ctDNA guided adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard of care adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with high risk stage II or stage III colorectal cancer: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial (TRACC Part C).


Journal

BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 26 01 2023
accepted: 02 03 2023
entrez: 21 3 2023
pubmed: 22 3 2023
medline: 23 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) is emerging as a biomarker to predict recurrence in patients with curatively treated early stage colorectal cancer (CRC). ctDNA risk stratifies patients to guide adjuvant treatment decisions. We are conducting the UK's first multi-centre, prospective, randomised study to determine whether a de-escalation strategy using ctDNA to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) decisions is non-inferior to standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy, as measured by 3-year disease free survival (DFS) in patients with resected CRC with no evidence of MRD (ctDNA negative post-operatively). In doing so we may be able to spare patients unnecessary chemotherapy and associated toxicity and achieve significant cost savings for the National Health Service (NHS). We are recruiting patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III CRC who are being considered for ACT into the study which uses results from a plasma-only ctDNA assay to guide treatment decisions. Eligible patients are randomised 1:1 to receive ctDNA-guided chemotherapy versus SOC chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the difference in DFS at 3 years between the trial arms. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of patients in the ctDNA-guided arm who are ctDNA negative post-operatively and receive de-escalated ACT compared to the standard arm, the difference in overall survival (OS), neurotoxicity and quality of life between the arms, and the cost-effectiveness of ctDNA-guided therapy compared to SOC treatment. We hypothesise that using a ctDNA-guided approach to ACT decisions is non-inferior to SOC. Target accrual is 1621 patients over 4 years, which will provide a power of 80% with an alpha of 0.1 to demonstrate non-inferiority with a margin of 1.25 in survival of the ctDNA-guided approach compared to SOC. We anticipate approximately 50 UK centres will participate. The study opened with the Guardant Reveal plasma-only ctDNA assay in August 2022. The trial will determine whether ctDNA guided ACT is non-inferior to SOC ACT in patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III resected CRC, with the potential to significantly reduce unnecessary ACT and the toxicity associated with it. NCT04050345.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) is emerging as a biomarker to predict recurrence in patients with curatively treated early stage colorectal cancer (CRC). ctDNA risk stratifies patients to guide adjuvant treatment decisions. We are conducting the UK's first multi-centre, prospective, randomised study to determine whether a de-escalation strategy using ctDNA to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) decisions is non-inferior to standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy, as measured by 3-year disease free survival (DFS) in patients with resected CRC with no evidence of MRD (ctDNA negative post-operatively). In doing so we may be able to spare patients unnecessary chemotherapy and associated toxicity and achieve significant cost savings for the National Health Service (NHS).
METHODS METHODS
We are recruiting patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III CRC who are being considered for ACT into the study which uses results from a plasma-only ctDNA assay to guide treatment decisions. Eligible patients are randomised 1:1 to receive ctDNA-guided chemotherapy versus SOC chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the difference in DFS at 3 years between the trial arms. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of patients in the ctDNA-guided arm who are ctDNA negative post-operatively and receive de-escalated ACT compared to the standard arm, the difference in overall survival (OS), neurotoxicity and quality of life between the arms, and the cost-effectiveness of ctDNA-guided therapy compared to SOC treatment. We hypothesise that using a ctDNA-guided approach to ACT decisions is non-inferior to SOC. Target accrual is 1621 patients over 4 years, which will provide a power of 80% with an alpha of 0.1 to demonstrate non-inferiority with a margin of 1.25 in survival of the ctDNA-guided approach compared to SOC. We anticipate approximately 50 UK centres will participate. The study opened with the Guardant Reveal plasma-only ctDNA assay in August 2022.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
The trial will determine whether ctDNA guided ACT is non-inferior to SOC ACT in patients with fully resected high risk stage II and stage III resected CRC, with the potential to significantly reduce unnecessary ACT and the toxicity associated with it.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
NCT04050345.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36941575
doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10699-4
pii: 10.1186/s12885-023-10699-4
pmc: PMC10026439
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04050345']

Types de publication

Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

257

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jul 6;8(346):346ra92
pubmed: 27384348
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;5(12):1710-1717
pubmed: 31621801
Ann Oncol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1291-1305
pubmed: 32702383
Lancet. 2007 Dec 15;370(9604):2020-9
pubmed: 18083404
N Engl J Med. 1990 Feb 8;322(6):352-8
pubmed: 2300087
Acta Oncol. 2015 Jan;54(1):5-16
pubmed: 25430983
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Jun 15;5(4):
pubmed: 34350375
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 10;33(35):4176-87
pubmed: 26527776
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3416-22
pubmed: 26282635
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):562-578
pubmed: 29611518
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 16;386(24):2261-2272
pubmed: 35657320
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8664-70
pubmed: 16260700
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv22-iv40
pubmed: 28881920

Auteurs

Susanna Slater (S)

Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Annette Bryant (A)

Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Hsiang-Chi Chen (HC)

Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Ruwaida Begum (R)

Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Isma Rana (I)

Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Maria Aresu (M)

Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Clare Peckitt (C)

Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Oleg Zhitkov (O)

Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Retchel Lazaro-Alcausi (R)

Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Victoria Borja (V)

Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Rachel Powell (R)

Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

David Lowery (D)

Biomedical Research Centre at the Royal Marsden and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Michael Hubank (M)

Centre for Molecular Pathology at the The Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

Thereasa Rich (T)

Guardant Health, INC, Redwood City, CA, USA.

Gayathri Anandappa (G)

Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Ian Chau (I)

Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Naureen Starling (N)

Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

David Cunningham (D)

Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. david.cunningham@rmh.nhs.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH