Cultural Adaptation, Content Validation, and Reliability of the SACS 2.0 Instrument for Colombian Spanish.
Journal
Advances in skin & wound care
ISSN: 1538-8654
Titre abrégé: Adv Skin Wound Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100911021
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Apr 2023
01 Apr 2023
Historique:
entrez:
20
3
2023
pubmed:
21
3
2023
medline:
23
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To realize the cultural adaptation and content validation and evaluate the reliability of the SACS 2.0 instrument in Colombian Spanish. The researchers conducted a methodological study with a quantitative approach. The adaptation process was carried out in five stages: translation, synthesis, reverse translation, evaluation by a committee of experts, and testing of the adapted version. In addition, the interobserver reliability was evaluated by four nurses who examined 210 stomas. All of the proposed stages were carried out successfully, and an adapted version of the instrument in Colombian Spanish was obtained. During the content validation stage, the instrument obtained a content validity index of 1. The adapted version of the test showed substantial agreement for the aspect of clarity, adequacy, and understandability. In the interobserver reliability, there was agreement in 95.7% of the evaluations for the classification of the lesions according to the quadrants (κ = 0.97-0.99). Authors achieved a culturally adapted, valid, and reliable instrument for the evaluation and classification of peristomal skin alterations in Colombian Spanish.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36940379
doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000920396.79155.93
pii: 00129334-202304000-00010
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
219-223Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Fletcher J, Beeckman D, Fumarola S, et al. International Best Practice Recommendations: prevention and management of moisture-associated skin damage (MASD). 2020. https://www.woundsinternational.com/resources/details/best-practice-recommendations-prevention-and-management-moisture-associated-skin-damage-masd . Last accessed January 17, 2023.
Silveira N, Lanza L. Adaptação cultural, índice de validade de conteúdo e confiabilidade interobservadores do the SACSTM Instrument: assessing and classifying peristomal skin lesion [Cross-cultural adaptation, content validity index, and interobserver reliability of the SACSTM Instrument: assessing and classifying peristomal skin lesion]. ESTIMA Braz J Enterostomal Ther 2019;17:1–8.
O’Flynn S. Peristomal skin damage: assessment, prevention and treatment. Br J Nurs 2019;14:S6–S12.
Nunes M, Santos V. Instrumentos de avaliação das complicações na pele periestoma: revisão integrativa [Tools for peristomal skin complications assessment: integrative review]. Aquichan 2018;18:477–91.
Boyles A, Hunt S. Care and management of a stoma: maintaining peristomal skin health. Br J Nurs 2016;25:S14–S21.
Colwell J, Beitz J. Survey of wound, ostomy and continence (WOC) nurse clinicians on stomal and peristomal complications. A content validation study. J WOCN 2007;34:57–69.
Woo K, Sibbald R, Ayello E, Coutts P, Garde D. Peristomal skin complications and management. Adv Skin Wound Care 2009;22:522–32.
Martins L, Ayello E, Claessens I, et al. The Ostomy Skin Tool: tracking peristomal skin changes. Br J Nurs 2010;19:960–4.
Bosio G, Pisani F, Fonti A, et al. Proposal for classifying peristomal skin disorders: results of a multicenter observational study. Ostomy Wound Manag 2007;53:38–43.
Kapsandoy S. Feasibility and Psychometric Evaluation of the Studio Alterazioni Cutanee Stomali (SACS™) Instrument for Assessment of Peristomal Skin Lesions in Children. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah; 2015.
Gasperini S, Antonini M, Militello G, Manfredda S, Arena R, Veraldi S. A revised version of the original SACS scale for peristomal skin disorders classification. WCET J 2016;36:22–9.
Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;57:3186–91.
Escobar J, Cuervo A. Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización [Content validity and expert judgment: an approach to its use]. Av en Medición 2008;6:27–36.
Tristán-López A. Modificación al modelo de Lawshe para el dictamen cuantitativo de la validez de contenido de un instrumento objetivo [Modification to Lawshe’s model for the quantitative opinion of the content validity of an objective instrument]. Av en Medición 2008;6:37–48.
Gjersing L, Caplehorn J, Clausen T. Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10:1–10.
Costa N, Orpinelli M. Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas [Content validity in the development and adaptation processes of measurement instruments]. Cien Saude Colet 2011;16:3061–8.
Sim J, Wright C. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005;85:257–68.
LeBlanc K, Whiteley I, McNichol L, Salvadalena G, Gray M. Peristomal medical adhesive-related skin injury: results of an international consensus meeting. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs 2019;46:125–36.