Comparing Myringoplasty to Type I Tympanoplasty in Tympanic Membrane Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.


Journal

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1097-6817
Titre abrégé: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8508176

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2023
Historique:
revised: 10 10 2022
received: 31 07 2022
accepted: 18 10 2022
medline: 24 4 2023
pubmed: 21 3 2023
entrez: 20 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare the anatomic success rates of type I tympanoplasty (tympanoplasty) versus myringoplasty. By our definition, tympanoplasty involves entering the middle ear via elevation of a tympanomeatal flap, while myringoplasty involves surgery to the drumhead without middle ear exposure. PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane. To be included, studies must have documented surgical technique, tympanic membrane (TM) perforation size (as % of TM), and success rate using tissue or alloplastic grafts. Exclusion criteria included series with more than 10% of patients with cholesteatoma or middle ear pathology. A meta-analysis of weighted summary proportions under the random effects model was performed, and proportion differences (PD) were calculated. A secondary analysis of hearing outcomes was performed. Eighty-five studies met inclusion, with a tympanoplasty cohort of n = 7966 and n = 1759 for myringoplasty. For perforations, less than 50% of the TM, the success rate for tympanoplasty and myringoplasty was 90.2% and 91.4%, respectively (PD: 1.2%, p = .19). In perforations greater than 50%, tympanoplasty and myringoplasty success rates were 82.8% and 85.3%, respectively (PD: 2.5%, p = .29). For both procedures, perforations less than 50% of the TM had higher success rates than perforations greater than 50% of the TM (p < .01). Both techniques endorsed significant improvements to air-bone gap (ABG) metrics. Our analysis suggests that the anatomic success rate is similar for tympanoplasty and myringoplasty, regardless of perforation size, and that smaller perforations experience higher success rates in both techniques. ABG outcomes were also similar between procedure techniques.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36939595
doi: 10.1002/ohn.191
doi:

Types de publication

Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

922-934

Informations de copyright

© 2023 American Association of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.

