Centering Frontline Health Care Workers in Digital Innovation Design to Inform the Optimization of an App for Improved Male Circumcision Follow-up in South Africa: Qualitative Usability Study.

South Africa digital health innovation health care workers perspectives low- and middle-income countries male circumcision mobile phone postoperative telehealth two-way texting usability

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 08 11 2022
accepted: 05 02 2023
revised: 24 01 2023
entrez: 22 3 2023
pubmed: 23 3 2023
medline: 23 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is a safe and effective HIV prevention strategy. However, adherence to recommended in-person, postoperative follow-up is inefficient for procedures with few adverse events. Two-way texting (2wT)-based follow-up appears to be a safe and an efficient alternative to scheduled clinic visits for low-risk patients who underwent VMMC. To ensure that 2wT responds to the needs of health care workers (HCWs) and patients, HCWs were closely involved in app design using a human-centered design (HCD) approach. Embedded within an ongoing randomized controlled trial of 2wT in South Africa and complementary HCD processes of 2wT app optimization, this qualitative study aimed to use key informant interviews (KIIs) to explore the thoughts, suggestions, and opinions on and perceptions of 2wT's usability and acceptability among HCWs involved in 2wT implementation in both urban and rural South Africa. A total of 7 HCWs using 2wT in Gauteng and the North West province participated in KIIs regarding the usability and acceptability of 2wT. HCWs were asked for their opinions on 2wT as a viable, useful, appropriate, and accessible method of postoperative VMMC care. They were also asked about 2wT-related working, exploring areas where 2wT could add to or reduce their daily tasks. The KII data were explored, coded, and analyzed by 3 qualitative researchers using thematic content analysis and the ATLAS.ti (ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH) software. Most HCWs felt confident, comfortable, satisfied, and well supported using a 2wT-based follow-up as an alternative to in-person clinical reviews. They felt that 2wT was easy to use and required little technical support after initial mentoring on how to use the 2wT system. Few noted safety concerns, as men can receive clinical guidance, reassurance, and referral via 2wT. Although fewer in-person visits reduced the in-person review workload and eased clinical flow, HCWs noted the added burden of having to interact with clients via SMS text messages on evenings or weekends. HCWs reinforced the need for enhanced postoperative counseling to ensure that 2wT patients could recognize and understood how to respond to early signs of complications. HCWs suggested a rotation to spread the evening and weekend workload and ensure swift patient responses. In this formative qualitative study focused on HCWs, 2wT was a highly usable alternative to in-person postoperative reviews for patients who underwent VMMC in South Africa. The HCD processes likely improved the usability and acceptability of 2wT for HCWs. HCWs supported the scale-up of 2wT given the distance from the clinic to the men's homes and the potential for reducing workload. To ensure success, providers urged sensitizing patients to the fact that 2wT augments, but does not replace, the existing after-hours and emergency care services.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is a safe and effective HIV prevention strategy. However, adherence to recommended in-person, postoperative follow-up is inefficient for procedures with few adverse events. Two-way texting (2wT)-based follow-up appears to be a safe and an efficient alternative to scheduled clinic visits for low-risk patients who underwent VMMC. To ensure that 2wT responds to the needs of health care workers (HCWs) and patients, HCWs were closely involved in app design using a human-centered design (HCD) approach.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Embedded within an ongoing randomized controlled trial of 2wT in South Africa and complementary HCD processes of 2wT app optimization, this qualitative study aimed to use key informant interviews (KIIs) to explore the thoughts, suggestions, and opinions on and perceptions of 2wT's usability and acceptability among HCWs involved in 2wT implementation in both urban and rural South Africa.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 7 HCWs using 2wT in Gauteng and the North West province participated in KIIs regarding the usability and acceptability of 2wT. HCWs were asked for their opinions on 2wT as a viable, useful, appropriate, and accessible method of postoperative VMMC care. They were also asked about 2wT-related working, exploring areas where 2wT could add to or reduce their daily tasks. The KII data were explored, coded, and analyzed by 3 qualitative researchers using thematic content analysis and the ATLAS.ti (ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH) software.
RESULTS RESULTS
Most HCWs felt confident, comfortable, satisfied, and well supported using a 2wT-based follow-up as an alternative to in-person clinical reviews. They felt that 2wT was easy to use and required little technical support after initial mentoring on how to use the 2wT system. Few noted safety concerns, as men can receive clinical guidance, reassurance, and referral via 2wT. Although fewer in-person visits reduced the in-person review workload and eased clinical flow, HCWs noted the added burden of having to interact with clients via SMS text messages on evenings or weekends. HCWs reinforced the need for enhanced postoperative counseling to ensure that 2wT patients could recognize and understood how to respond to early signs of complications. HCWs suggested a rotation to spread the evening and weekend workload and ensure swift patient responses.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In this formative qualitative study focused on HCWs, 2wT was a highly usable alternative to in-person postoperative reviews for patients who underwent VMMC in South Africa. The HCD processes likely improved the usability and acceptability of 2wT for HCWs. HCWs supported the scale-up of 2wT given the distance from the clinic to the men's homes and the potential for reducing workload. To ensure success, providers urged sensitizing patients to the fact that 2wT augments, but does not replace, the existing after-hours and emergency care services.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36947127
pii: v7i1e44122
doi: 10.2196/44122
pmc: PMC10131628
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e44122

