Patients Follow-up for Spinal Epidural Abscess as a Critical Treatment Plan Consideration.
infectious disease control
patient follow-up
post-operative care
surgery spine
treatment of spinal epidural abscess
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
accepted:
16
02
2023
entrez:
20
3
2023
pubmed:
21
3
2023
medline:
21
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare process with significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Treatment includes an extended course of antibiotics with or without surgery depending on the clinical presentation. Both non-operative and surgically treated patients require close follow-up to ensure the resolution of the infection without recurrence and/or progression of neurologic deficits. No previous study has looked specifically at follow-up in the SEA population, but the review of the literature does show evidence of varying degrees of difficulty with follow-up for this patient population. This retrospective review looked at follow-up for 147 patients with SEA at a single institution from 2012 to 2021. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences between groups of surgical versus non-surgical patients and those with adequate versus inadequate follow-up. Sixty-two of 147 (42.2%) patients had inadequate follow-up (less than 90 days) with their surgical team, and 112 of 147 (76.2%) patients had inadequate follow-up (less than 90 days) with infectious disease (ID). The primary statistically significant difference between patients with adequate versus inadequate follow-up was found to be surgical status with those treated surgically more likely to have adequate follow-up than those treated non-operatively. Improved follow-up in surgical patients should be considered as a factor when deciding on surgical versus non-operative treatment in the SEA patient population. Extra efforts coordinating follow-up care should be made for SEA patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36938240
doi: 10.7759/cureus.35058
pmc: PMC10023045
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e35058Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, MacNeille et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Nov 05;36(4):660-669
pubmed: 34740181
Surg Neurol. 2005 Apr;63(4):364-71; discussion 371
pubmed: 15808726
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 Apr;32(3):E126-E132
pubmed: 30451783
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jun 20;100(12):1030-1038
pubmed: 29916930
Spine J. 2015 Feb 1;15(2):249-55
pubmed: 25241303
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020 Nov;63(6):757-766
pubmed: 32759625
Spine J. 2019 May;19(5):888-895
pubmed: 30537555
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Apr 4;100(7):546-555
pubmed: 29613923
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jul;163:e673-e677
pubmed: 35472643
Global Spine J. 2021 Dec 05;:21925682211039185
pubmed: 34866455
N Engl J Med. 1948 Dec 2;239(23):845-54
pubmed: 18894306
World Neurosurg. 2019 Mar;123:e416-e426
pubmed: 30500590
Neurosurgery. 1990 Aug;27(2):177-84
pubmed: 2385333
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Mar;20(3):344-9
pubmed: 24359002
Neurosurgery. 2009 Nov;65(5):919-23; discussion 923-4
pubmed: 19834405
Neurosurgery. 1996 Nov;39(5):958-64
pubmed: 8905751
Spine J. 2015 Jan 1;15(1):10-7
pubmed: 24937797
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):61-70
pubmed: 35177522
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Aug;45(4):2877-2885
pubmed: 35536406
Neurosurg Focus. 2014 Aug;37(2):E1
pubmed: 25081958
Spine J. 2022 Nov;22(11):1830-1836
pubmed: 35738500
Neurosurgery. 2022 Sep 1;91(3):422-426
pubmed: 35584275
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Nov 1;28(21):e929-e938
pubmed: 32694325
Neurosurgery. 2002 Jul;51(1):79-85; discussion 86-7
pubmed: 12182438
Neurosurg Focus. 2014 Aug;37(2):E4
pubmed: 25081964
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005 Feb;147(2):159-66; discussion 166
pubmed: 15570436
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jul;19(1):119-27
pubmed: 23662888
Medicine (Baltimore). 1992 Nov;71(6):369-85
pubmed: 1359381