Atrial fibrillation ablation outcome prediction with a machine learning fusion framework incorporating cardiac computed tomography.
atrial fibrillation
cardiac imaging
catheter ablation
machine learning
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
ISSN: 1540-8167
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010756
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2023
05 2023
Historique:
revised:
06
03
2023
received:
12
11
2022
accepted:
14
03
2023
medline:
22
5
2023
pubmed:
20
3
2023
entrez:
19
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Structural changes in the left atrium (LA) modestly predict outcomes in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Machine learning (ML) is a promising approach to personalize AF management strategies and improve predictive risk models after catheter ablation by integrating atrial geometry from cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans and patient-specific clinical data. We hypothesized that ML approaches based on a patient's specific data can identify responders to AF ablation. Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation, who had preprocedural CT scans, demographics, and 1-year follow-up data, were included in the study for a retrospective analysis. The inputs of models were CT-derived morphological features from left atrial segmentation (including the shape, volume of the LA, LA appendage, and pulmonary vein ostia) along with deep features learned directly from raw CT images, and clinical data. These were merged intelligently in a framework to learn their individual importance and produce the optimal classification. Three hundred twenty-one patients (64.2 ± 10.6 years, 69% male, 40% paroxysmal AF) were analyzed. Post 10-fold nested cross-validation, the model trained to intelligently merge and learn appropriate weights for clinical, morphological, and imaging data (AUC 0.821) outperformed those trained solely on clinical data (AUC 0.626), morphological (AUC 0.659), or imaging data (AUC 0.764). Our ML approach provides an end-to-end automated technique to predict AF ablation outcomes using deep learning from CT images, derived structural properties of LA, augmented by incorporation of clinical data in a merged ML framework. This can help develop personalized strategies for patient selection in invasive management of AF.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Structural changes in the left atrium (LA) modestly predict outcomes in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Machine learning (ML) is a promising approach to personalize AF management strategies and improve predictive risk models after catheter ablation by integrating atrial geometry from cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans and patient-specific clinical data. We hypothesized that ML approaches based on a patient's specific data can identify responders to AF ablation.
METHODS
Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation, who had preprocedural CT scans, demographics, and 1-year follow-up data, were included in the study for a retrospective analysis. The inputs of models were CT-derived morphological features from left atrial segmentation (including the shape, volume of the LA, LA appendage, and pulmonary vein ostia) along with deep features learned directly from raw CT images, and clinical data. These were merged intelligently in a framework to learn their individual importance and produce the optimal classification.
RESULTS
Three hundred twenty-one patients (64.2 ± 10.6 years, 69% male, 40% paroxysmal AF) were analyzed. Post 10-fold nested cross-validation, the model trained to intelligently merge and learn appropriate weights for clinical, morphological, and imaging data (AUC 0.821) outperformed those trained solely on clinical data (AUC 0.626), morphological (AUC 0.659), or imaging data (AUC 0.764).
CONCLUSION
Our ML approach provides an end-to-end automated technique to predict AF ablation outcomes using deep learning from CT images, derived structural properties of LA, augmented by incorporation of clinical data in a merged ML framework. This can help develop personalized strategies for patient selection in invasive management of AF.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1164-1174Subventions
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 1U01CA190214
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 1U01CA187947
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : U01CA242879
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01-HL152256
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : K23 HL145017
Pays : United States
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : PG/15/91/31812
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : PG/13/37/30280
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : SP/18/6/33805
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : WT 203148/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Marrouche NF, Brachmann J, Andresen D, et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(5):417-427. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1707855
Packer DL, Mark DB, Robb RA, et al. Effect of catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy on mortality, stroke, bleeding, and cardiac arrest among patients with atrial fibrillation: the CABANA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321(13):1261-1274. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.0693
Andrade JG, Champagne J, Dubuc M, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation assessed by continuous monitoring. Circulation. 2019;140(22):1779-1788. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042622
Clarnette JA, Brooks AG, Mahajan R, et al. Outcomes of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2018;20:f366-f376. doi:10.1093/europace/eux297
Jacobs V, May HT, Bair TL, et al. The impact of risk score (CHADS2 versus CHA2DS2-VASc) on long-term outcomes after atrial fibrillation ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(4):681-686. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.034
Kosich F, Schumacher K, Potpara T, Lip GY, Hindricks G, Kornej J. Clinical scores used for the prediction of negative events in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Clin Cardiol. 2019;42(2):320-329. doi:10.1002/clc.23139
Kornej J, Hindricks G, Arya A, Sommer P, Husser D, Bollmann A. The APPLE score-a novel score for the prediction of rhythm outcomes after repeat catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169933. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169933
Siudak Z, Grygier M, Wojakowski W, et al. Clinical and procedural characteristics of COVID-19 patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96(6):E568-E575. doi:10.1002/ccd.29134
Issaka RB, Feld LD, Kao J, et al. Real-world data on the impact of COVID-19 on endoscopic procedural delays. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021;12(6):e00365. doi:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000365
Bhalodia R, Goparaju A, Sodergren T, et al. Deep learning for end-to-end atrial fibrillation recurrence estimation. Comput Cardiol. 2018;45:1-4.
