Validation of prediction models for radiation-induced late rectal bleeding: Evidence from a large pooled population of prostate cancer patients.
Late rectal bleeding
Model validation
Multivariable models
NTCP models
Prostate cancer
Journal
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
ISSN: 1879-0887
Titre abrégé: Radiother Oncol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8407192
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2023
06 2023
Historique:
received:
25
01
2021
revised:
03
02
2023
accepted:
10
03
2023
medline:
5
6
2023
pubmed:
20
3
2023
entrez:
19
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To validate published models for the risk estimate of grade ≥ 1 (G1+), grade ≥ 2 (G2+) and grade = 3 (G3) late rectal bleeding (LRB) after radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer in a large pooled population from three prospective trials. The external validation population included patients from Europe, and Oceanian centres enrolled between 2003 and 2014. Patients received 3DCRT or IMRT at doses between 66-80 Gy. IMRT was administered with conventional or hypofractionated schemes (2.35-2.65 Gy/fr). LRB was prospectively scored using patient-reported questionnaires (LENT/SOMA scale) with a 3-year follow-up. All Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) models published until 2021 based on the Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD) from the rectal Dose Volume Histogram (DVH) were considered for validation. Model performance in validation was evaluated through calibration and discrimination. Sixteen NTCP models were tested on data from 1633 patients. G1+ LRB was scored in 465 patients (28.5%), G2+ in 255 patients (15.6%) and G3 in 112 patients (6.8%). The best performances for G2+ and G3 LRB highlighted the importance of the medium-high doses to the rectum (volume parameters n = 0.24 and n = 0.18, respectively). Good performance was seen for models of severe LRB. Moreover, a multivariate model with two clinical factors found the best calibration slope. Five published NTCP models developed on non-contemporary cohorts were able to predict a relative increase in the toxicity response in a more recent validation population. Compared to QUANTEC findings, dosimetric results pointed toward mid-high doses of rectal DVH. The external validation cohort confirmed abdominal surgery and cardiovascular diseases as risk factors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36934896
pii: S0167-8140(23)00166-4
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109628
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
109628Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.