Modelling blood flow in patients with heart valve disease using deep learning: A computationally efficient method to expand diagnostic capabilities in clinical routine.

aortic stenosis artificial neural network computational fluid dynamics deep learning heart valve disease image-based modelling in-silico modelling

Journal

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
ISSN: 2297-055X
Titre abrégé: Front Cardiovasc Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101653388

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 03 01 2023
accepted: 13 02 2023
entrez: 20 3 2023
pubmed: 21 3 2023
medline: 21 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The computational modelling of blood flow is known to provide vital hemodynamic parameters for diagnosis and treatment-support for patients with valvular heart disease. However, most diagnosis/treatment-support solutions based on flow modelling proposed utilize time- and resource-intensive computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and are therefore difficult to implement into clinical practice. In contrast, deep learning (DL) algorithms provide results quickly with little need for computational power. Thus, modelling blood flow with DL instead of CFD may substantially enhances the usability of flow modelling-based diagnosis/treatment support in clinical routine. In this study, we propose a DL-based approach to compute pressure and wall-shear-stress (WSS) in the aorta and aortic valve of patients with aortic stenosis (AS). A total of 103 individual surface models of the aorta and aortic valve were constructed from computed tomography data of AS patients. Based on these surface models, a total of 267 patient-specific, steady-state CFD simulations of aortic flow under various flow rates were performed. Using this simulation data, an artificial neural network (ANN) was trained to compute spatially resolved pressure and WSS using a centerline-based representation. An unseen test subset of 23 cases was used to compare both methods. ANN and CFD-based computations agreed well with a median relative difference between both methods of 6.0% for pressure and 4.9% for wall-shear-stress. Demonstrating the ability of DL to compute clinically relevant hemodynamic parameters for AS patients, this work presents a possible solution to facilitate the introduction of modelling-based treatment support into clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36937926
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1136935
pmc: PMC10020717
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1136935

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Yevtushenko, Goubergrits, Franke, Kuehne and Schafstedde.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 16;7:12474
pubmed: 27527408
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018 Dec;31(12):1272-1284.e9
pubmed: 30146187
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;155(6):2277-2286.e2
pubmed: 29248286
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Feb 6;71(5):475-485
pubmed: 29406851
Med Phys. 2017 Jun;44(6):2281-2292
pubmed: 28276071
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Mar 26;73(11):1317-1335
pubmed: 30898208
Br Heart J. 1985 Dec;54(6):562-7
pubmed: 4074587
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Jan;42(1):64-75
pubmed: 36400676
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2005 Apr;8(2):127-37
pubmed: 16154876
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2022 Aug;15(4):834-844
pubmed: 34859367
Adv Healthc Mater. 2021 Oct;10(20):e2100968
pubmed: 34369107
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Mar 05;7:25
pubmed: 32195270
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016 Jan;11(1):133-44
pubmed: 25976833
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jan 1;57(1):133-141
pubmed: 31131388
Ann Nucl Med. 2022 Feb;36(2):111-122
pubmed: 35029816
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Dec;13(12):6943-6962
pubmed: 35070379
Biophys J. 2019 Dec 17;117(12):2324-2336
pubmed: 31427066
Biomed Eng Online. 2016 Aug 25;15(1):101
pubmed: 27562639
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Feb 09;7:593709
pubmed: 33634167
Front Physiol. 2018 Aug 14;9:993
pubmed: 30154723
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Dec 8;54(24):2251-60
pubmed: 19958961
Med Image Anal. 2022 Apr;77:102333
pubmed: 34998111
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 08;8:706628
pubmed: 34568450
Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):115-118
pubmed: 28117445
Technol Health Care. 2022;30(1):187-200
pubmed: 34806632
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jan 24;61(2):367-375
pubmed: 34718497
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 4;61(22):2233-41
pubmed: 23562923
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2019 Apr;18(2):435-451
pubmed: 30460623
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Feb;63:336-381
pubmed: 31344467
Heart. 2009 Jun;95(11):877-84
pubmed: 18812409
Radiologe. 2007 Nov;47(11):1021-8
pubmed: 17982738
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e195600
pubmed: 31173130
J Biomech. 2020 Jan 23;99:109544
pubmed: 31806261
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Aug;12(8 Pt 1):1549-1565
pubmed: 31395244
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jan;153(1):8-20.e3
pubmed: 27847162
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jun 21;40(24):1975-1986
pubmed: 30060039
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Nov;126:104038
pubmed: 33039809
Am J Cardiol. 1986 Feb 1;57(4):327-32
pubmed: 3946224
Eur Heart J. 2010 Jun;31(11):1390-7
pubmed: 20308041
Sci Transl Med. 2016 May 4;8(337):337ra64
pubmed: 27147588
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2020 Oct;36(10):e3387
pubmed: 32686898
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Apr;41(4):909-16
pubmed: 24723299
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Apr;12(4):681-689
pubmed: 29909114
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022 May-Jun;16(3):254-261
pubmed: 34887238
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Oct 18;9:750656
pubmed: 34733832
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jun 01;8:670841
pubmed: 34141729
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Sep 13;6(9):
pubmed: 28903936
EuroIntervention. 2022 Feb 04;17(14):e1126-e1196
pubmed: 34931612
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1213:3-21
pubmed: 32030660
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Nov;13(11):1795-1805
pubmed: 30008058
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2020 Oct;28(8):520-532
pubmed: 32878458
Eur Heart J. 2017 Feb 14;38(7):500-507
pubmed: 27252451
Artif Organs. 2018 Jan;42(1):49-57
pubmed: 28853220
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Dec;6(12):905-914
pubmed: 30274956
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018 Mar;22(2):537-544
pubmed: 28113333
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2022 Apr;26(4):1815-1825
pubmed: 34591773
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 May;33(6):1655-61
pubmed: 10334438

Auteurs

Pavlo Yevtushenko (P)

Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Institute of Computer-assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Institute for Imaging Science and Computational Modelling in Cardiovascular Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Leonid Goubergrits (L)

Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Institute of Computer-assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Institute for Imaging Science and Computational Modelling in Cardiovascular Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Einstein Center Digital Future, Berlin, Germany.

Benedikt Franke (B)

Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Institute of Computer-assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Institute for Imaging Science and Computational Modelling in Cardiovascular Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Titus Kuehne (T)

Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Institute of Computer-assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Institute for Imaging Science and Computational Modelling in Cardiovascular Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Marie Schafstedde (M)

Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Institute of Computer-assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Institute for Imaging Science and Computational Modelling in Cardiovascular Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.

Classifications MeSH