym13203469
Okada R, Asakura M, Ando A, Kumano H, Ban S, Kawai T, et al. Fracture strength testing of crowns made of CAD/CAM composite resins. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62:287–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.10.003
doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.10.003
Miura S, Fujisawa M. Current status and perspective of CAD/CAM-produced resin composite crowns: a review of clinical effectiveness. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020;56:184–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.10.002
doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.10.002
Souza J, Fuentes MV, Baena E, Ceballos L. One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays. Odontology. 2021;109:259–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00539-3
doi: 10.1007/s10266-020-00539-3
Zimmermann M, Koller C, Reymus M, Mehl A, Hickel R. Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Particle-Filled Composite Resin CAD/CAM Partial Crowns after 24 Months. J Prosthodont. 2018;27:694–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12582
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12582
Miura S, Kasahara S, Yamauchi S, Katsuda Y, Harada A, Aida J, et al. A possible risk of CAD/CAM-produced composite resin premolar crowns on a removable partial denture abutment tooth: a 3-year retrospective cohort study. J Prosthodont Res. 2019;63:78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2018.08.005
doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.08.005
Larsen IB, Freund M, Munksgaard EC. Change in surface hardness of BisGMA/TEGDMA polymer due to enzymatic action. J Dent Res. 1992;71:1851–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710111701
doi: 10.1177/00220345920710111701
Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999;27:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2
doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2
Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005;21:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.001
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.001
Alshabib A, Silikas N, Watts DC. Hardness and fracture toughness of resin-composite materials with and without fibers. Dent Mater. 2019;35:1194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.05.017
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.05.017
Sunbul HA, Silikas N, Watts DC. Surface and bulk properties of dental resin- composites after solvent storage. Dent Mater. 2016;32:987–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.05.007
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.05.007
Hahnel S, Henrich A, Bürgers R, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Investigation of mechanical properties of modern dental composites after artificial aging for one year. Oper Dent. 2010;35:412–9. https://doi.org/10.2341/09-337-L
doi: 10.2341/09-337-L
Pilliar RM, Vowles R, Williams DF. The effect of environmental aging on the fracture toughness of dental composites. J Dent Res. 1987;66:722–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660030301
doi: 10.1177/00220345870660030301
Al Badr RM, Abu Hassan H. Effect of immersion in different media on the mechanical properties of dental composite resins. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2017;3:81–8
Heintze SD, Ilie N, Hickel R, Reis A, Loguercio A, Rousson V. Laboratory mechanical parameters of composite resins and their relation to fractures and wear in clinical trials-A systematic review. Dent Mater. 2017;33:e101–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.013
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.013
Söderholm KJ. Degradation of glass filler in experimental composites. J Dent Res. 1981;60:1867–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345810600110701
doi: 10.1177/00220345810600110701
Ferracane JL, Berge HX. Fracture toughness of experimental dental composites aged in ethanol. J Dent Res. 1995;74:1418–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740071501
doi: 10.1177/00220345950740071501
Attia A, Abdelaziz KM, Freitag S, Kern M. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95:117–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.014
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.014
Lucsanszky IJR, Ruse ND. Fracture toughness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus of new CAD/CAM resin composite blocks. J Prosthodont. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13123
Colombo M, Poggio C, Lasagna A, Chiesa M, Scribante A. Vickers micro-hardness of new restorative CAD/CAM dental materials: evaluation and comparison after exposure to acidic drink. Materials. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12081246
Ilie N. Altering of optical and mechanical properties in high-translucent CAD-CAM resin composites during aging. J Dent. 2019;85:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.05.015
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.05.015
Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB. Dental caries. Lancet. 2007;369:51–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2
Ramseier CA, Anerud A, Dulac M, Lulic M, Cullinan MP, Seymour GJ, et al. Natural history of periodontitis: Disease progression and tooth loss over 40 years. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44:1182–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12782
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12782
Müller F. Oral hygiene reduces the mortality from aspiration pneumonia in frail elders. J Dent Res. 2015;94:14S–16S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514552494
doi: 10.1177/0022034514552494
Pasmore M, Todd P, Pfiefer B, Rhodes M, Bowman CN. Effect of polymer surface properties on the reversibility of attachment of pseudomonas aeruginosa in the early stages of biofilm development. Biofouling. 2002;18:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010290017743
doi: 10.1080/08927010290017743
von Fraunhofer JA, Loewy ZG. Factors involved in microbial colonization of oral prostheses. Gen Dent. 2009;57:136–43. quiz 144-5
Anselme K, Davidson P, Popa AM, Giazzon M, Liley M, Ploux L. The interaction of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the nanometre scale. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3824–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.001
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.001
Teughels W, van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:68–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x
Bollen CML, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997;13:258–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3
doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3
Dezelic T, Guggenheim B, Schmidlin PR. Multi-species biofilm formation on dental materials and an adhesive patch. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2009;7:47–53
Ikeda M, Matin K, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites. Dent Mater J. 2007;26:915–23. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.915
doi: 10.4012/dmj.26.915
Contreras-Guerrero P, Ortiz-Magdaleno M, Urcuyo-Alvarado MS, Cepeda-Bravo JA, Leyva-Del Rio D, Pérez-López JE, et al. Effect of dental restorative materials surface roughness on the in vitro biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans biofilm. Am J Dent. 2020;33:59–63.
Alamoush RA, Sung R, Satterthwaite JD, Silikas N. The effect of different storage media on the monomer elution and hardness of CAD/CAM composite blocks. Dent Mater. 2021;37:1202–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.04.009
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.04.009
ISO 6872:2015 + Amd.1:2018. Dentistry - Ceramic materials. Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH. https://doi.org/10.31030/2860803
ISO 6507-1:2018-01. Metallic materials - Vickers hardness test - Part 1: Test method. Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH. https://doi.org/10.31030/2778746
ISO 25178-2:2012. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - Surface texture: Areal - Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH. https://doi.org/10.31030/1754208
Huhtamäki T, Tian X, Korhonen JT, Ras RHA. Surface-wetting characterization using contact-angle measurements. Nat Protoc. 2018;13:1521–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0003-z
doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0003-z
Owens DK, Wendt RC. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci. 1969;13:1741–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1969.070130815
doi: 10.1002/app.1969.070130815
Drummond JL. Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials. J Dent Res. 2008;87:710–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700802
doi: 10.1177/154405910808700802
Wu W, Toth EE, Moffa JF, Ellison JA. Subsurface damage layer of in vivo worn dental composite restorations. J Dent Res. 1984;63:675–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630051401
doi: 10.1177/00220345840630051401
Schmohl L, Roesner AJ, Fuchs F, Wagner M, Schmidt MB, Hahnel S, et al. Acid Resistance of CAD/CAM Resin Composites. Biomedicines. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061383
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10061383
Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Ionescu AC, Paolone G, Gherlone E, Ferracane JL, et al. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures. J Dent. 2017;67:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.012
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.012
Drummond JL, Carlo F, de, Super BJ. Three-dimensional tomography of composite fracture surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005;74:669–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30298
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30298