Ultrasonography of intrascrotal torsed appendages: size and interval between symptom onset and the ultrasonographic examination according to echogenicity.
Appendix epididymis
Appendix testis
Color Doppler ultrasonography
Scrotum
Torsion
Ultrasonography
Journal
Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea)
ISSN: 2288-5919
Titre abrégé: Ultrasonography
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101626019
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
04
10
2022
accepted:
05
12
2022
medline:
21
3
2023
pubmed:
21
3
2023
entrez:
20
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study investigated the size of torsed appendages and the interval between symptom onset and the ultrasonographic examination according to the echogenicity of the torsed appendages. This was a retrospective analysis of 54 cases in 46 patients with torsion of the testicular appendages between December 2008 and July 2021. Eight patients received follow-up ultrasonography 7-48 days after initial ultrasonography. The echogenicity of torsed appendages was classified into three groups: hypoechoic, hyperechoic, or isoechoic. The 54 torsed appendages were hypoechoic (n=40), hyperechoic (n=9), or isoechoic (n=5). The size of the torsed appendages ranged from 4 to 14 mm (8.0±3.1 mm) in hypoechoic torsed appendages and from 2.6 to 5.0 mm (3.7±0.9 mm) in hyperechoic torsed appendages. The interval between symptom onset and the ultrasonographic examination ranged from 0 to 17 days (4.2±4.4 days) in hypoechoic torsed appendages and from 8 to 48 days (29.8±16.0 days) in hyperechoic torsed appendages. The hyperechoic torsed appendages were smaller and had longer intervals between symptom onset and the ultrasonographic examination than the hypoechoic torsed appendages (P<0.05). Three hypoechoic torsed appendages and a single isoechoic torsed appendage on initial ultrasonography became hyperechoic on follow-up ultrasonography. The size of the torsed appendages and the interval between symptom onset and the ultrasonographic examination varied according to the echogenicity of the torsed appendages. The hyperechoic torsed appendages were smaller and had longer intervals until the examination than the hypoechoic torsed appendages.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36935598
pii: usg.22169
doi: 10.14366/usg.22169
pmc: PMC10071070
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
259-264Références
J Ultrasound Med. 1992 Mar;11(3):81-3
pubmed: 1608079
Eur Radiol. 2003 Jan;13(1):127-35
pubmed: 12541120
J Clin Pathol. 2006 Aug;59(8):831-4
pubmed: 16569689
J Ultrasound Med. 1997 Mar;16(3):189-92; quiz 193-4
pubmed: 9166815
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Apr;184(4):1287-92
pubmed: 15788612
J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Jan;24(1):87-91
pubmed: 15615932
J Clin Ultrasound. 2015 Oct;43(8):485-9
pubmed: 25704247
Pediatr Radiol. 1993;23(7):529-32
pubmed: 8309755
J Ultrasound Med. 2011 Oct;30(10):1391-6
pubmed: 21968490