Subventions

Organisme : NINR NIH HHS
ID : R01 NR019229
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©Sarah Day, Vuyolwethu Ncube, Lactricia Maja, Beatrice Wasunna, Jacqueline Pienaar, Geoffrey Setswe, Evelyn Waweru, Caryl Feldacker. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 22.03.2023.

Références

AIDS Behav. 2016 Nov;20(11):2629-2638
pubmed: 26781866
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 26;3:CD011942
pubmed: 32216074
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Aug;44(4):553-64
pubmed: 21292029
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Dec 03;13:1827-1837
pubmed: 33299320
PLOS Digit Health. 2022 Jun 15;1(6):e0000066
pubmed: 36812548
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Aug 27;3:110
pubmed: 32904379
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 13;7(5):e13963
pubmed: 31094351
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 30;15(9):e0239915
pubmed: 32997710
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Feb 26;4(1):40
pubmed: 33637833
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Jul 29;11(7):1473-1480
pubmed: 33963864
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 9;25:e42111
pubmed: 37159245
PLoS One. 2014 May 06;9(5):e80577
pubmed: 24801209
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 20;18(7):e0278806
pubmed: 37471383
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 9;9(3):e35693
pubmed: 36083628
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Nov 29;9(Suppl 2):S234-S243
pubmed: 34845047
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Apr;100:77-89
pubmed: 28241940
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020 Jan 1;83(1):16-23
pubmed: 31809358
Inf Technol Dev. 2019 Sep 29;26(3):477-505
pubmed: 32982007
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e19361
pubmed: 32452816
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 11;24(3):e24582
pubmed: 35275065
J Med Syst. 2015 Nov;39(11):176
pubmed: 26411928
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e160-e162
pubmed: 33328076
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(Suppl 1):
pubmed: 35675966
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 16;15(6):e0233234
pubmed: 32544161
Br Med Bull. 2019 Jun 19;130(1):25-37
pubmed: 31086957
Int J Equity Health. 2011 Nov 10;10:48
pubmed: 22074349
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jul;9(3):604-634
pubmed: 30112741
Ethn Dis. 2009 Spring;19(1 Suppl 1):S1-60-4
pubmed: 19484878

Auteurs

Sarah Day (S)

Division of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
The Centre for HIV-AIDS Prevention Studies, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Vuyolwethu Ncube (V)

The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Lactricia Maja (L)

The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Jacqueline Pienaar (J)

The Centre for HIV-AIDS Prevention Studies, Johannesburg, South Africa.
The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Geoffrey Setswe (G)

The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Evelyn Waweru (E)

Medic Mobile, Nairobi, Kenya.

Caryl Feldacker (C)

International Training and Education Center for Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Classifications MeSH