Budzianowski J, Hiczkiewicz J, Burchardt P, et al. Predictors of atrial fibrillation early recurrence following cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins using statistical assessment and machine learning algorithms. Heart Vessels. 2019;34(2):352-359. doi:10.1007/s00380-018-1244-z
Shade JK, Ali RL, Basile D, et al. Preprocedure application of machine learning and mechanistic simulations predicts likelihood of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13(7):e008213. doi:10.1161/circep.119.008213
Roney CH, Sim I, Yu J, et al. Predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence by combining population data and virtual cohorts of patient-specific left atrial models. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022;15(2):e010253. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010253
Firouznia M, Feeny AK, LaBarbera MA, et al. Machine learning-derived fractal features of shape and texture of the left atrium and pulmonary veins from cardiac computed tomography scans are associated with risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation postablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021;14(3):e009265. doi:10.1161/circep.120.009265
Razeghi O, Qiu G. Object recognition with human in the loop intelligent frameworks. arXiv [csCV]. 2019.
Razeghi O, Solís-Lemus JA, Lee AWC, et al. CemrgApp: an interactive medical imaging application with image processing, computer vision, and machine learning toolkits for cardiovascular research. SoftwareX. 2020;12:100570. doi:10.1016/j.softx.2020.100570
Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells W, Frangi A, eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2015. Springer International Publishing; 2015:234-241.
Piccinelli M, Veneziani A, Steinman DA, Remuzzi A, Antiga L. A framework for geometric analysis of vascular structures: application to cerebral aneurysms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28(8):1141-1155. doi:10.1109/TMI.2009.2021652
La Barbera MA, Atta-Fosu T, Feeny AK, et al. New radiomic markers of pulmonary vein morphology associated with post-ablation recurrence of atrial fibrillation. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2021;10:1800209. doi:10.1109/JTEHM.2021.3134160
Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, et al. Pulsed field ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7(5):614-627. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2021.02.014
Andrade JG, Wells GA, Deyell MW, et al. Cryoablation or drug therapy for initial treatment of atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(4):305-315. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2029980
Kirchhof P, Camm AJ, Goette A, et al. Early rhythm-control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(14):1305-1316. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2019422
Tang S, Razeghi O, Kapoor R, et al. Machine learning-enabled multimodal fusion of intra-atrial and body surface signals in prediction of atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022;15(8):e010850. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.122.010850
Sánchez de la Nava AM, Atienza F, Bermejo J, Fernández-Avilés F. Artificial intelligence for a personalized diagnosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2021;320(4):H1337-H1347. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00764.2020
Verma A, Jiang C, Betts TR, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(19):1812-1822. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1408288
Thiyagarajah A, Kadhim K, Lau DH, et al. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of posterior wall isolation during atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019;12(8):e007005. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007005
Kirzner JM, Raelson CA, Liu CF, et al. Effects of focal impulse and rotor modulation-guided ablation on atrial arrhythmia termination and inducibility: impact on outcomes after treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30:2773-2781. doi:10.1111/jce.14240