Références

Afolabi OA, Aremu SK, Alabi BS, Segun-Busari S. Traumatic tympanic membrane perforation: an aetiological profile. BMC Res Notes. 2009;2:232.
Bluestone CD. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of chronic suppurative otitis media: implications for prevention and treatment. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;42(3):207-223.
Schilder AGM, Marom T, Bhutta MF, et al. Panel 7: otitis media: treatment and complications. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery. 2017;156(4_suppl):S88-S105.
Matsuda Y, Kurita T, Ueda Y, Ito S, Nakashima T. Effect of tympanic membrane perforation on middle-ear sound transmission. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123:81-89.
Mehta RP, Rosowski JJ, Voss SE, O'Neil E, Merchant SN. Determinants of hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane. Otol Neurotol. 2006;27(2):136-143.
Rizer FM. Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part I: historical review of the literature. Laryngoscope. 1997;107(S84):1-25.
Lee P, Kelly G, Mills RP. Myringoplasty: does the size of the perforation matter? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002;27(5):331-334.
Onal K, Uguz MZ, Kazikdas KC, Gursoy ST, Gokce H. A multivariate analysis of otological, surgical and patient-related factors in determining success in myringoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005;30(2):115-120.
Wasson JD, Papadimitriou CE, Pau H. Myringoplasty: impact of perforation size on closure and audiological improvement. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123(9):973-977.
Abdelhameed W, Rezk I, Awad A. Impact of cartilage graft size on success of tympanoplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;83(5):507-511.
Al-Ghamdi SA. Tympanoplasty: factors influencing surgical outcome. Ann Saudi Med. 1994;14(6):483-485.
Iacovou E, Vlastarakos PV, Papacharalampous G, Kyrodimos E, Nikolopoulos TP. Is cartilage better than temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty? Implications for current surgical practice. Eur Arch Otrhinolaryngol. 2013;270(11):2803-2813.
Mohamad SH, Khan I, Hussain SSM. Is cartilage tympanoplasty more effective than fascia tympanoplasty? A systematic review. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33(5):699-705.
Chen Y, Jiang X, Yang L, Wang J, Li P. Endoscopic transcanal push-trough myringoplasty for different types of tympanic membrane perforations. Otol Neurotol. 2021;42(5):726-732.
Atchariyasathian V, Suwannajak R, Plodpai Y, Pitathawatchai P. A comparison of endoscopic transtympanic myringoplasty and endoscopic type I tympanoplasty for repairing medium- to large-sized tympanic membrane perforation: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Otrhinolaryngol. 2020;277(8):2199-2207.
Tseng C-C, Lai M-T, Wu C-C, Yuan S-P, Ding Y-F. Comparison of endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty and endoscopic type I tympanoplasty in repairing medium-sized tympanic perforations. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017;44(6):672-677.
Abdelghany AM. The button graft technique for perforations affecting less than 25% of the tympanic membrane: a non-randomised comparison of a new modification to cartilage tympanoplasty with underlay and overlay grafts. Clin Otolaryngol. 2013;38(3):208-216.
Alzoubi FQ, Tarifi AA, Khader Y, de Carpentier J. Comparison between transtympanic and elevation of tympanomeatal flap approaches in tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31(5):773-775.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
Group OLoEW. The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2. 2011. Accessed January 5, 2023. https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629-634.
Sterne JAC, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(10):1046-1055.
Abood A, Torzynski B, Ovesen T. Pediatric type 1 tympanoplasty-does age matter? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;137:110219.
Acar M, Yazıcı D, San T, Muluk NB, Cingi C. Fat-plug myringoplasty of ear lobule vs abdominal donor sites. Eur Arch Otrhinolaryngol. 2015;272(4):861-866.
Adkins WY, White B. Type I tympanoplasty: influencing factors. Laryngoscope. 1984;94(7):916-918.
Al-Khtoum N, Hiari MA, Al-Khtoum N, Ali Hiari M. Myringoplasty in children: retrospective analysis of 35 cases. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;75(3):371-374.
Babu S, Luryi AL, Schutt CA. Over-under versus medial tympanoplasty: comparison of benefit, success, and hearing results. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(5):1206-1210.
Choi N, Noh Y, Park W, et al. Comparison of endoscopic tympanoplasty to microscopic tympanoplasty. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;10(1):44-49.
Dangol K, Shrivastav R. Study of various prognostic factors affecting successful myringoplasty in a tertiary care centre. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;21(03):250-254.
