Isolation of Mammalian Peroxisomes by Density Gradient Centrifugation.


Journal

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
ISSN: 1940-6029
Titre abrégé: Methods Mol Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9214969

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
entrez: 23 3 2023
pubmed: 24 3 2023
medline: 28 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Sophisticated organelle fractionation strategies were the workhorse of early peroxisome research and led to the characterization of the principal functions of the organelle. However, even in the era of molecular biology and "omics" technologies, they are still of importance to unravel peroxisome-specific proteomes, confirm the localization of still uncharacterized proteins, analyze peroxisome metabolism or lipid composition, or study their protein import mechanism. To isolate and analyze peroxisomes for these purposes, density gradient centrifugation still represents a highly reliable and reproducible technique. This article describes two protocols to purify peroxisomes from either liver tissue or the HepG2 hepatoma cell line. The protocol for liver enables purification of peroxisome fractions with high purity (95%) and is therefore suitable to study low-abundant peroxisomal proteins or analyze their lipid composition, for example. The protocol presented for HepG2 cells is not suitable to gain highly pure peroxisomal fractions but is intended to be used for gradient profiling experiments and allows easier manipulation of the peroxisomal compartment, e.g., by gene knockdown or protein overexpression for functional studies. Both purification methods therefore represent complementary tools to be used to analyze different aspects of peroxisome physiology. Please note that this is an updated version of a protocol, which has been published in a former volume of Methods in Molecular Biology.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36952174
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3048-8_1
doi:

