Equity in the public social healthcare protection in Tanzania: does it matter on household healthcare financing?
Developing countries
Endogenous switching regression
Health economics
Health equity
Health financing
Instrumental variable poisson
Tanzania
Journal
International journal for equity in health
ISSN: 1475-9276
Titre abrégé: Int J Equity Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147692
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 03 2023
20 03 2023
Historique:
received:
10
03
2022
accepted:
01
03
2023
entrez:
21
3
2023
pubmed:
22
3
2023
medline:
23
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Efforts to promote equity in healthcare involve implementing policies and programs that address the root causes of healthcare disparities and promote equal access to care. One such program is the public social healthcare protection schemes. However, like many other developing countries, Tanzania has low health insurance coverage, hindering its efforts to achieve universal health coverage. This study examines the role of equity in public social healthcare protection and its effects on household healthcare financing in Tanzania. The study used secondary data collected from the National Bureau of Statistics' National Panel Survey 2020/21 and stratified households based on their place of residence (rural vs. urban). Moreover, the logit regression model, ordered logit, and the endogenous switching regression model were used to provide counterfactual estimates without selection bias and endogeneity problems. The results showed greater variations in social health protection across rural and urban households, increasing disparities in health outcomes between these areas. Rural residents are the most vulnerable groups. Furthermore, education, income, and direct healthcare costs significantly influence equity in healthcare financing and the ability of households to benefit from public social healthcare protection schemes. To achieve equity in healthcare in rural and urban areas, developing countries need to increase investment in health sector by reducing the cost of healthcare, which will significantly reduce household healthcare financing. Furthermore, the study recommends that social health protection is an essential strategy for improving fair access to quality healthcare by removing differences across households and promoting equality in utilizing healthcare services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36941603
doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01855-0
pii: 10.1186/s12939-023-01855-0
pmc: PMC10026448
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
50Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Jul;3(7):e396-409
pubmed: 26087986
Afr Health Sci. 2014 Jun;14(2):322-33
pubmed: 25320580
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 7;20(1):839
pubmed: 32894118
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Aug 26;2020:9065287
pubmed: 32908923
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 18;17(1):85
pubmed: 29914497
Value Health Reg Issues. 2020 May;21:133-140
pubmed: 31786404
Lancet. 2012 Jul 14;380(9837):126-33
pubmed: 22591542
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jan 29;17(1):14
pubmed: 29378658
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 2;11(9):e045807
pubmed: 34475146
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Nov 7;12(1):55
pubmed: 36342557
Glob Soc Welf. 2022 Aug 26;:1-12
pubmed: 36043157
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;244:112662
pubmed: 31726268
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Aug 01;:
pubmed: 35964163
J Prev Med Public Health. 2015 Nov;48(6):319-29
pubmed: 26639746
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 20;14:538
pubmed: 25411021
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Jul 8;12(1):36
pubmed: 35802268