Das A, Sen B, Ghosh D, Sengupta A. Myringoplasty: impact of size and site of perforation on the success rate. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;67(2):185-189.
Deenadayal DS, Neeli AK, Patel SH. Graft uptake rates with isoamyl-2-cyanoacrylate in myringoplasty procedures: a 10-year retrospective study. Otolaryngolo Head Neck Surg. 2011;145(3):442-445.
Deosthale NV, Khadakkar SP, Kumar PD, et al. Effectiveness of type I tympanoplasty in wet and dry ear in safe chronic suppurative otitis media. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;70(3):325-330.
D'Eredità R. Porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) myringoplasty in children: a randomized controlled study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79(7):1085-1089.
Diaz AR, Reina CO, Plaza G, Posadas ER, Arevalo FV, Iriarte MTG. Long-term follow-up after fat graft myringoplasty: do size and location matter? Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;100(3_suppl):229S-234S.
Dursun E, Demir E, Terzi S, Coşkun ZÖ, Çeliker M, Erdivanlı ÖÇ. Bilateral same-day endoscopic tympanoplasty. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020;41(2):102397.
Dursun E, Terzi S, Demir E, et al. The evaluation of prognostic factors in endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otrhinolaryngol. 2020;277(10):2687-2691.
Eisenbeis JF, Herrmann BW. Areolar connective tissue grafts in pediatric tympanoplasty: a pilot study. Am J Otolaryngol. 2004;25(2):79-83.
El-Anwar M, AbdElbary MS, Saber I, Elshora MS, Hosny S. Topical silver nitrate application during myringoplasty for large tympanic membrane perforation. Indian J Otol. 2019;25(4):177-179.
El-Anwar MW, El-Ahl MAS, Zidan AA, Yacoup MARAS. Topical use of autologous platelet rich plasma in myringoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2015;42(5):365-368.
El-Kholy NA, Salem MA, Rakha AM. Endoscopic single versus double flap tympanoplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Otrhinolaryngol. 2021;278(5):1395-1401.
Emir H, Ceylan K, Kizilkaya Z, Gocmen H, Uzunkulaoglu H, Samim E. Success is a matter of experience: type 1 tympanoplasty: influencing factors on type 1 tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otrhinolaryngol. 2007;264(6):595-599.
Ersözlü T, Gultekin E. A comparison of the autologous platelet-rich plasma gel fat graft myringoplasty and the fat graft myringoplasty for the closure of different sizes of tympanic membrane perforations. Ear Nose Throat J. 2020;99(5):331-336.
Fouad YA, Abdelhady M, El-Anwar M, Merwad E. Topical platelet rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid during fat graft myringoplasty. Am J Otolaryngol. 2018;39(6):741-745.
Gaslin M, O'Reilly RC, Morlet T, McCormick M. Pediatric cartilage interleave tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery. 2007;137(2):284-288.
Gun T, Sozen T, Boztepe OF, Gur OE, Muluk NB, Cingi C. Influence of size and site of perforation on fat graft myringoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014;41(6):507-512.
Hakuba N, Iwanaga M, Tanaka S, et al. Basic fibroblast growth factor combined with atelocollagen for closing chronic tympanic membrane perforations in 87 patients. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31(1):118-121.
Hakuba N, Taniguchi M, Shimizu Y, Sugimoto A, Shinomori Y, Gyo K. A new method for closing tympanic membrane perforations using basic fibroblast growth factor. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(8):1352-1355.
Halim A, Borgstein J. Pediatric myringoplasty: postaural versus transmeatal approach. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;73(11):1580-1583.
Han JS, Han JJ, Park JM, Seo JH, Park KH. The long-term stability of fat-graft myringoplasty in the closure of tympanic membrane perforations and hearing restoration. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2021;83(2):85-92.
Harvinder S, Hassan S, Sidek DS, Hamzah M, Samsudin AR, Philip R. Underlay myringoplasty: comparison of human amniotic membrane to temporalis fascia graft. Med J Malaysia. 2005;60(5):585-589.
Horváth T, Horváth B, Liktor B, Zrubka Z, Liktor B. Risk stratification in endoscopic type I. Tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otrhinolaryngol. 2021;278(12):4757-4766.
Karataş M, Doğan S. Endoscopic inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty in pediatric patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;121:10-14.
Karhuketo TS, Ilomäki JH, Puhakka HJ. Tympanoscope-assisted myringoplasty. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2001;63(6):353-358, discussion 358.
Kaya I, Benzer M, Uslu M, Bilgen C, Kirazli T. Butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty long-term results: excellent treatment method in small and medium sized perforations. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;11(1):23-29.
Kessler A, Potsic WP, Marsh RR. Type 1 tympanoplasty in children. Archiv Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(5):487-490.
Kim DJ, Lee HM, Choi SW, Oh SJ, Kong SK, Lee IW. Comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty performed by a single experienced surgeon. Am J Otolaryngol. 2021;42(1):102788.