Substances chimiques

Lipids 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-12

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Islinger M, Manner A, Völkl A (2018) The craft of peroxisome purification – a technical survey through the decades. Subcell Biochem 89:85–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2233-4_4
doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-2233-4_4 pubmed: 30378020
Baudhuin P, Beaufay H, De Duve C (1965) Combined biochemical and morphological study of particulate fractions from rat liver. Analysis of preparations enriched in lysosomes or in particles containing urate oxidase, D-amino acid oxidase, and catalase. J Cell Biol 26:219–243. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.26.1.219
doi: 10.1083/jcb.26.1.219 pubmed: 4379260 pmcid: 2106697
De Duve C, Baudhuin P (1966) Peroxisomes (microbodies and related particles). Physiol Rev 46:323–357. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1966.46.2.323
doi: 10.1152/physrev.1966.46.2.323 pubmed: 5325972
Leighton F, Poole B, Beaufay H, Baudhuin P, Coffey JW, Fowler S, De Duve C (1968) The large-scale separation of peroxisomes, mitochondria, and lysosomes from the livers of rats injected with triton WR-1339. Improved isolation procedures, automated analysis, biochemical and morphological properties of fractions. J Cell Biol 37:482–513. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.37.2.482
doi: 10.1083/jcb.37.2.482 pubmed: 4297786 pmcid: 2107417
Rickwood D, Birnie GD (1975) Metrizamide, a new density-gradient medium. FEBS Lett 50:102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(75)80467-4
doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(75)80467-4 pubmed: 1112406
Volkl A, Fahimi HD (1985) Isolation and characterization of peroxisomes from the liver of normal untreated rats. Eur J Biochem 149:257–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb08920.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb08920.x pubmed: 3996409
Hajra AK, Wu D (1985) Preparative isolation of peroxisomes from liver and kidney using metrizamide density gradient centrifugation in a vertical rotor. Anal Biochem 148:233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(85)90651-7
doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(85)90651-7 pubmed: 4037302
Crane DI, Hemsley AC, Masters CJ (1985) Purification of peroxisomes from livers of normal and clofibrate-treated mice. Anal Biochem 148:436–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(85)90250-7
doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(85)90250-7 pubmed: 3933379
Rickwood D, Ford T, Graham J (1982) Nycodenz: a new nonionic iodinated gradient medium. Anal Biochem 123:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(82)90618-2
doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(82)90618-2 pubmed: 7114474
Ford T, Graham J, Rickwood D (1994) Iodixanol: a nonionic iso-osmotic centrifugation medium for the formation of self-generated gradients. Anal Biochem 220:360–366. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1994.1350
doi: 10.1006/abio.1994.1350 pubmed: 7978279
Islinger M, Luers GH, Li KW, Loos M, Volkl A (2007) Rat liver peroxisomes after fibrate treatment. A survey using quantitative mass spectrometry. J Biol Chem 282:23055–23069. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M610910200
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610910200 pubmed: 17522052
Wiese S et al (2007) Proteomics characterization of mouse kidney peroxisomes by tandem mass spectrometry and protein correlation profiling. Mol Cell Proteomics 6:2045–2057. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M700169-MCP200
doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700169-MCP200 pubmed: 17768142
Rokka A, Antonenkov VD, Soininen R, Immonen HL, Pirilä PL, Bergmann U, Sormunen RT, Weckström M, Benz R, Hiltunen JK (2009) Pxmp2 is a channel-forming protein in mammalian peroxisomal membrane. PLoS One 4:e5090. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005090
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005090 pubmed: 19352492 pmcid: 2662417
Antonenkov VD, Sormunen RT, Hiltunen JK (2004) The behavior of peroxisomes in vitro: mammalian peroxisomes are osmotically sensitive particles. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 287:C1623–C1635. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00142.2004
doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00142.2004 pubmed: 15306541
Islinger M, Luers GH, Zischka H, Ueffing M, Volkl A (2006) Insights into the membrane proteome of rat liver peroxisomes: microsomal glutathione-S-transferase is shared by both subcellular compartments. Proteomics 6:804–816. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200401347
doi: 10.1002/pmic.200401347 pubmed: 16385473
Schrader M, Baumgart E, Volkl A, Fahimi HD (1994) Heterogeneity of peroxisomes in human hepatoblastoma cell line HepG2. Evidence of distinct subpopulations. Eur J Cell Biol 64:281–294
pubmed: 7813516
Costello JL, Castro IG, Hacker C, Schrader TA, Metz J, Zeuschner D, Azadi AS, Godinho LF, Costina V, Findeisen P, Manner A, Islinger M, Schrader M (2017) ACBD5 and VAPB mediate membrane associations between peroxisomes and the ER. J Cell Biol 216:331–342. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201607055
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201607055 pubmed: 28108524 pmcid: 5294785
Kikuchi M, Hatano N, Yokota S, Shimozawa N, Imanaka T, Taniguchi H (2004) Proteomic analysis of rat liver peroxisome: presence of peroxisome-specific isozyme of Lon protease. J Biol Chem 279:421–428. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M305623200
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305623200 pubmed: 14561759
Camoes F et al (2014) New insights into the peroxisomal protein inventory: acyl-CoA oxidases and -dehydrogenases are an ancient feature of peroxisomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1853:111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.10.005
doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.10.005 pubmed: 25307522
Manner A, Islinger M (2017) Isolation of peroxisomes from rat liver and cultured hepatoma cells by density gradient centrifugation. Methods Mol Biol 1595:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6937-1_1
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6937-1_1 pubmed: 28409446
Islinger M, Abdolzade-Bavil A, Liebler S, Weber G, Volkl A (2012) Assessing heterogeneity of peroxisomes: isolation of two subpopulations from rat liver. Methods Mol Biol 909:83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-959-4_6
doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-959-4_6 pubmed: 22903710
He M, Pei Z, Mohsen AW, Watkins P, Murdoch G, Van Veldhoven PP, Ensenauer R, Vockley J (2011) Identification and characterization of new long chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenases. Mol Genet Metab 102:418–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2010.12.005
doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2010.12.005 pubmed: 21237683

Auteurs

Andreas Manner (A)

Institute of Neuroanatomy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Centre for Translational Neuroscience, Mannheim, Germany.

Markus Islinger (M)

Institute of Neuroanatomy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Centre for Translational Neuroscience, Mannheim, Germany. markus.islinger@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH