Identifying positive and negative use of non-technical skills by anesthesiologists in the clinical operating room: An exploratory descriptive study.
Anesthesiology
Operating rooms
Patient safety
Psychological
Resilience
Journal
Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
31
10
2022
revised:
03
02
2023
accepted:
21
02
2023
entrez:
20
3
2023
pubmed:
21
3
2023
medline:
21
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Teamwork is a critical competency in high-risk settings like the operating room (OR). While conventional approaches focus on describing and learning from negative performance, there may be value in learning from high-performing behaviour, particularly in specialties where serious safety events are relatively rare. This study aimed to explore both the positive and negative use of non-technical skills by anesthesia practitioners in the OR and situate them within the clinical OR context. This study employed a prospective observational design. Following research ethics approval, a sample of surgical cases in a tertiary hospital were recorded using the OR Black Box®. Data related to surgical phase timing, non-technical skills, team factors, and environmental factors were identified by analysts according to a modified Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model. We performed descriptive statistics and qualitative description of these observations. We observed 25 surgical cases capturing 242 instances of positive non-technical skills among anesthesiologists in the operating room and 9 instances of negative demonstrations. Situational awareness was most frequently (n = 160) observed, followed by communication and teamwork skills (n = 82), and were most often demonstrated in the context of potential environmental distractions (e.g., doors opening, unnecessary interruptions). The least common category of positive non-technical skills observed was leadership (n = 3). Our findings show anesthesiologists are doing a lot "right" and there may be many opportunities for learning from positive practice in the clinical setting. These findings can inform future work to better understand and standardize best practices for non-technical performance in anesthesia.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Teamwork is a critical competency in high-risk settings like the operating room (OR). While conventional approaches focus on describing and learning from negative performance, there may be value in learning from high-performing behaviour, particularly in specialties where serious safety events are relatively rare. This study aimed to explore both the positive and negative use of non-technical skills by anesthesia practitioners in the OR and situate them within the clinical OR context.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
This study employed a prospective observational design. Following research ethics approval, a sample of surgical cases in a tertiary hospital were recorded using the OR Black Box®. Data related to surgical phase timing, non-technical skills, team factors, and environmental factors were identified by analysts according to a modified Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model. We performed descriptive statistics and qualitative description of these observations.
Results
UNASSIGNED
We observed 25 surgical cases capturing 242 instances of positive non-technical skills among anesthesiologists in the operating room and 9 instances of negative demonstrations. Situational awareness was most frequently (n = 160) observed, followed by communication and teamwork skills (n = 82), and were most often demonstrated in the context of potential environmental distractions (e.g., doors opening, unnecessary interruptions). The least common category of positive non-technical skills observed was leadership (n = 3).
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Our findings show anesthesiologists are doing a lot "right" and there may be many opportunities for learning from positive practice in the clinical setting. These findings can inform future work to better understand and standardize best practices for non-technical performance in anesthesia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36938432
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14094
pii: S2405-8440(23)01301-4
pmc: PMC10018462
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e14094Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Ergonomics. 2006 Apr 15-May 15;49(5-6):589-604
pubmed: 16717011
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Dec;121(6):1218-1226
pubmed: 30442248
Implement Sci. 2009 May 08;4:25
pubmed: 19426507
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Nov;23(11):880-3
pubmed: 25049424
Br J Anaesth. 2003 May;90(5):580-8
pubmed: 12697584
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 16;23(3):e15443
pubmed: 33724199
JAMA Surg. 2017 Oct 1;152(10):972-973
pubmed: 28813552
Ergonomics. 2013;56(11):1669-86
pubmed: 24088063
Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Jan;66(1):64-69
pubmed: 35309030
Ann Surg. 2020 Dec;272(6):1164-1170
pubmed: 30946083
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Feb;214(2):214-30
pubmed: 22200377
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Dec;28(6):735-9
pubmed: 26356293