Kim D-K, Park S-N, Yeo SW, et al. Clinical efficacy of fat-graft myringoplasty for perforations of different sizes and locations. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011;131(1):22-26.
Ko C-A, Yang C-H, Wu C-N, Huang P, Hwang C-F. Comparison of the functional success of fat myringoplasty and perifascial areolar tympanoplasty in transcanal endoscopic ear surgery. Ear Nose Throat J. 2020;101:314-318.
Kumar A, Namdeorao MS, Gupta A. Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty-smart myringoplasty for nex gen ent surgeons: our experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;74:141-147.
Kwong KM, Smith MM, Coticchia JM. Fat graft myringoplasty using umbilical fat. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76(8):1098-1101.
Linares Casas A, Ruiz R, De Pauli D. Endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty; a composite graft technique for subtotal and total perforations. Eur Arch Otrhinolaryngol. 2022;279(1):181-186.
Lin M-Y, Chang T-S, Liao J-B. The pretragal superficial musculoaponeurotic system fascia: a new graft material for transcanal tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41(5):644-653.
Lin YC, Wang WH, Weng HH, Lin YC. Predictors of surgical and hearing long-term results for inlay cartilage tympanoplasty. Archiv Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137(3):215-219.
Mandour MF, Elsheikh MN, Khalil MF. Platelet-rich plasma fat graft versus cartilage perichondrium for repair of medium-size tympanic membrane perforations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;160(1):116-121.
Mathur NN, Manimaran V, Deka A. A short term comparison of cartilage with temporalis fascia graft tympanoplasty in paediatric and adolescent population. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71(suppl 2):1069-1074.
Mohanty S, Manimaran V, Umamaheswaran P, Jeyabalakrishnan S, Chelladurai S. Endoscopic cartilage versus temporalis fascia grafting for anterior quadrant tympanic perforations-a prospective study in a tertiary care hospital. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018;45(5):936-942.
Nakhla V, Takwoingi YM, Sinha A. Myringoplasty: a comparison of bismuth iodoform paraffin paste gauze pack and tri-adcortyl ointment ear dressing. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;121(4):329-332.
Ohki M, Kikuchi S, Tanaka S. Endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media: comparative study with a postauricular microscopic approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;161(2):315-323.
Ophir D, Porat M, Marshak G. Myringoplasty in the pediatric population. Archiv Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(12):1288-1290.
Ozbek C, Ciftçi O, Tuna EE, Yazkan O, Ozdem C. A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty in children: anatomic and functional results. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(5):679-683.
Ozgursoy OB, Yorulmaz I. Fat graft myringoplasty: a cost-effective but underused procedure. J Laryngol Otol. 2005;119(4):277-279.
Ozturk A, Benzer M, Kaya I, Gode S, Bilgen C, Kirazli T. Comparison of anterior and posterior tympanomeatal flap elevations in endoscopic transcanal tympanoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol. 2019;139(8):692-696.
Khan MM, Parab SR. Endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty: a two-handed technique using an endoscope holder. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(8):1893-1898.
Raj A, Sayal A, Rathore PK, Meher R. Sutureless tympanoplasty using acellular dermis. Am J Otolaryngol. 2011;32(2):96-99.
Redaelli de Zinis LO, Nassif N, Zanetti D. Long-term results and prognostic factors of underlay myringoplasty in pars tensa atelectasis in children. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(1):34-39.
Ribeiro JC, Rui C, Natercia S, Jose R, Antonio P. Tympanoplasty in children: a review of 91 cases. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011;38(1):21-25.
Riss JC, Roman S, Morredu E, Farinetti A, Nicollas R, Triglia JM. Butterfly-cartilage tympanoplasty in children: a 28-case series and literature review. Eur Annals Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016;133(3):179-182.
Rozendorn N, Wolf M, Yakirevich A, Shapira Y, Carmel E. Myringoplasty in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;90:245-250.
Sakagami M, Yuasa R, Yuasa Y. Simple underlay myringoplasty. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;121(9):840-844.
Saliba I, Woods O. Hyaluronic acid fat graft myringoplasty: a minimally invasive technique. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(2):375-380.
Salviz M, Bayram O, Bayram AA, et al. Prognostic factors in type I tympanoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2015;42(1):20-23.
Seidman MD. Anterior transcanal tympanoplasty: a novel technique to repair anterior perforations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;138(2):242-245.
