Medicare advantage and dialysis facility choice.
Medicare
chronic disease
health care financing/insurance/premiums
health policy/politics/law/regulation
managed care organizations (e.g., HMOs/PPOs/IPAs)
ownership/governance (for-profit/NFP/public/chains/systems)
Journal
Health services research
ISSN: 1475-6773
Titre abrégé: Health Serv Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0053006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
medline:
7
9
2023
pubmed:
24
3
2023
entrez:
23
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the characteristics of dialysis facilities used by traditional Medicare (TM) and Medicare advantage (MA) enrollees with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We used 20% TM claims and 100% MA encounter data from 2018 and publicly available data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. We compared the characteristics of the dialysis facilities treating TM and MA patients in the same ZIP code, adjusting for patient characteristics. The outcome variables were facility ownership, distance to the facility, and several measures of facility quality. We identified point prevalent dialysis patients as of July 15, 2018. Compared to TM patients in the same ZIP code, MA patients were 1.84 percentage points more likely to be treated at facilities owned by the largest two dialysis organizations and 1.85 percentage points less likely to be treated at an independently owned facility. MA patients went to further and lower quality facilities than TM patients in the same ZIP code. However, these differences in facility quality were modest. For example, while the mean dialysis facility mortality rate was 21.85, the difference in mortality rates at facilities treating MA and TM patients in the same ZIP code was 0.67 deaths per 100 patient-years. Similarly, MA patients went to facilities that were, on average, 0.15 miles further than TM patients in the same ZIP code. MA enrollees with ESKD were more likely than TM enrollees in the same ZIP code to use the dialysis facilities owned by the two largest chains, travel further for care, and receive care at lower quality facilities. While the magnitude of differences in facility distance and quality was modest, the direction of these results underscores the importance of monitoring dialysis network adequacy as ESKD MA enrollment continues to grow.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36949731
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14153
pmc: PMC10480079
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1035-1044Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : T32 AG066576
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Health Services Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Health Research and Educational Trust.
Références
Med Care. 2022 Mar 1;60(3):240-247
pubmed: 34974490
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Sep;27(9):395-400
pubmed: 34533909
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Apr;28(4):180-186
pubmed: 35420746
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 Mar 1;18(3):356-362
pubmed: 36763812
J Polit Econ. 2020 Mar;12(3):984-1026
pubmed: 32719571
Kidney Int Rep. 2019 Sep 18;4(11):1519-1522
pubmed: 31889730
Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct;58(5):1035-1044
pubmed: 36949731
Kidney360. 2022 May 24;3(8):1367-1373
pubmed: 36176657
Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug;57(4):957-962
pubmed: 35411550
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Aug;41(8):1107-1116
pubmed: 35914212
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193962
pubmed: 31099857
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jan;37(1):70-77
pubmed: 29309223
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910622
pubmed: 31483472
Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb;56(1):123-131
pubmed: 33184854
Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb;52(1):35-55
pubmed: 27060855
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jan;37(1):78-85
pubmed: 29309215
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919310
pubmed: 31940041
Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr;56(2):178-187
pubmed: 33165932