Shankar R, Virk RS, Gupta K, Gupta AK, Bal A, Bansal S. Evaluation and comparison of type I tympanoplasty efficacy and histopathological changes to the tympanic membrane in dry and wet ear: a prospective study. J Laryngol Otol. 2015;129(10):945-949.
Sharma C, Singh J, Kakkar V, Yadav SPS, Malik P, Bishnoi S. Fat graft myringoplasty in small central perforations. Indian J Otol. 2014;20(4):211-215.
Sharma P, Parida PK, Preetam C, Mukherjee S, Nayak A, Pradhan P. Outcome of temporalis fascia myringoplasty with and without use of platelet rich plasma: a randomized control trial. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021:1-9.
Shishegar M, Faramarzi M, Rashidi Ravari M. Evaluation of middle ear risk index in patients undergoing tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otrhinolaryngol. 2019;276(10):2769-2774.
Shoman NM. Clinical and audiometric outcomes of palisade cartilage myringoplasty under local anesthetic in an office setting. Am J Otolaryngol. 2019;40(4):482-486.
Singh GB, Kumar D, Aggarwal K, Garg S, Arora R, Kumar S. Tympanoplasty: does dry or wet temporalis fascia graft matter? J Laryngol Otol. 2016;130(8):700-705.
Singh GB, Ranjan S, Arora R, Kumar S. Role of circumferential subannular tympanoplasty in anterior and subtotal perforations. J Laryngol Otol. 2017;131(2):123-127.
Singh GB, Sidhu TS, Sharma A, Singh N. Tympanoplasty type I in children-an evaluative study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69(8):1071-1076.
Srinivasan V, Toynton SC, Mangat KS. Transtympanic myringoplasty in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;39(3):199-204.
Tek A, Karaman M, Uslu C, et al. Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia. Eur Arch Otrhinolaryngol. 2012;269(4):1117-1126.
Torre Carlos d, Carolina V, Perla V. Middle ear risk index (MERI) as a prognostic factor for tympanoplasty success in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;144:110695.
Tseng CC, Lai MT, Wu CC, Yuan SP, Ding YF. Comparison of endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty and endoscopic type I tympanoplasty in repairing medium-sized tympanic perforations. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017;44(6):672-677.
Tuzuner A, Demirci S, Kuran G, Callioglu EE, Tulaci KG, Caylan R. Does glubran 2 improve the graft uptake in tympanoplasty? A retrospective study. Eur Arch Otrhinolaryngol. 2015;272(1):3-8.
van Stekelenburg BCA, Aarts MCJ. Determinants influencing success rates of myringoplasty in daily practice: a retrospective analysis. Eur Arch Otrhinolaryngol. 2019;276(11):3081-3087.
Vartiainen E, Nuutinen J. Success and pitfalls in myringoplasty: follow-up study of 404 cases. Am J Otol. 1993;14(3):301-305.
Vartiainen E, Vartiainen J. Tympanoplasty in young patients: the role of adenoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery. 1997;117(6):583-585.
Westerberg J, Harder H, Magnuson B, Westerberg L, Hydén D. Ten-year myringoplasty series: does the cause of perforation affect the success rate? J Laryngol Otol. 2011;125(2):126-132.
Xing C, Liu H, Li G, Li J, Li X. Type 1 tympanoplasty in patients with large perforations: comparison of temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(8):030006052094514.
Yilmaz MS, Kara A, Guven M, Demir D, Erkorkmaz U. Assessment of the factors that affect the anatomic and functional success of cartilage tympanoplasty in children. J Craniofacial Surg. 2017;28(2):e106-e110.
Yuasa Y, Yuasa R. Postoperative results of simple underlay myringoplasty in better hearing ears. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008;128(2):139-143.
Gun T, Sozen T, Boztepe OF, Gur OE, Muluk NB, Cingi C. Influence of size and site of perforation on fat graft myringoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014;41(6):507-512.
Gun T, Boztepe OF, Atan D, Ikinciogullari A, Dere H. Comparison of hyaluronic acid fat graft myringoplasty, fat graft myringoplasty and temporal fascia techniques for the closure of different sizes and sites of tympanic membrane perforations. J Int Adv Otol. 2016;12(2):137-141.
Margolis RH, Wilson RH, Popelka GR, Eikelboom RH, Swanepoel DW, Saly GL. Distribution characteristics of air-bone gaps: evidence of bias in manual audiometry. Ear Hearing. 2016;37(2):177-188.
Odat H, Alali M, Kanaan Y, Al-Qudah M. Success rate of type 1 tympanoplasty: a comparative study. J Laryngol Otol. 2021;135(4):315-319.
Abood A, Torzynski B, Ovesen T. Pediatric type 1 tympanoplasty-does age matter? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;137:110219.
Jolink C, Zwemstra MR, de Wolf MJF, Ebbens FA, van Spronsen E. Success rate of tympanic membrane closure in the elderly compared to younger adults. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(1):e34-e38.

Auteurs

Walter Nicholas Jungbauer (W)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Seth Jeong (S)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Shaun A Nguyen (SA)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Paul R Lambert (PR)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH